Solar
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TURB vs SHLS vs SPWR vs ENPH vs FSLR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Solar
Solar
Solar
Solar
TURB vs SHLS vs SPWR vs ENPH vs FSLR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Solar | Solar | Solar | Solar | Solar |
| Market Cap | $3M | $1.32B | $866M | $4.67B | $23.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9M | $536M | $315M | $1.40B | $5.42B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $34M | $-42M | $135M | $1.67B |
| Gross Margin | 3.6% | 33.5% | 50.4% | 44.2% | 41.7% |
| Operating Margin | -42.2% | 11.2% | -2.7% | 6.8% | 33.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.4x | 5.1x | 17.6x | 12.0x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $175M | $188M | $1.24B | $499M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $7M | $10M | $474M | $2.80B |
TURB vs SHLS vs SPWR vs ENPH vs FSLR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turbo Energy, S.A. … (TURB) | 100 | 61.6 | -38.4% |
| Shoals Technologies… (SHLS) | 100 | 43.0 | -57.0% |
| SunPower Inc. (SPWR) | 100 | 49.5 | -50.5% |
| Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) | 100 | 29.5 | -70.5% |
| First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) | 100 | 132.8 | +32.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TURB vs SHLS vs SPWR vs ENPH vs FSLR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TURB plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
SHLS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.08
- +66.5% vs TURB's -43.3%
SPWR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, ENPH doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FSLR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 24.1%, EPS growth 18.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.8%
- 324.1% 10Y total return vs ENPH's 17.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 2.67x
- PEG 0.39 vs ENPH's 2.79
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.1% revenue growth vs TURB's -28.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.0x vs 17.6x), PEG 0.39 vs 2.79 | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.7% margin vs TURB's -35.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.39 vs SPWR's 2.13 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +66.5% vs TURB's -43.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.6% ROA vs TURB's -23.9%, ROIC 17.6% vs -42.0% |
TURB vs SHLS vs SPWR vs ENPH vs FSLR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TURB vs SHLS vs SPWR vs ENPH vs FSLR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FSLR leads in 4 of 6 categories
SHLS leads 1 • TURB leads 0 • SPWR leads 0 • ENPH leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FSLR is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.4B annually — 575.5x TURB's $9M. FSLR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TURB's -35.4%. On growth, SHLS holds the edge at +74.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9M | $536M | $315M | $1.4B | $5.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $73M | -$6M | $171M | $2.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $34M | -$42M | $135M | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$77M | -$15M | $145M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +33.5% | +50.4% | +44.2% | +41.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -42.2% | +11.2% | -2.7% | +6.8% | +33.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -35.4% | +6.3% | -13.2% | +9.6% | +30.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | -14.5% | -4.6% | +10.4% | +30.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -63.2% | +74.9% | -0.2% | -20.6% | +23.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.6% | — | -101.3% | -127.3% | +65.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FSLR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.1x trailing earnings, FSLR trades at a 61% valuation discount to SHLS's 39.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FSLR offers better value at 0.49x vs ENPH's 4.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $1.3B | $866M | $4.7B | $23.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $1.5B | $1.0B | $5.4B | $20.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.85x | 39.20x | -15.25x | 27.50x | 15.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.40x | 5.10x | 17.61x | 12.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.36x | 0.49x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 22.83x | — | 22.19x | 9.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.30x | 2.77x | 2.80x | 3.17x | 4.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.06x | 2.20x | — | 4.40x | 2.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 48.75x | 19.42x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-85 for TURB. FSLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TURB's 2.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FSLR scores 7/9 vs TURB's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -84.7% | +5.7% | — | +13.3% | +18.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.9% | +3.7% | -19.5% | +4.2% | +12.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -42.0% | +5.9% | -5.3% | +6.8% | +17.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -89.9% | +7.6% | -7.2% | +6.8% | +15.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.01x | 0.29x | — | 1.14x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | $168M | $179M | $769M | -$2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $7M | $10M | $474M | $2.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $175M | $188M | $1.2B | $499M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.39x | 5.91x | -1.57x | 47.60x | 53.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FSLR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FSLR five years ago would be worth $28,755 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,872 for SPWR. Over the past 12 months, SHLS leads with a +66.5% total return vs TURB's -43.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSLR at 6.5% vs SPWR's -42.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +49.3% | -13.8% | -38.2% | +5.1% | -21.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -43.3% | +66.5% | -42.4% | -18.9% | +65.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.3% | -60.2% | -81.3% | -78.3% | +20.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.3% | -72.8% | -81.3% | -71.2% | +187.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.3% | -74.7% | -81.3% | +1737.8% | +324.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -33.3% | -26.5% | -42.8% | -39.9% | +6.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TURB and FSLR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TURB is the less volatile stock with a -1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPWR's 2.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FSLR currently trades 75.0% from its 52-week high vs TURB's 7.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -1.26x | 2.08x | 2.13x | 1.70x | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.45 | $11.36 | $2.27 | $54.43 | $285.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.57 | $3.81 | $0.81 | $25.78 | $125.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +7.3% | +69.0% | +44.9% | +65.2% | +75.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.0 | 63.2 | 45.9 | 52.1 | 64.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.2M | 5.1M | 1.7M | 5.9M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SHLS as "Buy", SPWR as "Hold", ENPH as "Hold", FSLR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1450.0% upside for SPWR (target: $16) vs 22.6% for ENPH (target: $43).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $9.83 | $15.81 | $43.48 | $264.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 23 | 45 | 55 | 73 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% | +2.8% | +0.1% |
FSLR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SHLS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
TURB vs SHLS vs SPWR vs ENPH vs FSLR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TURB or SHLS or SPWR or ENPH or FSLR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the stronger pick with 24. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 1% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares (TURB). First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (12. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TURB or SHLS or SPWR or ENPH or FSLR?
On trailing P/E, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the cheapest at 15. 1x versus Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. at 39. 2x. On forward P/E, SunPower Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First Solar, Inc. wins at 0. 39x versus Enphase Energy, Inc. 's 2. 79x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TURB or SHLS or SPWR or ENPH or FSLR?
Over the past 5 years, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) delivered a total return of +187. 6%, compared to -81. 3% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENPH returned +1738% versus SPWR's -81. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TURB or SHLS or SPWR or ENPH or FSLR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Turbo Energy, S.
A. American Depositary Shares (TURB) is the lower-risk stock at -1. 26β versus SunPower Inc. 's 2. 13β — meaning SPWR is approximately -269% more volatile than TURB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 2% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TURB or SHLS or SPWR or ENPH or FSLR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is pulling ahead at 24. 1% versus -28. 1% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares (TURB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Enphase Energy, Inc. grew EPS 72. 0% year-over-year, compared to -50. 0% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPWR leads at 65. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TURB or SHLS or SPWR or ENPH or FSLR?
First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -35. 4% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSLR leads at 32. 3% versus -42. 2% for TURB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPWR leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TURB or SHLS or SPWR or ENPH or FSLR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 39x versus Enphase Energy, Inc. 's 2. 79x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SunPower Inc. (SPWR) trades at 5. 1x forward P/E versus 19. 4x for Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPWR: 1450. 0% to $15. 81.
08Which pays a better dividend — TURB or SHLS or SPWR or ENPH or FSLR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TURB or SHLS or SPWR or ENPH or FSLR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Turbo Energy, S.
A. American Depositary Shares (TURB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1. 26)). SunPower Inc. (SPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TURB: -70. 3%, SPWR: -81. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TURB and SHLS and SPWR and ENPH and FSLR?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TURB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ENPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FSLR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.