Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TSBK vs CZWI vs HONE vs NECB vs CFFN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
TSBK vs CZWI vs HONE vs NECB vs CFFN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $327M | $203M | $522M | $339M | $1.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $110M | $90M | $314M | $157M | $417M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $31M | $14M | $26M | $44M | $73M |
| Gross Margin | 70.1% | 54.7% | 50.9% | 66.1% | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | 32.8% | 7.0% | 10.9% | 39.6% | 19.9% |
| Forward P/E | 17.6x | 11.8x | 13.3x | 7.8x | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $23M | $52M | $517M | $75M | $1.95B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $251M | $119M | $231M | $81M | $252M |
TSBK vs CZWI vs HONE vs NECB vs CFFN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Timberland Bancorp,… (TSBK) | 100 | 228.2 | +128.2% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 291.2 | +191.2% |
| HarborOne Bancorp, … (HONE) | 100 | 151.8 | +51.8% |
| Northeast Community… (NECB) | 100 | 423.2 | +323.2% |
| Capitol Federal Fin… (CFFN) | 100 | 66.9 | -33.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TSBK vs CZWI vs HONE vs NECB vs CFFN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, TSBK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CZWI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.46, yield 1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs HONE's 1.05, lower leverage
HONE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.7%, EPS growth 78.4%
- 10.7% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
NECB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 460.8% 10Y total return vs TSBK's 250.8%
- PEG 0.23 vs CFFN's 5.82
- NIM 4.9% vs CFFN's 1.8%
- Lower P/E (7.8x vs 11.9x), PEG 0.23 vs 5.82
CFFN is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.4% yield, vs CZWI's 1.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.7% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.8x vs 11.9x), PEG 0.23 vs 5.82 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs HONE's 1.05, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield, vs CZWI's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.6% vs HONE's +7.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% |
TSBK vs CZWI vs HONE vs NECB vs CFFN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TSBK vs CZWI vs HONE vs NECB vs CFFN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NECB leads in 2 of 6 categories
TSBK leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • HONE leads 0 • CFFN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NECB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CFFN is the larger business by revenue, generating $417M annually — 4.6x CZWI's $90M. NECB is the more profitable business, keeping 28.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HONE's 8.7%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $110M | $90M | $314M | $157M | $417M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $40M | $9M | $37M | $63M | $97M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $31M | $14M | $26M | $44M | $73M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $40M | $11M | $46M | $51M | $61M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.1% | +54.7% | +50.9% | +66.1% | +47.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.8% | +7.0% | +10.9% | +39.6% | +19.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.4% | +16.0% | +8.7% | +28.2% | +16.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +11.5% | +0.8% | +32.3% | +11.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.9% | +63.0% | +11.1% | +6.8% | +33.3% |
Valuation Metrics
NECB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.5x trailing earnings, NECB trades at a 59% valuation discount to HONE's 18.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NECB offers better value at 0.22x vs CFFN's 7.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $327M | $203M | $522M | $339M | $1.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $99M | $136M | $808M | $333M | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.29x | 14.44x | 18.33x | 7.54x | 15.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.60x | 11.76x | 13.30x | 7.81x | 11.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.27x | 2.85x | 1.23x | 0.22x | 7.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.56x | 15.28x | 20.84x | 5.25x | 29.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.96x | 2.25x | 1.66x | 2.15x | 2.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.25x | 1.09x | 0.87x | 0.95x | 0.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.49x | 19.55x | 200.70x | 6.67x | 20.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TSBK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NECB delivers a 13.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $5 for HONE. TSBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CFFN's 1.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSBK scores 8/9 vs NECB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.7% | +7.8% | +4.6% | +13.1% | +7.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +0.8% | +0.5% | +2.2% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.8% | +2.0% | +2.3% | +12.5% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.0% | +0.6% | +3.5% | +16.2% | +2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.28x | 0.90x | 0.21x | 1.86x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$228M | -$67M | $285M | -$6M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $251M | $119M | $231M | $81M | $252M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $52M | $517M | $75M | $2.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.19x | 0.16x | 0.24x | 1.17x | 0.41x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NECB five years ago would be worth $22,024 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,144 for CFFN. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +45.6% total return vs HONE's +7.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs HONE's 16.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.1% | +21.5% | — | +9.4% | +20.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.9% | +45.6% | +7.9% | +10.7% | +44.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.3% | +160.0% | +58.9% | +107.8% | +60.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.0% | +71.2% | -5.8% | +120.2% | -18.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +250.8% | +157.0% | +88.3% | +460.8% | +12.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.0% | +37.5% | +16.7% | +27.6% | +17.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CZWI and CFFN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HONE's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CFFN currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs HONE's 84.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.73x | 0.45x | 1.04x | 0.81x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.77 | $22.62 | $14.29 | $25.61 | $7.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.30 | $12.83 | $10.57 | $19.27 | $5.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.7% | +93.2% | +84.7% | +95.7% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.1 | 63.7 | 32.5 | 50.5 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 35K | 40K | 0 | 36K | 926K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CZWI and CFFN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TSBK as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", HONE as "Hold", NECB as "Hold", CFFN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.7% upside for HONE (target: $14) vs -10.5% for CFFN (target: $7). For income investors, CFFN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.35% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $14.00 | — | $7.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | +1.8% | +2.6% | +4.0% | +4.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.02 | $0.37 | $0.32 | $0.98 | $0.34 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.8% | +3.1% | +4.1% | +0.5% | +0.4% |
NECB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TSBK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
TSBK vs CZWI vs HONE vs NECB vs CFFN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TSBK or CZWI or HONE or NECB or CFFN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HarborOne Bancorp, Inc.
(HONE) is the stronger pick with 10. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (7. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Timberland Bancorp, Inc. (TSBK) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TSBK or CZWI or HONE or NECB or CFFN?
On trailing P/E, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) is the cheapest at 7. 5x versus HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. at 18. 3x. On forward P/E, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. wins at 0. 23x versus Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. 's 5. 82x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TSBK or CZWI or HONE or NECB or CFFN?
Over the past 5 years, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) delivered a total return of +120. 2%, compared to -18. 6% for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. (CFFN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NECB returned +459. 8% versus CFFN's +12. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TSBK or CZWI or HONE or NECB or CFFN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 04β — meaning HONE is approximately 129% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Timberland Bancorp, Inc. (TSBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 186% for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TSBK or CZWI or HONE or NECB or CFFN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HarborOne Bancorp, Inc.
(HONE) is pulling ahead at 10. 7% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. grew EPS 79. 3% year-over-year, compared to -7. 7% for Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TSBK or CZWI or HONE or NECB or CFFN?
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 2% net margin versus 8. 7% for HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NECB leads at 39. 6% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TSBK leads at 70. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TSBK or CZWI or HONE or NECB or CFFN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 23x versus Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. 's 5. 82x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) trades at 7. 8x forward P/E versus 17. 6x for Timberland Bancorp, Inc. — 9. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HONE: 15. 7% to $14. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TSBK or CZWI or HONE or NECB or CFFN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. (CFFN) offers the highest yield at 4. 4%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is TSBK or CZWI or HONE or NECB or CFFN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45), 1. 8% yield, +161. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +161. 7%, CFFN: +12. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TSBK and CZWI and HONE and NECB and CFFN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TSBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; HONE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NECB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CFFN is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.