Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TSBK vs KRNY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
TSBK vs KRNY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $327M | $508M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $110M | $344M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $31M | $32M |
| Gross Margin | 70.1% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | 32.8% | 9.0% |
| Forward P/E | 17.8x | 12.9x |
| Total Debt | $23M | $1.26B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $251M | $167M |
TSBK vs KRNY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Timberland Bancorp,… (TSBK) | 100 | 230.6 | +130.6% |
| Kearny Financial Co… (KRNY) | 100 | 94.3 | -5.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TSBK vs KRNY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TSBK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 2.5%
- Rev growth 8.8%, EPS growth 21.9%
- 250.8% 10Y total return vs KRNY's -9.0%
KRNY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 0.83, yield 5.5%, current ratio 1.20x
- Lower P/E (12.9x vs 17.8x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs TSBK's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.8% NII/revenue growth vs KRNY's 5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.9x vs 17.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs TSBK's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.75 vs KRNY's 0.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.5% yield, vs TSBK's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.9% vs KRNY's +37.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs TSBK's 0.4% |
TSBK vs KRNY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TSBK vs KRNY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TSBK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KRNY is the larger business by revenue, generating $344M annually — 3.1x TSBK's $110M. TSBK is the more profitable business, keeping 26.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KRNY's 7.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $110M | $344M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $40M | $43M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $31M | $32M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $40M | $40M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.1% | +44.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.8% | +9.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.4% | +7.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +6.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.9% | +50.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TSBK and KRNY each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.3x trailing earnings, TSBK trades at a 41% valuation discount to KRNY's 19.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TSBK's 2.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KRNY's 44.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $327M | $508M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $99M | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.29x | 19.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.78x | 12.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.27x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.56x | 44.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.96x | 1.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.25x | 0.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.49x | 23.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TSBK leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TSBK delivers a 11.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $4 for KRNY. TSBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KRNY's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSBK scores 8/9 vs KRNY's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.7% | +4.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.8% | +1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.0% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 1.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$228M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $251M | $167M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.19x | 0.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TSBK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TSBK five years ago would be worth $15,804 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,946 for KRNY. Over the past 12 months, TSBK leads with a +39.9% total return vs KRNY's +37.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TSBK at 25.0% vs KRNY's 9.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.1% | +12.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.9% | +37.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.3% | +32.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.0% | -20.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +250.8% | -9.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.0% | +9.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TSBK and KRNY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TSBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KRNY's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.77 | $8.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.30 | $5.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.7% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.1 | 55.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 35K | 298K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TSBK and KRNY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TSBK as "Buy" and KRNY as "Hold". For income investors, KRNY offers the higher dividend yield at 5.45% vs TSBK's 2.45%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $9.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | +5.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.02 | $0.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.8% | +0.1% |
TSBK leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
TSBK vs KRNY: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TSBK or KRNY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Timberland Bancorp, Inc.
(TSBK) is the stronger pick with 8. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 1% for Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY). Timberland Bancorp, Inc. (TSBK) offers the better valuation at 11. 3x trailing P/E (17. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Timberland Bancorp, Inc. (TSBK) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TSBK or KRNY?
On trailing P/E, Timberland Bancorp, Inc.
(TSBK) is the cheapest at 11. 3x versus Kearny Financial Corp. at 19. 2x. On forward P/E, Kearny Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 12. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TSBK or KRNY?
Over the past 5 years, Timberland Bancorp, Inc.
(TSBK) delivered a total return of +58. 0%, compared to -20. 5% for Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TSBK returned +250. 8% versus KRNY's -9. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TSBK or KRNY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Timberland Bancorp, Inc.
(TSBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus Kearny Financial Corp. 's 0. 83β — meaning KRNY is approximately 11% more volatile than TSBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Timberland Bancorp, Inc. (TSBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 168% for Kearny Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TSBK or KRNY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Timberland Bancorp, Inc.
(TSBK) is pulling ahead at 8. 8% versus 5. 1% for Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kearny Financial Corp. grew EPS 130. 2% year-over-year, compared to 21. 9% for Timberland Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TSBK or KRNY?
Timberland Bancorp, Inc.
(TSBK) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 4% net margin versus 7. 6% for Kearny Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 26. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TSBK leads at 32. 8% versus 9. 0% for KRNY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TSBK leads at 70. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TSBK or KRNY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kearny Financial Corp.
(KRNY) trades at 12. 9x forward P/E versus 17. 8x for Timberland Bancorp, Inc. — 4. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — TSBK or KRNY?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY) offers the highest yield at 5. 5%, versus 2. 5% for Timberland Bancorp, Inc. (TSBK).
09Is TSBK or KRNY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Timberland Bancorp, Inc.
(TSBK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 2. 5% yield, +250. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TSBK: +250. 8%, KRNY: -9. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TSBK and KRNY?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TSBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; KRNY is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.