Construction Materials
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TTAM vs USLM vs MLM vs EXP vs VMC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction Materials
Construction Materials
Construction Materials
Construction Materials
TTAM vs USLM vs MLM vs EXP vs VMC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction Materials | Construction Materials | Construction Materials | Construction Materials | Construction Materials |
| Market Cap | $3.08B | $3.13B | $36.22B | $6.82B | $37.49B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.66B | $369M | $6.55B | $2.30B | $8.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $185M | $131M | $2.53B | $447M | $1.12B |
| Gross Margin | 26.1% | 48.1% | 29.6% | 29.0% | 27.6% |
| Operating Margin | 16.2% | 41.6% | 22.7% | 25.4% | 20.6% |
| Forward P/E | 15.1x | 20.1x | 30.8x | 16.4x | 31.4x |
| Total Debt | $462M | $4M | $5.32B | $1.28B | $5.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $212M | $371M | $67M | $20M | $183M |
TTAM vs USLM vs MLM vs EXP vs VMC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Titan America S.A. (TTAM) | 100 | 106.5 | +6.5% |
| United States Lime … (USLM) | 100 | 116.4 | +16.4% |
| Martin Marietta Mat… (MLM) | 100 | 124.3 | +24.3% |
| Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP) | 100 | 93.6 | -6.4% |
| Vulcan Materials Co… (VMC) | 100 | 116.8 | +16.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TTAM vs USLM vs MLM vs EXP vs VMC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TTAM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in dividends and momentum.
- 1.0% yield, vs VMC's 0.7%
- +23.0% vs EXP's -5.4%
USLM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 23.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.4%
- 9.5% 10Y total return vs MLM's 242.7%
- 17.3% revenue growth vs EXP's 0.1%
- 19.7% ROA vs VMC's 6.6%, ROIC 48.5% vs 8.8%
MLM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 53.0%, current ratio 3.57x
- Beta 0.87, yield 0.5%, current ratio 3.57x
- 38.7% margin vs TTAM's 11.1%
EXP is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.31 vs MLM's 3.00
- Lower P/E (16.4x vs 31.4x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.40
VMC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.80, yield 0.7%
- Beta 0.80 vs TTAM's 1.62
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.3% revenue growth vs EXP's 0.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.4x vs 31.4x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.40 | |
| Quality / Margins | 38.7% margin vs TTAM's 11.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs TTAM's 1.62 | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield, vs VMC's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.0% vs EXP's -5.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.7% ROA vs VMC's 6.6%, ROIC 48.5% vs 8.8% |
TTAM vs USLM vs MLM vs EXP vs VMC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TTAM vs USLM vs MLM vs EXP vs VMC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
USLM leads in 3 of 6 categories
TTAM leads 1 • VMC leads 1 • MLM leads 0 • EXP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
USLM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VMC is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.1B annually — 21.8x USLM's $369M. MLM is the more profitable business, keeping 38.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TTAM's 11.1%. On growth, VMC holds the edge at +7.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $369M | $6.6B | $2.3B | $8.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $379M | $173M | $2.1B | $748M | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $185M | $131M | $2.5B | $447M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $124M | $91M | $1.0B | $244M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +48.1% | +29.6% | +29.0% | +27.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +41.6% | +22.7% | +25.4% | +20.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +35.4% | +38.7% | +19.4% | +13.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.5% | +24.8% | +15.8% | +10.6% | +13.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.1% | -3.7% | +0.7% | +2.5% | +7.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.3% | -10.9% | +12.2% | -0.7% | +29.9% |
Valuation Metrics
TTAM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.4x trailing earnings, EXP trades at a 57% valuation discount to VMC's 35.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EXP offers better value at 0.29x vs MLM's 3.12x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $3.1B | $36.2B | $6.8B | $37.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $2.8B | $41.5B | $8.1B | $42.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.55x | 23.40x | 31.95x | 15.37x | 35.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.07x | 20.09x | 30.75x | 16.39x | 31.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.65x | 3.12x | 0.29x | 2.72x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.77x | 15.11x | 19.21x | 10.65x | 18.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.85x | 8.41x | 5.54x | 3.02x | 4.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.97x | 4.98x | 3.62x | 4.89x | 4.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.33x | 30.63x | 37.04x | 19.30x | 33.02x |
Profitability & Efficiency
USLM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EXP delivers a 29.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $13 for VMC. USLM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXP's 0.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VMC scores 9/9 vs EXP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.1% | +21.3% | +25.1% | +29.1% | +13.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.2% | +19.7% | +13.3% | +13.1% | +6.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.4% | +48.5% | +7.6% | +17.6% | +8.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.0% | +26.6% | +8.7% | +20.9% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.45x | 0.01x | 0.53x | 0.88x | 0.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $251M | -$367M | $5.3B | $1.3B | $5.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $212M | $371M | $67M | $20M | $183M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $462M | $4M | $5.3B | $1.3B | $5.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.98x | — | 6.44x | 9.77x | 4.13x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
