TTAN vs FROG

For growth investors, ServiceTitan, Inc.

(TTAN) is the stronger pick with 329. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 24. 1% for JFrog Ltd. (FROG). Analysts rate ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, JFrog Ltd.

(FROG) delivered a total return of +58. 8%, compared to -35. 3% for ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FROG returned -12. 0% versus TTAN's -35. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ServiceTitan, Inc.

(TTAN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 91β versus JFrog Ltd. 's 1. 24β — meaning FROG is approximately 36% more volatile than TTAN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, JFrog Ltd. (FROG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 3% for ServiceTitan, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ServiceTitan, Inc.

(TTAN) is pulling ahead at 329. 0% versus 24. 1% for JFrog Ltd. (FROG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ServiceTitan, Inc. grew EPS 79. 7% year-over-year, compared to 1. 6% for JFrog Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTAN leads at 716. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

JFrog Ltd.

(FROG) is the more profitable company, earning -13. 5% net margin versus -16. 4% for ServiceTitan, Inc. — meaning it keeps -13. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FROG leads at -15. 7% versus -16. 8% for TTAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FROG leads at 76. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, JFrog Ltd.

(FROG) trades at 63. 4x forward P/E versus 70. 0x for ServiceTitan, Inc. — 6. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTAN: 84. 5% to $120. 50.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, ServiceTitan, Inc.

(TTAN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 91)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTAN: -35. 3%, FROG: -12. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.