Home Improvement
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TTSH vs AMWD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
TTSH vs AMWD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Home Improvement | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $112M | $566M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $337M | $1.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $18M |
| Gross Margin | 63.8% | 15.3% |
| Operating Margin | -1.7% | 1.9% |
| Forward P/E | 12.7x | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $160M | $510M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $48M |
TTSH vs AMWD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tile Shop Holdings,… (TTSH) | 100 | 218.8 | +118.8% |
| American Woodmark C… (AMWD) | 100 | 61.9 | -38.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TTSH vs AMWD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TTSH has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.73
- Rev growth -3.0%, EPS growth -289.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, current ratio 1.43x
AMWD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -48.0% 10Y total return vs TTSH's -77.1%
- 1.2% margin vs TTSH's -1.3%
- -34.2% vs TTSH's -47.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -3.0% revenue growth vs AMWD's -7.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 15.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.2% margin vs TTSH's -1.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs AMWD's 1.49 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -34.2% vs TTSH's -47.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.2% ROA vs TTSH's -1.4%, ROIC 7.8% vs -1.8% |
TTSH vs AMWD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMWD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMWD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 4.5x TTSH's $337M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.2% (AMWD) to -1.3% (TTSH). On growth, TTSH holds the edge at -2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $337M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $18M | $92M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $18M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $64M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.8% | +15.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | +1.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.3% | +1.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.1% | +4.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | -18.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.4% | -2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
TTSH leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, AMWD's 5.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TTSH's 25.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $112M | $566M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $261M | $1.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -28.00x | 5.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.73x | 15.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.75x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 25.71x | 5.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.33x | 0.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.40x | 0.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMWD leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMWD delivers a 1.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-4 for TTSH. AMWD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TTSH's 1.83x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.9% | +1.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.4% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.8% | +7.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.5% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.83x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $150M | $462M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $48M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $160M | $510M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -44.75x | 4.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMWD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TTSH five years ago would be worth $5,468 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,917 for AMWD. Over the past 12 months, AMWD leads with a -34.2% total return vs TTSH's -47.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMWD at -8.5% vs TTSH's -14.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.3% | -29.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -47.4% | -34.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.9% | -23.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.3% | -60.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.1% | -48.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.7% | -8.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TTSH and AMWD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TTSH is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMWD's 1.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMWD currently trades 53.9% from its 52-week high vs TTSH's 38.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.73x | 1.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.25 | $72.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.75 | $35.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +38.6% | +53.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.3 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9K | 224K |
Analyst Outlook
TTSH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TTSH as "Hold" and AMWD as "Hold".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $47.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +28.7% | +4.9% |
AMWD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TTSH leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
TTSH vs AMWD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TTSH or AMWD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.
(TTSH) is the stronger pick with -3. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 5% for American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD). American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. (TTSH) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TTSH or AMWD?
On forward P/E, Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 12. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TTSH or AMWD?
Over the past 5 years, Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.
(TTSH) delivered a total return of -45. 3%, compared to -60. 8% for American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMWD returned -48. 0% versus TTSH's -77. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TTSH or AMWD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.
(TTSH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus American Woodmark Corporation's 1. 49β — meaning AMWD is approximately 103% more volatile than TTSH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 183% for Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TTSH or AMWD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.
(TTSH) is pulling ahead at -3. 0% versus -7. 5% for American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Woodmark Corporation grew EPS -9. 1% year-over-year, compared to -289. 0% for Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMWD leads at -2. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TTSH or AMWD?
American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
8% net margin versus -1. 3% for Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMWD leads at 8. 2% versus -1. 7% for TTSH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TTSH leads at 63. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TTSH or AMWD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.
(TTSH) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for American Woodmark Corporation — 3. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — TTSH or AMWD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TTSH or AMWD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.
(TTSH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTSH: -77. 1%, AMWD: -48. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TTSH and AMWD?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TTSH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMWD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.