USLM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in USLM five years ago would be worth $38,598 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,132 for TTAM. Over the past 12 months, TTAM leads with a +23.0% total return vs EXP's -5.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors USLM at 49.6% vs TTAM's 0.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.3% | -9.6% | -5.2% | +0.2% | -1.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.0% | +12.6% | +13.0% | -5.4% | +9.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.3% | +234.6% | +53.9% | +34.2% | +52.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.3% | +286.0% | +62.5% | +47.4% | +55.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.3% | +955.0% | +242.7% | +194.5% | +162.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.4% | +49.6% | +15.4% | +10.3% | +15.2% |
Risk & Volatility
VMC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VMC is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TTAM's 1.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VMC currently trades 87.3% from its 52-week high vs USLM's 77.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.62x | 1.32x | 0.87x | 1.29x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.42 | $141.44 | $710.97 | $243.64 | $331.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.18 | $94.02 | $532.80 | $171.99 | $252.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.1% | +77.3% | +84.5% | +86.9% | +87.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.1 | 29.9 | 51.6 | 64.8 | 55.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 296K | 139K | 485K | 390K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TTAM and VMC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TTAM as "Hold", USLM as "Buy", MLM as "Buy", EXP as "Buy", VMC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.3% upside for USLM (target: $138) vs 5.9% for EXP (target: $224). For income investors, TTAM offers the higher dividend yield at 0.96% vs USLM's 0.22%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.00 | $138.00 | $695.30 | $224.17 | $327.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 1 | 40 | 24 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +0.2% | +0.5% | +0.5% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.16 | $0.24 | $3.26 | $1.00 | $1.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | +1.2% | +4.5% | +1.2% |
USLM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TTAM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
TTAM vs USLM vs MLM vs EXP vs VMC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TTAM or USLM or MLM or EXP or VMC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.
(USLM) is the stronger pick with 17. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 1% for Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP). Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E (16. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TTAM or USLM or MLM or EXP or VMC?
On trailing P/E, Eagle Materials Inc.
(EXP) is the cheapest at 15. 4x versus Vulcan Materials Company at 35. 6x. On forward P/E, Titan America S. A. is actually cheaper at 15. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Eagle Materials Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. 's 3. 00x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TTAM or USLM or MLM or EXP or VMC?
Over the past 5 years, United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.
(USLM) delivered a total return of +286. 0%, compared to +1. 3% for Titan America S. A. (TTAM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: USLM returned +955. 0% versus TTAM's +1. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TTAM or USLM or MLM or EXP or VMC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vulcan Materials Company (VMC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus Titan America S. A. 's 1. 62β — meaning TTAM is approximately 103% more volatile than VMC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 88% for Eagle Materials Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TTAM or USLM or MLM or EXP or VMC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.
(USLM) is pulling ahead at 17. 3% versus 0. 1% for Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. grew EPS 23. 2% year-over-year, compared to -42. 0% for Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, USLM leads at 16. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TTAM or USLM or MLM or EXP or VMC?
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.
(USLM) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 0% net margin versus 11. 1% for Titan America S. A. — meaning it keeps 36. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: USLM leads at 42. 4% versus 16. 3% for TTAM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — USLM leads at 48. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TTAM or USLM or MLM or EXP or VMC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. 's 3. 00x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Titan America S. A. (TTAM) trades at 15. 1x forward P/E versus 31. 4x for Vulcan Materials Company — 16. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USLM: 26. 3% to $138. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TTAM or USLM or MLM or EXP or VMC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Titan America S. A. (TTAM) offers the highest yield at 1. 0%, versus 0. 2% for United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM).
09Is TTAM or USLM or MLM or EXP or VMC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Vulcan Materials Company (VMC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
80), 0. 7% yield, +162. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VMC: +162. 5%, EXP: +194. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TTAM and USLM and MLM and EXP and VMC?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TTAM is a small-cap deep-value stock; USLM is a small-cap high-growth stock; MLM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EXP is a small-cap deep-value stock; VMC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TTAM, MLM, VMC pay a dividend while USLM, EXP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.