Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TWIN vs CAT vs DE vs AGCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
TWIN vs CAT vs DE vs AGCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $266M | $416.75B | $157.32B | $8.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $348M | $70.75B | $45.88B | $10.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $22M | $9.42B | $4.08B | $771M |
| Gross Margin | 27.9% | 32.5% | 34.7% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | 3.3% | 16.6% | 17.0% | 6.9% |
| Forward P/E | 25.2x | 38.8x | 32.5x | 20.4x |
| Total Debt | $49M | $43.33B | $63.94B | $2.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $9.98B | $8.28B | $862M |
TWIN vs CAT vs DE vs AGCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Twin Disc, Incorpor… (TWIN) | 100 | 335.3 | +235.3% |
| Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) | 100 | 745.6 | +645.6% |
| Deere & Company (DE) | 100 | 381.5 | +281.5% |
| AGCO Corporation (AGCO) | 100 | 213.2 | +113.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TWIN vs CAT vs DE vs AGCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TWIN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 15.5%, EPS growth -117.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 29.9%, current ratio 1.96x
- 15.5% revenue growth vs AGCO's -13.5%
CAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 12.3% 10Y total return vs DE's 6.7%
- PEG 1.38 vs DE's 1.99
- 13.3% margin vs TWIN's 6.3%
- +181.5% vs DE's +24.2%
DE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 1.1%
- Beta 0.56, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.31x
- Beta 0.56 vs CAT's 1.54
- 1.1% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs TWIN's 0.9%
AGCO is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (20.4x vs 32.5x), PEG 1.77 vs 1.99
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.5% revenue growth vs AGCO's -13.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.4x vs 32.5x), PEG 1.77 vs 1.99 | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.3% margin vs TWIN's 6.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs CAT's 1.54 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs TWIN's 0.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +181.5% vs DE's +24.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs DE's 3.9%, ROIC 15.9% vs 7.7% |
TWIN vs CAT vs DE vs AGCO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TWIN vs CAT vs DE vs AGCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CAT leads in 3 of 6 categories
AGCO leads 1 • DE leads 1 • TWIN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $70.8B annually — 203.3x TWIN's $348M. CAT is the more profitable business, keeping 13.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TWIN's 6.3%. On growth, CAT holds the edge at +22.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $348M | $70.8B | $45.9B | $10.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $27M | $14.0B | $9.5B | $963M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $22M | $9.4B | $4.1B | $771M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$70,000 | $11.4B | $5.5B | $546M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.9% | +32.5% | +34.7% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +16.6% | +17.0% | +6.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | +13.3% | +8.9% | +7.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | +16.2% | +12.0% | +5.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.3% | +22.2% | +16.3% | +14.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.7% | +30.2% | -24.1% | +4.4% |
Valuation Metrics
AGCO leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, AGCO trades at a 75% valuation discount to CAT's 47.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AGCO offers better value at 1.05x vs DE's 1.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $266M | $416.8B | $157.3B | $8.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $299M | $450.1B | $213.0B | $10.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -131.50x | 47.57x | 31.37x | 12.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.22x | 38.79x | 32.53x | 20.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.69x | 1.92x | 1.05x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.05x | 33.41x | 20.01x | 10.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.78x | 6.17x | 3.52x | 0.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.55x | 19.71x | 6.06x | 1.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.10x | 40.56x | 48.69x | 11.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT delivers a 47.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $13 for TWIN. TWIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DE's 2.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGCO scores 8/9 vs DE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.2% | +47.5% | +15.5% | +16.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.1% | +10.0% | +3.9% | +6.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.9% | +15.9% | +7.7% | +8.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.5% | +19.1% | +11.4% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 2.03x | 2.46x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $33M | $33.4B | $55.7B | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $10.0B | $8.3B | $862M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $49M | $43.3B | $63.9B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.82x | 9.22x | 2.74x | 10.36x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAT five years ago would be worth $38,251 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,036 for AGCO. Over the past 12 months, CAT leads with a +181.5% total return vs DE's +24.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAT at 62.0% vs AGCO's 0.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.9% | +50.2% | +24.7% | +11.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +156.5% | +181.5% | +24.2% | +25.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.3% | +324.9% | +57.4% | +1.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.5% | +282.5% | +54.1% | -9.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +87.2% | +1227.6% | +671.0% | +178.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.8% | +62.0% | +16.3% | +0.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CAT and DE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DE is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAT's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs AGCO's 81.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 1.54x | 0.56x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.63 | $931.35 | $674.19 | $143.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.80 | $318.11 | $433.00 | $93.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.8% | +96.2% | +86.1% | +81.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.3 | 76.2 | 54.0 | 52.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 49K | 2.4M | 1.2M | 696K |
Analyst Outlook
DE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TWIN as "Hold", CAT as "Buy", DE as "Hold", AGCO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 17.3% upside for DE (target: $681) vs -7.9% for CAT (target: $825). For income investors, DE offers the higher dividend yield at 1.09% vs CAT's 0.65%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $824.80 | $680.54 | $127.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 53 | 46 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +0.7% | +1.1% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.16 | $5.86 | $6.33 | $1.16 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +1.2% | +0.7% | +2.9% |
CAT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AGCO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
TWIN vs CAT vs DE vs AGCO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TWIN or CAT or DE or AGCO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) is the stronger pick with 15.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 5% for AGCO Corporation (AGCO). AGCO Corporation (AGCO) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (20. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TWIN or CAT or DE or AGCO?
On trailing P/E, AGCO Corporation (AGCO) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 47. 6x. On forward P/E, AGCO Corporation is actually cheaper at 20. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Caterpillar Inc. wins at 1. 38x versus Deere & Company's 1. 99x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TWIN or CAT or DE or AGCO?
Over the past 5 years, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) delivered a total return of +282. 5%, compared to -9. 6% for AGCO Corporation (AGCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAT returned +1228% versus TWIN's +87. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TWIN or CAT or DE or AGCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Deere & Company (DE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
56β versus Caterpillar Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning CAT is approximately 173% more volatile than DE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 2% for Deere & Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TWIN or CAT or DE or AGCO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) is pulling ahead at 15.
5% versus -13. 5% for AGCO Corporation (AGCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AGCO Corporation grew EPS 271. 4% year-over-year, compared to -117. 7% for Twin Disc, Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, TWIN leads at 11. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TWIN or CAT or DE or AGCO?
Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 1% net margin versus -0. 6% for Twin Disc, Incorporated — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DE leads at 18. 8% versus 2. 9% for TWIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DE leads at 36. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TWIN or CAT or DE or AGCO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 38x versus Deere & Company's 1. 99x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, AGCO Corporation (AGCO) trades at 20. 4x forward P/E versus 38. 8x for Caterpillar Inc. — 18. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DE: 17. 3% to $680. 54.
08Which pays a better dividend — TWIN or CAT or DE or AGCO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Deere & Company (DE) offers the highest yield at 1. 1%, versus 0. 7% for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT).
09Is TWIN or CAT or DE or AGCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Deere & Company (DE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
56), 1. 1% yield, +671. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DE: +671. 0%, TWIN: +87. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TWIN and CAT and DE and AGCO?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TWIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; CAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; DE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AGCO is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.