TTAN vs FSV

For growth investors, ServiceTitan, Inc.

(TTAN) is the stronger pick with 329. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 8% for FirstService Corporation (FSV). FirstService Corporation (FSV) offers the better valuation at 42. 6x trailing P/E (21. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, FirstService Corporation is actually cheaper at 21.

9x.

Over the past 5 years, FirstService Corporation (FSV) delivered a total return of -14.

8%, compared to -35. 3% for ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FSV returned +213. 1% versus TTAN's -35. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FirstService Corporation (FSV) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

64β versus ServiceTitan, Inc. 's 0. 91β — meaning TTAN is approximately 43% more volatile than FSV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 87% for FirstService Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ServiceTitan, Inc.

(TTAN) is pulling ahead at 329. 0% versus 5. 8% for FirstService Corporation (FSV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ServiceTitan, Inc. grew EPS 79. 7% year-over-year, compared to 6. 4% for FirstService Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTAN leads at 716. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

FirstService Corporation (FSV) is the more profitable company, earning 2.

6% net margin versus -16. 4% for ServiceTitan, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSV leads at 6. 1% versus -16. 8% for TTAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TTAN leads at 69. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, FirstService Corporation (FSV) trades at 21.

9x forward P/E versus 70. 0x for ServiceTitan, Inc. — 48. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTAN: 84. 5% to $120. 50.

In this comparison, FSV (0.

8% yield) pays a dividend. TTAN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, FirstService Corporation (FSV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

64), 0. 8% yield, +213. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FSV: +213. 1%, TTAN: -35. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (TTAN (Technology) and FSV (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TTAN is a small-cap high-growth stock; FSV is a small-cap quality compounder stock. FSV pays a dividend while TTAN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.