Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TURB vs ENPH vs SEDG vs SHLS vs FSLR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TURB
Turbo Energy, S.A. American Depositary Shares

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-45.0%
ENPH
Enphase Energy, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.80B
5Y Perf.-69.7%
SEDG
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$2.51B
5Y Perf.-68.1%
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.48B
5Y Perf.-51.6%
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$23.63B
5Y Perf.+36.1%

TURB vs ENPH vs SEDG vs SHLS vs FSLR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TURB logoTURB
ENPH logoENPH
SEDG logoSEDG
SHLS logoSHLS
FSLR logoFSLR
IndustrySolarSolarSolarSolarSolar
Market Cap$3M$4.80B$2.51B$1.48B$23.63B
Revenue (TTM)$9M$1.40B$1.28B$536M$5.42B
Net Income (TTM)$-3M$135M$-364M$34M$1.67B
Gross Margin3.6%44.2%18.2%33.5%41.7%
Operating Margin-42.2%6.8%-17.9%11.2%33.0%
Forward P/E18.0x21.5x12.4x
Total Debt$5M$1.24B$423M$175M$499M
Cash & Equiv.$2M$474M$540M$7M$2.80B

TURB vs ENPH vs SEDG vs SHLS vs FSLRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TURB
ENPH
SEDG
SHLS
FSLR
StockSep 23May 26Return
Turbo Energy, S.A. … (TURB)10055.0-45.0%
Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH)10030.3-69.7%
SolarEdge Technolog… (SEDG)10031.9-68.1%
Shoals Technologies… (SHLS)10048.4-51.6%
First Solar, Inc. (FSLR)100136.1+36.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TURB vs ENPH vs SEDG vs SHLS vs FSLR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FSLR leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TURB
Turbo Energy, S.A. American Depositary Shares
The Lower-Volatility Pick

TURB plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: energy exposure
ENPH
Enphase Energy, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

ENPH is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 17.9% 10Y total return vs FSLR's 334.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
SEDG
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
The Growth Play

SEDG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 31.4%, EPS growth 78.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -27.5%
  • 31.4% revenue growth vs TURB's -28.1%
  • +125.8% vs TURB's -49.6%
Best for: growth exposure
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
The Income Pick

SHLS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.23
Best for: income & stability
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

FSLR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.36, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 2.67x
  • PEG 0.40 vs ENPH's 2.86
  • Beta 1.36, current ratio 2.67x
  • Lower P/E (12.4x vs 21.5x)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSEDG logoSEDG31.4% revenue growth vs TURB's -28.1%
ValueFSLR logoFSLRLower P/E (12.4x vs 21.5x)
Quality / MarginsFSLR logoFSLR30.7% margin vs TURB's -35.4%
Stability / SafetyFSLR logoFSLRBeta 1.36 vs SHLS's 2.23, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)SEDG logoSEDG+125.8% vs TURB's -49.6%
Efficiency (ROA)FSLR logoFSLR12.6% ROA vs TURB's -23.9%, ROIC 17.6% vs -42.0%

TURB vs ENPH vs SEDG vs SHLS vs FSLR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TURBTurbo Energy, S.A. American Depositary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

ENPHEnphase Energy, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$1.5B
SEDGSolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Optimizers
54.5%$490M
Inverters
37.1%$334M
Other Products
5.9%$53M
Energy Storage Systems
1.8%$16M
Communication
0.7%$6M
SHLSShoals Technologies Group, Inc.
FY 2025
System Solutions
78.7%$374M
Components
21.3%$101M
FSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
FY 2025
Solar Module
100.0%$15.0B

TURB vs ENPH vs SEDG vs SHLS vs FSLR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFSLRLAGGINGSEDG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

FSLR is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.4B annually — 575.5x TURB's $9M. FSLR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TURB's -35.4%. On growth, SHLS holds the edge at +74.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTURB logoTURBTurbo Energy, S.A…ENPH logoENPHEnphase Energy, I…SEDG logoSEDGSolarEdge Technol…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$9M$1.4B$1.3B$536M$5.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$171M-$210M$73M$2.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$135M-$364M$34M$1.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$145M$78M-$77M$1.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+3.6%+44.2%+18.2%+33.5%+41.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-42.2%+6.8%-17.9%+11.2%+33.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-35.4%+9.6%-28.6%+6.3%+30.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-0.7%+10.4%+6.1%-14.5%+30.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-63.2%-20.6%+41.5%+74.9%+23.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.6%-127.3%+43.5%+65.1%
FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 15.5x trailing earnings, FSLR trades at a 65% valuation discount to SHLS's 44.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FSLR offers better value at 0.50x vs ENPH's 4.48x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricTURB logoTURBTurbo Energy, S.A…ENPH logoENPHEnphase Energy, I…SEDG logoSEDGSolarEdge Technol…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$3M$4.8B$2.5B$1.5B$23.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6M$5.6B$2.4B$1.7B$21.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.76x28.26x-5.99x44.20x15.48x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.18.04x21.48x12.39x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.48x0.50x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple22.72x25.41x9.64x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.27x3.26x2.12x3.12x4.53x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.95x4.52x5.78x2.48x2.48x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF50.09x31.09x19.91x
FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

