Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TSSI vs CLFD vs ERII vs PRIM vs MYRG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
TSSI vs CLFD vs ERII vs PRIM vs MYRG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Communication Equipment | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $457M | $519M | $498M | $5.86B | $6.65B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $202M | $136M | $127M | $7.49B | $3.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $-9M | $33M | $248M | $142M |
| Gross Margin | 15.3% | 37.2% | 64.5% | 10.4% | 11.9% |
| Operating Margin | 4.4% | 1.4% | 24.1% | 4.9% | 5.1% |
| Forward P/E | 47.3x | 72.1x | 22.9x | 18.1x | 44.0x |
| Total Debt | $42M | $9M | $9M | $1.28B | $104M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $86M | $21M | $48M | $541M | $150M |
TSSI vs CLFD vs ERII vs PRIM vs MYRG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSS, Inc. (TSSI) | 100 | 1721.7 | +1621.7% |
| Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) | 100 | 271.1 | +171.1% |
| Energy Recovery, In… (ERII) | 100 | 122.7 | +22.7% |
| Primoris Services C… (PRIM) | 100 | 647.2 | +547.2% |
| MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) | 100 | 1483.4 | +1383.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TSSI vs CLFD vs ERII vs PRIM vs MYRG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TSSI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.9%, EPS growth 154.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.2%
- 98.0% 10Y total return vs MYRG's 16.8%
- PEG 0.27 vs MYRG's 2.64
- 65.9% revenue growth vs ERII's -7.1%
Among these 5 stocks, CLFD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ERII carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.53, Low D/E 4.6%, current ratio 10.44x
- Beta 1.53, current ratio 10.44x
- 25.9% margin vs CLFD's -6.3%
- Beta 1.53 vs TSSI's 3.50, lower leverage
PRIM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (18.1x vs 44.0x), PEG 0.98 vs 2.64
- 0.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
MYRG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.70
- +175.2% vs ERII's -37.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.9% revenue growth vs ERII's -7.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.1x vs 44.0x), PEG 0.98 vs 2.64 | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.9% margin vs CLFD's -6.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.53 vs TSSI's 3.50, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +175.2% vs ERII's -37.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs CLFD's -3.0%, ROIC 10.3% vs 0.6% |
TSSI vs CLFD vs ERII vs PRIM vs MYRG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TSSI vs CLFD vs ERII vs PRIM vs MYRG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ERII leads in 1 of 6 categories
PRIM leads 1 • TSSI leads 1 • MYRG leads 1 • CLFD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ERII leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRIM is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 59.0x ERII's $127M. ERII is the more profitable business, keeping 25.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLFD's -6.3%. On growth, MYRG holds the edge at +20.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $202M | $136M | $127M | $7.5B | $3.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10M | $6M | $41M | $437M | $261M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | -$9M | $33M | $248M | $142M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | $15M | $27M | $165M | $231M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +37.2% | +64.5% | +10.4% | +11.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | +1.4% | +24.1% | +4.9% | +5.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | -6.3% | +25.9% | +3.3% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.5% | +10.8% | +21.4% | +2.2% | +6.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.1% | -27.1% | -97.5% | -5.4% | +20.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.3% | -142.5% | +100.0% | -60.5% | +106.2% |
Valuation Metrics
PRIM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.5x trailing earnings, PRIM trades at a 62% valuation discount to MYRG's 56.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TSSI offers better value at 0.15x vs MYRG's 3.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $457M | $519M | $498M | $5.9B | $6.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $413M | $506M | $460M | $6.6B | $6.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.97x | -64.64x | 22.45x | 21.52x | 56.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 47.28x | 72.10x | 22.91x | 18.06x | 44.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.15x | — | — | 1.17x | 3.40x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 35.23x | 61.46x | 16.23x | 13.03x | 28.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.86x | 3.46x | 3.70x | 0.77x | 1.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.11x | 2.05x | 2.48x | 3.52x | 10.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 215.64x | 21.01x | 28.57x | 17.20x | 28.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CLFD and MYRG each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TSSI delivers a 25.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-3 for CLFD. CLFD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRIM's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MYRG scores 8/9 vs PRIM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +25.3% | -3.4% | +17.4% | +15.2% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.0% | -3.0% | +15.2% | +5.6% | +8.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +32.3% | +0.6% | +10.3% | +13.6% | +18.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.0% | +0.8% | +11.3% | +16.3% | +19.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.03x | 0.05x | 0.76x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$44M | -$13M | -$39M | $735M | -$47M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $86M | $21M | $48M | $541M | $150M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $42M | $9M | $9M | $1.3B | $104M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.06x | 85.32x | — | 21.02x | 39.