Solar
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TURB vs ENPH vs SEDG vs SHLS vs FSLR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Solar
Solar
Solar
Solar
TURB vs ENPH vs SEDG vs SHLS vs FSLR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Solar | Solar | Solar | Solar | Solar |
| Market Cap | $3M | $4.80B | $2.51B | $1.48B | $23.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9M | $1.40B | $1.28B | $536M | $5.42B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $135M | $-364M | $34M | $1.67B |
| Gross Margin | 3.6% | 44.2% | 18.2% | 33.5% | 41.7% |
| Operating Margin | -42.2% | 6.8% | -17.9% | 11.2% | 33.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.0x | — | 21.5x | 12.4x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $1.24B | $423M | $175M | $499M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $474M | $540M | $7M | $2.80B |
TURB vs ENPH vs SEDG vs SHLS vs FSLR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turbo Energy, S.A. … (TURB) | 100 | 55.0 | -45.0% |
| Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) | 100 | 30.3 | -69.7% |
| SolarEdge Technolog… (SEDG) | 100 | 31.9 | -68.1% |
| Shoals Technologies… (SHLS) | 100 | 48.4 | -51.6% |
| First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) | 100 | 136.1 | +36.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TURB vs ENPH vs SEDG vs SHLS vs FSLR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TURB plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
ENPH is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 17.9% 10Y total return vs FSLR's 334.7%
SEDG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 31.4%, EPS growth 78.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -27.5%
- 31.4% revenue growth vs TURB's -28.1%
- +125.8% vs TURB's -49.6%
SHLS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.23
FSLR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.36, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 2.67x
- PEG 0.40 vs ENPH's 2.86
- Beta 1.36, current ratio 2.67x
- Lower P/E (12.4x vs 21.5x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.4% revenue growth vs TURB's -28.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.4x vs 21.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.7% margin vs TURB's -35.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.36 vs SHLS's 2.23, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +125.8% vs TURB's -49.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.6% ROA vs TURB's -23.9%, ROIC 17.6% vs -42.0% |
TURB vs ENPH vs SEDG vs SHLS vs FSLR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TURB vs ENPH vs SEDG vs SHLS vs FSLR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FSLR leads in 4 of 6 categories
SHLS leads 1 • TURB leads 0 • ENPH leads 0 • SEDG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FSLR is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.4B annually — 575.5x TURB's $9M. FSLR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TURB's -35.4%. On growth, SHLS holds the edge at +74.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9M | $1.4B | $1.3B | $536M | $5.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $171M | -$210M | $73M | $2.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $135M | -$364M | $34M | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $145M | $78M | -$77M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +44.2% | +18.2% | +33.5% | +41.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -42.2% | +6.8% | -17.9% | +11.2% | +33.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -35.4% | +9.6% | -28.6% | +6.3% | +30.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | +10.4% | +6.1% | -14.5% | +30.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -63.2% | -20.6% | +41.5% | +74.9% | +23.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.6% | -127.3% | +43.5% | — | +65.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, FSLR trades at a 65% valuation discount to SHLS's 44.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FSLR offers better value at 0.50x vs ENPH's 4.48x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $4.8B | $2.5B | $1.5B | $23.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $5.6B | $2.4B | $1.7B | $21.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.76x | 28.26x | -5.99x | 44.20x | 15.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.04x | — | 21.48x | 12.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.48x | — | — | 0.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 22.72x | — | 25.41x | 9.64x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.27x | 3.26x | 2.12x | 3.12x | 4.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 4.52x | 5.78x | 2.48x | 2.48x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 50.09x | 31.09x | — | 19.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-85 for TURB. FSLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TURB's 2.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SEDG scores 7/9 vs TURB's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -84.7% | +13.3% | -79.6% | +5.7% | +18.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.9% | +4.2% | -15.9% | +3.7% | +12.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -42.0% | +6.8% | -29.5% | +5.9% | +17.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -89.9% | +6.8% | -19.2% | +7.6% | +15.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.01x | 1.14x | 0.99x | 0.29x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | $769M | -$116M | $168M | -$2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $474M | $540M | $7M | $2.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $1.2B | $423M | $175M | $499M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.39x | 47.60x | -2.65x | 5.91x | 53.