FSLR delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-85 for TURB. FSLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TURB's 2.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SEDG scores 7/9 vs TURB's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricTURB logoTURBTurbo Energy, S.A…ENPH logoENPHEnphase Energy, I…SEDG logoSEDGSolarEdge Technol…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-84.7%+13.3%-79.6%+5.7%+18.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-23.9%+4.2%-15.9%+3.7%+12.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-42.0%+6.8%-29.5%+5.9%+17.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-89.9%+6.8%-19.2%+7.6%+15.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–926757
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.01x1.14x0.99x0.29x0.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3M$769M-$116M$168M-$2.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2M$474M$540M$7M$2.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5M$1.2B$423M$175M$499M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-10.39x47.60x-2.65x5.91x53.51x
FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FSLR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FSLR five years ago would be worth $30,468 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,936 for SEDG. Over the past 12 months, SEDG leads with a +125.8% total return vs TURB's -49.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSLR at 7.4% vs SEDG's -47.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTURB logoTURBTurbo Energy, S.A…ENPH logoENPHEnphase Energy, I…SEDG logoSEDGSolarEdge Technol…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+33.3%+8.0%+31.7%-2.8%-19.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-49.6%-25.7%+125.8%+83.4%+64.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-73.5%-77.7%-85.8%-55.2%+23.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-73.5%-69.1%-80.6%-70.0%+204.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-73.5%+1788.6%+82.8%-71.5%+334.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-35.7%-39.3%-47.9%-23.5%+7.4%
FSLR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TURB and SHLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TURB is the less volatile stock with a -1.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHLS's 2.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHLS currently trades 77.8% from its 52-week high vs TURB's 6.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTURB logoTURBTurbo Energy, S.A…ENPH logoENPHEnphase Energy, I…SEDG logoSEDGSolarEdge Technol…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-1.42x1.69x1.98x2.23x1.36x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$20.45$54.43$53.75$11.36$285.99
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.57$25.78$13.73$3.81$127.33
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+6.5%+67.0%+76.8%+77.8%+76.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10038.651.142.654.860.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded7.2M5.8M3.6M5.1M2.0M
Evenly matched — TURB and SHLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: ENPH as "Hold", SEDG as "Hold", SHLS as "Buy", FSLR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.4% upside for ENPH (target: $42) vs -16.5% for SEDG (target: $35).

MetricTURB logoTURBTurbo Energy, S.A…ENPH logoENPHEnphase Energy, I…SEDG logoSEDGSolarEdge Technol…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$42.41$34.50$8.75$251.82
# AnalystsCovering analysts55482373
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises03
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.7%0.0%+0.0%+0.1%
SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

FSLR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SHLS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallFirst Solar, Inc. (FSLR)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TURB vs ENPH vs SEDG vs SHLS vs FSLR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TURB or ENPH or SEDG or SHLS or FSLR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.

(SEDG) is the stronger pick with 31. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 1% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares (TURB). First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TURB or ENPH or SEDG or SHLS or FSLR?

On trailing P/E, First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. at 44. 2x. On forward P/E, First Solar, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First Solar, Inc. wins at 0. 40x versus Enphase Energy, Inc. 's 2. 86x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TURB or ENPH or SEDG or SHLS or FSLR?

Over the past 5 years, First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) delivered a total return of +204. 7%, compared to -80. 6% for SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. (SEDG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENPH returned +1789% versus TURB's -73. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TURB or ENPH or SEDG or SHLS or FSLR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Turbo Energy, S.

A. American Depositary Shares (TURB) is the lower-risk stock at -1. 42β versus Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. 's 2. 23β — meaning SHLS is approximately -257% more volatile than TURB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 2% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TURB or ENPH or SEDG or SHLS or FSLR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.

(SEDG) is pulling ahead at 31. 4% versus -28. 1% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares (TURB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 78. 2% year-over-year, compared to -50. 0% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, FSLR leads at 25. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TURB or ENPH or SEDG or SHLS or FSLR?

First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -35. 4% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSLR leads at 32. 3% versus -42. 2% for TURB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ENPH leads at 46. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TURB or ENPH or SEDG or SHLS or FSLR more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 40x versus Enphase Energy, Inc. 's 2. 86x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) trades at 12. 4x forward P/E versus 21. 5x for Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. — 9. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ENPH: 16. 4% to $42. 41.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TURB or ENPH or SEDG or SHLS or FSLR?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is TURB or ENPH or SEDG or SHLS or FSLR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Turbo Energy, S.

A. American Depositary Shares (TURB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1. 42)). Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) carries a higher beta of 2. 23 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TURB: -73. 5%, SHLS: -71. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TURB and ENPH and SEDG and SHLS and FSLR?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TURB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ENPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SEDG is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock; FSLR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TURB

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ENPH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SEDG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHLS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 37%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FSLR

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TURB and ENPH and SEDG and SHLS and FSLR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TURB: -63.2% · ENPH: -20.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.