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TSSI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TSSI five years ago would be worth $273,198 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,567 for ERII. Over the past 12 months, MYRG leads with a +175.2% total return vs ERII's -37.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TSSI at 2.8% vs ERII's -26.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +106.0% | +27.1% | -31.3% | -17.2% | +88.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +127.9% | +20.2% | -37.3% | +62.4% | +175.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5362.1% | +3.9% | -60.0% | +346.5% | +219.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2632.0% | -4.1% | -54.3% | +234.4% | +417.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9800.0% | +106.7% | -11.9% | +402.0% | +1680.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.8% | +1.3% | -26.3% | +64.7% | +47.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ERII and MYRG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ERII is the less volatile stock with a 1.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TSSI's 3.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MYRG currently trades 89.9% from its 52-week high vs TSSI's 49.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.50x | 1.79x | 1.53x | 1.83x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.94 | $46.76 | $18.32 | $205.50 | $475.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.80 | $24.01 | $9.30 | $65.23 | $152.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.6% | +80.2% | +51.5% | +52.6% | +89.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.4 | 57.1 | 60.6 | 30.3 | 80.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 146K | 996K | 1.1M | 306K |
Analyst Outlook
MYRG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CLFD as "Buy", ERII as "Buy", PRIM as "Buy", MYRG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 48.7% upside for PRIM (target: $161) vs -15.3% for MYRG (target: $362). PRIM is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $43.00 | $13.00 | $160.63 | $362.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 | 16 | 22 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 2 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.32 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +3.2% | +7.2% | +0.2% | +1.2% |
ERII leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PRIM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TSSI vs CLFD vs ERII vs PRIM vs MYRG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TSSI or CLFD or ERII or PRIM or MYRG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TSS, Inc.
(TSSI) is the stronger pick with 65. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 1% for Energy Recovery, Inc. (ERII). Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) offers the better valuation at 21. 5x trailing P/E (18. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TSSI or CLFD or ERII or PRIM or MYRG?
On trailing P/E, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the cheapest at 21.
5x versus MYR Group Inc. at 56. 8x. On forward P/E, Primoris Services Corporation is actually cheaper at 18. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: TSS, Inc. wins at 0. 27x versus MYR Group Inc. 's 2. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TSSI or CLFD or ERII or PRIM or MYRG?
Over the past 5 years, TSS, Inc.
(TSSI) delivered a total return of +26. 3%, compared to -54. 3% for Energy Recovery, Inc. (ERII). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TSSI returned +98. 0% versus ERII's -11. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TSSI or CLFD or ERII or PRIM or MYRG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Energy Recovery, Inc.
(ERII) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 53β versus TSS, Inc. 's 3. 50β — meaning TSSI is approximately 129% more volatile than ERII relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 76% for Primoris Services Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TSSI or CLFD or ERII or PRIM or MYRG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TSS, Inc.
(TSSI) is pulling ahead at 65. 9% versus -7. 1% for Energy Recovery, Inc. (ERII). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MYR Group Inc. grew EPS 311. 5% year-over-year, compared to 5. 0% for Energy Recovery, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TSSI leads at 100. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TSSI or CLFD or ERII or PRIM or MYRG?
Energy Recovery, Inc.
(ERII) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 0% net margin versus -5. 4% for Clearfield, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ERII leads at 18. 2% versus 1. 4% for CLFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ERII leads at 65. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TSSI or CLFD or ERII or PRIM or MYRG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, TSS, Inc. (TSSI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 27x versus MYR Group Inc. 's 2. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) trades at 18. 1x forward P/E versus 72. 1x for Clearfield, Inc. — 54. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRIM: 48. 7% to $160. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — TSSI or CLFD or ERII or PRIM or MYRG?
In this comparison, PRIM (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. TSSI, CLFD, ERII, MYRG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TSSI or CLFD or ERII or PRIM or MYRG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MYR Group Inc.
(MYRG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1681% 10Y return). TSS, Inc. (TSSI) carries a higher beta of 3. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MYRG: +1681%, TSSI: +98. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TSSI and CLFD and ERII and PRIM and MYRG?
These companies operate in different sectors (TSSI (Technology) and CLFD (Technology) and ERII (Industrials) and PRIM (Industrials) and MYRG (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TSSI is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLFD is a small-cap high-growth stock; ERII is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRIM is a small-cap high-growth stock; MYRG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.