Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TTSH vs AMWD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TTSH
Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.

Home Improvement

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$112M
5Y Perf.+118.8%
AMWD
American Woodmark Corporation

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$566M
5Y Perf.-38.1%

TTSH vs AMWD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TTSH logoTTSH
AMWD logoAMWD
IndustryHome ImprovementFurnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Market Cap$112M$566M
Revenue (TTM)$337M$1.52B
Net Income (TTM)$-4M$18M
Gross Margin63.8%15.3%
Operating Margin-1.7%1.9%
Forward P/E12.7x15.9x
Total Debt$160M$510M
Cash & Equiv.$10M$48M

TTSH vs AMWDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TTSH
AMWD
StockMay 20May 26Return
Tile Shop Holdings,… (TTSH)100218.8+118.8%
American Woodmark C… (AMWD)10061.9-38.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TTSH vs AMWD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TTSH and AMWD are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. American Woodmark Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TTSH
Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

TTSH has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.73
  • Rev growth -3.0%, EPS growth -289.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.73, current ratio 1.43x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
AMWD
American Woodmark Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

AMWD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • -48.0% 10Y total return vs TTSH's -77.1%
  • 1.2% margin vs TTSH's -1.3%
  • -34.2% vs TTSH's -47.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTTSH logoTTSH-3.0% revenue growth vs AMWD's -7.5%
ValueTTSH logoTTSHLower P/E (12.7x vs 15.9x)
Quality / MarginsAMWD logoAMWD1.2% margin vs TTSH's -1.3%
Stability / SafetyTTSH logoTTSHBeta 0.73 vs AMWD's 1.49
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)AMWD logoAMWD-34.2% vs TTSH's -47.4%
Efficiency (ROA)AMWD logoAMWD1.2% ROA vs TTSH's -1.4%, ROIC 7.8% vs -1.8%

TTSH vs AMWD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAMWDLAGGINGTTSH

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AMWD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

AMWD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 4.5x TTSH's $337M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.2% (AMWD) to -1.3% (TTSH). On growth, TTSH holds the edge at -2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTTSH logoTTSHTile Shop Holding…AMWD logoAMWDAmerican Woodmark…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$337M$1.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$18M$92M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$4M$18M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0$64M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+63.8%+15.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-1.7%+1.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-1.3%+1.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-1.1%+4.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.5%-18.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-4.4%-2.3%
AMWD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TTSH leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, AMWD's 5.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TTSH's 25.7x.

MetricTTSH logoTTSHTile Shop Holding…AMWD logoAMWDAmerican Woodmark…
Market CapShares × price$112M$566M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$261M$1.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-28.00x5.98x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.12.73x15.86x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.75x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple25.71x5.26x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.33x0.33x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.40x0.65x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.62x
TTSH leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AMWD leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

AMWD delivers a 1.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-4 for TTSH. AMWD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TTSH's 1.83x.

MetricTTSH logoTTSHTile Shop Holding…AMWD logoAMWDAmerican Woodmark…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-3.9%+1.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-1.4%+1.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-1.8%+7.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-2.5%+10.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–944
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.83x0.56x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$150M$462M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$10M$48M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$160M$510M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-44.75x4.75x
AMWD leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AMWD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TTSH five years ago would be worth $5,468 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,917 for AMWD. Over the past 12 months, AMWD leads with a -34.2% total return vs TTSH's -47.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMWD at -8.5% vs TTSH's -14.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTTSH logoTTSHTile Shop Holding…AMWD logoAMWDAmerican Woodmark…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-23.3%-29.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-47.4%-34.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-37.9%-23.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-45.3%-60.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-77.1%-48.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-14.7%-8.5%
AMWD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TTSH and AMWD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TTSH is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMWD's 1.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMWD currently trades 53.9% from its 52-week high vs TTSH's 38.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTTSH logoTTSHTile Shop Holding…AMWD logoAMWDAmerican Woodmark…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.73x1.49x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$7.25$72.16
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.75$35.53
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+38.6%+53.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10035.343.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded9K224K
Evenly matched — TTSH and AMWD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

TTSH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates TTSH as "Hold" and AMWD as "Hold".

MetricTTSH logoTTSHTile Shop Holding…AMWD logoAMWDAmerican Woodmark…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$47.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1010
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+28.7%+4.9%
TTSH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

AMWD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TTSH leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallAmerican Woodmark Corporati… (AMWD)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TTSH vs AMWD: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TTSH or AMWD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.

(TTSH) is the stronger pick with -3. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 5% for American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD). American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. (TTSH) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TTSH or AMWD?

On forward P/E, Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 12. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TTSH or AMWD?

Over the past 5 years, Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.

(TTSH) delivered a total return of -45. 3%, compared to -60. 8% for American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMWD returned -48. 0% versus TTSH's -77. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TTSH or AMWD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.

(TTSH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus American Woodmark Corporation's 1. 49β — meaning AMWD is approximately 103% more volatile than TTSH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 183% for Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TTSH or AMWD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.

(TTSH) is pulling ahead at -3. 0% versus -7. 5% for American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Woodmark Corporation grew EPS -9. 1% year-over-year, compared to -289. 0% for Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMWD leads at -2. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TTSH or AMWD?

American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) is the more profitable company, earning 5.

8% net margin versus -1. 3% for Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMWD leads at 8. 2% versus -1. 7% for TTSH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TTSH leads at 63. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TTSH or AMWD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.

(TTSH) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for American Woodmark Corporation — 3. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TTSH or AMWD?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is TTSH or AMWD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.

(TTSH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTSH: -77. 1%, AMWD: -48. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TTSH and AMWD?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TTSH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMWD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

TTSH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMWD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TTSH and AMWD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TTSH: -2.5% · AMWD: -18.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.