Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TTAN vs NVDA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
TTAN vs NVDA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $5.27B | $5.14T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $943M | $215.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-41.86B | $120.07B |
| Gross Margin | 69.9% | 71.1% |
| Operating Margin | -16.8% | 60.4% |
| Forward P/E | 70.0x | 25.6x |
| Total Debt | $51.37B | $11.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $428.77B | $10.61B |
TTAN vs NVDA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 157.5 | +57.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TTAN vs NVDA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TTAN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.91
- Rev growth 329.0%, EPS growth 79.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.91, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 3.49x
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 239.0% 10Y total return vs TTAN's -35.3%
- Lower P/E (25.6x vs 70.0x)
- 55.6% margin vs TTAN's -16.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 329.0% revenue growth vs NVDA's 65.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.6x vs 70.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs TTAN's -16.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.91 vs NVDA's 1.73, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.7% vs TTAN's -43.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs TTAN's -9.6%, ROIC 81.8% vs -5.6% |
TTAN vs NVDA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TTAN vs NVDA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 229.1x TTAN's $943M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TTAN's -16.4%. On growth, TTAN holds the edge at +1212.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $943M | $215.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$42.6B | $133.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$41.9B | $120.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39.9B | $96.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.9% | +71.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -16.8% | +60.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -16.4% | +55.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +44.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1212.6% | +73.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +84.3% | +97.8% |
Valuation Metrics
TTAN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.3B | $5.14T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$372.1B | $5.14T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -37.75x | 43.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 70.00x | 25.55x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 38.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 23.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 32.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.13x | 53.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $-11 for TTAN. TTAN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVDA's 0.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TTAN scores 5/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.9% | +76.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.6% | +58.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.6% | +81.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.4% | +97.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$377.4B | $807M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $428.8B | $10.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $51.4B | $11.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 545.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $142,893 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,465 for TTAN. Over the past 12 months, NVDA leads with a +80.7% total return vs TTAN's -43.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 93.6% vs TTAN's -13.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -35.7% | +12.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -43.7% | +80.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.3% | +625.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.3% | +1328.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.3% | +23902.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.5% | +93.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TTAN and NVDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TTAN is the less volatile stock with a 0.91 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVDA's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs TTAN's 49.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.91x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $131.33 | $216.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $55.26 | $112.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.7% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.5 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 164.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TTAN as "Buy" and NVDA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 84.5% upside for TTAN (target: $121) vs 31.8% for NVDA (target: $279).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $120.50 | $278.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 79 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TTAN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
TTAN vs NVDA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TTAN or NVDA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ServiceTitan, Inc.
(TTAN) is the stronger pick with 329. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 65. 5% for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) offers the better valuation at 43. 2x trailing P/E (25. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TTAN or NVDA?
On forward P/E, NVIDIA Corporation is actually cheaper at 25.
6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TTAN or NVDA?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1329%, compared to -35.
3% for ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +239. 0% versus TTAN's -35. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TTAN or NVDA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ServiceTitan, Inc.
(TTAN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 91β versus NVIDIA Corporation's 1. 73β — meaning NVDA is approximately 89% more volatile than TTAN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 7% for NVIDIA Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TTAN or NVDA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ServiceTitan, Inc.
(TTAN) is pulling ahead at 329. 0% versus 65. 5% for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ServiceTitan, Inc. grew EPS 79. 7% year-over-year, compared to 66. 7% for NVIDIA Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTAN leads at 716. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TTAN or NVDA?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -16. 4% for ServiceTitan, Inc. — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -16. 8% for TTAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TTAN or NVDA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) trades at 25.
6x forward P/E versus 70. 0x for ServiceTitan, Inc. — 44. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTAN: 84. 5% to $120. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — TTAN or NVDA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TTAN or NVDA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ServiceTitan, Inc.
(TTAN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 91)). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTAN: -35. 3%, NVDA: +239. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TTAN and NVDA?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.