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FSLR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FSLR five years ago would be worth $30,468 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,936 for SEDG. Over the past 12 months, SEDG leads with a +125.8% total return vs TURB's -49.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSLR at 7.4% vs SEDG's -47.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +33.3% | +8.0% | +31.7% | -2.8% | -19.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -49.6% | -25.7% | +125.8% | +83.4% | +64.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.5% | -77.7% | -85.8% | -55.2% | +23.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.5% | -69.1% | -80.6% | -70.0% | +204.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.5% | +1788.6% | +82.8% | -71.5% | +334.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.7% | -39.3% | -47.9% | -23.5% | +7.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TURB and SHLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TURB is the less volatile stock with a -1.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHLS's 2.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHLS currently trades 77.8% from its 52-week high vs TURB's 6.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -1.42x | 1.69x | 1.98x | 2.23x | 1.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.45 | $54.43 | $53.75 | $11.36 | $285.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.57 | $25.78 | $13.73 | $3.81 | $127.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.5% | +67.0% | +76.8% | +77.8% | +76.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.6 | 51.1 | 42.6 | 54.8 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.2M | 5.8M | 3.6M | 5.1M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ENPH as "Hold", SEDG as "Hold", SHLS as "Buy", FSLR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.4% upside for ENPH (target: $42) vs -16.5% for SEDG (target: $35).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $42.41 | $34.50 | $8.75 | $251.82 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 55 | 48 | 23 | 73 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 3 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.7% | 0.0% | +0.0% | +0.1% |
FSLR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SHLS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
TURB vs ENPH vs SEDG vs SHLS vs FSLR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TURB or ENPH or SEDG or SHLS or FSLR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
(SEDG) is the stronger pick with 31. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 1% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares (TURB). First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TURB or ENPH or SEDG or SHLS or FSLR?
On trailing P/E, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. at 44. 2x. On forward P/E, First Solar, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First Solar, Inc. wins at 0. 40x versus Enphase Energy, Inc. 's 2. 86x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TURB or ENPH or SEDG or SHLS or FSLR?
Over the past 5 years, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) delivered a total return of +204. 7%, compared to -80. 6% for SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. (SEDG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENPH returned +1789% versus TURB's -73. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TURB or ENPH or SEDG or SHLS or FSLR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Turbo Energy, S.
A. American Depositary Shares (TURB) is the lower-risk stock at -1. 42β versus Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. 's 2. 23β — meaning SHLS is approximately -257% more volatile than TURB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 2% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TURB or ENPH or SEDG or SHLS or FSLR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
(SEDG) is pulling ahead at 31. 4% versus -28. 1% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares (TURB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 78. 2% year-over-year, compared to -50. 0% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, FSLR leads at 25. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TURB or ENPH or SEDG or SHLS or FSLR?
First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -35. 4% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSLR leads at 32. 3% versus -42. 2% for TURB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ENPH leads at 46. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TURB or ENPH or SEDG or SHLS or FSLR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 40x versus Enphase Energy, Inc. 's 2. 86x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) trades at 12. 4x forward P/E versus 21. 5x for Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. — 9. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ENPH: 16. 4% to $42. 41.
08Which pays a better dividend — TURB or ENPH or SEDG or SHLS or FSLR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TURB or ENPH or SEDG or SHLS or FSLR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Turbo Energy, S.
A. American Depositary Shares (TURB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1. 42)). Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) carries a higher beta of 2. 23 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TURB: -73. 5%, SHLS: -71. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TURB and ENPH and SEDG and SHLS and FSLR?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TURB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ENPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SEDG is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock; FSLR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.