Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TTI vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
TTI vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $1.32B | $58M | $427M | $1.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $630M | $637M | $571M | $1.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $-77M | $-41M | $-12M |
| Gross Margin | 24.6% | 21.2% | 11.5% | 8.3% |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | 10.2% | 2.0% | -1.1% |
| Forward P/E | 41.4x | — | — | 1993.6x |
| Total Debt | $263M | $318M | $383M | $249M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $45M | $6M | $18M | $91M |
TTI vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TETRA Technologies,… (TTI) | 100 | 2959.1 | +2859.1% |
| KLX Energy Services… (KLXE) | 100 | 44.1 | -55.9% |
| Nine Energy Service… (NINE) | 100 | 485.2 | +385.2% |
| ProPetro Holding Co… (PUMP) | 100 | 314.1 | +214.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TTI vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TTI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.46
- Rev growth 5.3%, EPS growth -97.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.5%
- 96.4% 10Y total return vs NINE's -62.3%
- Beta 1.46, current ratio 2.02x
KLXE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.
- Beta 0.76 vs NINE's 3.21
NINE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +15.1% vs KLXE's +65.5%
PUMP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 30.0%, current ratio 1.29x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.3% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.2% margin vs KLXE's -12.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs NINE's 3.21 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.1% vs KLXE's +65.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.1% ROA vs KLXE's -21.3%, ROIC 9.5% vs -9.4% |
TTI vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TTI vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TTI leads in 2 of 6 categories
KLXE leads 0 • NINE leads 0 • PUMP leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TTI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PUMP is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 2.1x NINE's $571M. TTI is the more profitable business, keeping 1.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KLXE's -12.1%. On growth, TTI holds the edge at -0.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $630M | $637M | $571M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $90M | $160M | $61M | $154M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | -$77M | -$41M | -$12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | -$42M | -$7M | -$11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | +21.2% | +11.5% | +8.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +10.2% | +2.0% | -1.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | -12.1% | -7.2% | -1.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | -6.5% | -1.2% | -0.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.6% | -5.3% | -4.4% | -24.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +13.3% | -34.6% | -134.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — KLXE and PUMP each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 439.9x trailing earnings, TTI trades at a 78% valuation discount to PUMP's 1993.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KLXE's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NINE's 337.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $58M | $427M | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $371M | $791M | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 439.86x | -0.79x | -7.88x | 1993.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 41.38x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.93x | 5.71x | 337.01x | 10.67x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.09x | 0.09x | — | 1.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.67x | — | — | 1.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 67.62x | — | — | 44.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TTI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TTI delivers a 2.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-1 for PUMP. PUMP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TTI's 0.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PUMP scores 5/9 vs NINE's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.5% | — | — | -1.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | -21.3% | -11.5% | -1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.5% | -9.4% | +0.7% | +1.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.7% | -11.4% | +0.9% | +1.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.93x | — | — | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $218M | $313M | $364M | $158M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $45M | $6M | $18M | $91M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $263M | $318M | $383M | $249M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.96x | -0.67x | 0.24x | -0.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TTI and NINE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NINE five years ago would be worth $48,522 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,717 for KLXE. Over the past 12 months, NINE leads with a +1505.8% total return vs KLXE's +65.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TTI at 48.9% vs KLXE's -31.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.3% | +68.0% | +2682.5% | +58.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +246.3% | +65.5% | +1505.8% | +201.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +229.9% | -68.3% | +150.0% | +132.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +183.0% | -72.8% | +385.2% | +41.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +96.4% | -97.6% | -62.3% | +7.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +48.9% | -31.8% | +35.7% | +32.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KLXE and NINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KLXE is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NINE's 3.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NINE currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs TTI's 77.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.46x | 0.76x | 3.21x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.54 | $4.06 | $10.23 | $18.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.63 | $1.46 | $0.00 | $4.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.9% | +80.3% | +96.3% | +84.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.6 | 56.9 | 82.9 | 51.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 307K | 125K | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TTI as "Buy", NINE as "Hold", PUMP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 82.7% upside for NINE (target: $18) vs -5.1% for PUMP (target: $15).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.25 | — | $18.00 | $14.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 31 | — | 9 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TTI leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
TTI vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TTI or KLXE or NINE or PUMP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TETRA Technologies, Inc.
(TTI) is the stronger pick with 5. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) offers the better valuation at 439. 9x trailing P/E (41. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TETRA Technologies, Inc. (TTI) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TTI or KLXE or NINE or PUMP?
On trailing P/E, TETRA Technologies, Inc.
(TTI) is the cheapest at 439. 9x versus ProPetro Holding Corp. at 1993. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TTI or KLXE or NINE or PUMP?
Over the past 5 years, Nine Energy Service, Inc.
(NINE) delivered a total return of +385. 2%, compared to -72. 8% for KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. (KLXE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTI returned +96. 4% versus KLXE's -97. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TTI or KLXE or NINE or PUMP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.
(KLXE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Nine Energy Service, Inc. 's 3. 21β — meaning NINE is approximately 321% more volatile than KLXE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 93% for TETRA Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TTI or KLXE or NINE or PUMP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TETRA Technologies, Inc.
(TTI) is pulling ahead at 5. 3% versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ProPetro Holding Corp. grew EPS 100. 6% year-over-year, compared to -97. 3% for TETRA Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTI leads at 4. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TTI or KLXE or NINE or PUMP?
TETRA Technologies, Inc.
(TTI) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 5% net margin versus -12. 1% for KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TTI leads at 9. 4% versus -4. 8% for KLXE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TTI leads at 25. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TTI or KLXE or NINE or PUMP more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NINE: 82.
7% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TTI or KLXE or NINE or PUMP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TTI or KLXE or NINE or PUMP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc.
(KLXE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76)). Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) carries a higher beta of 3. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KLXE: -97. 6%, NINE: -62. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TTI and KLXE and NINE and PUMP?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.