Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TWIN vs NN vs TRMB vs AIXI vs NOVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Software - Application
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
TWIN vs NN vs TRMB vs AIXI vs NOVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Internet Content & Information | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Software - Application | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $266M | $2.64B | $14.65B | $8M | $4.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $348M | $5M | $3.69B | $115M | $981M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $22M | $-189M | $456M | $-53M | $54M |
| Gross Margin | 27.9% | -256.2% | 68.8% | 64.3% | 44.4% |
| Operating Margin | 3.3% | -15.4% | 17.7% | -44.2% | 11.9% |
| Forward P/E | 25.2x | — | 20.0x | — | 38.2x |
| Total Debt | $49M | $15M | $1.39B | $46M | $342M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $45M | $253M | $847K | $381M |
TWIN vs NN vs TRMB vs AIXI vs NOVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Twin Disc, Incorpor… (TWIN) | 100 | 193.2 | +93.2% |
| NextNav Inc. (NN) | 100 | 961.1 | +861.1% |
| Trimble Inc. (TRMB) | 100 | 118.0 | +18.0% |
| Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) | 100 | 1.2 | -98.8% |
| Novanta Inc. (NOVT) | 100 | 85.7 | -14.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TWIN vs NN vs TRMB vs AIXI vs NOVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TWIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 29.9%, current ratio 1.96x
- 0.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +156.5% vs AIXI's -79.2%
- 6.1% ROA vs NN's -73.1%
NN is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.33, current ratio 12.71x
TRMB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 8.15 vs NOVT's 11.61
- Lower P/E (20.0x vs 38.2x), PEG 8.15 vs 11.61
- 12.4% margin vs NN's -41.4%
AIXI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.94
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 52.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
- 18.8% revenue growth vs NN's -19.3%
- Beta 0.94 vs NOVT's 2.02
NOVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 8.5% 10Y total return vs NN's 100.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% revenue growth vs NN's -19.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.0x vs 38.2x), PEG 8.15 vs 11.61 | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.4% margin vs NN's -41.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs NOVT's 2.02 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +156.5% vs AIXI's -79.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs NN's -73.1% |
TWIN vs NN vs TRMB vs AIXI vs NOVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TWIN vs NN vs TRMB vs AIXI vs NOVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRMB leads in 1 of 6 categories
TWIN leads 1 • NOVT leads 1 • NN leads 1 • AIXI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.7B annually — 806.2x NN's $5M. TRMB is the more profitable business, keeping 12.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NN's -41.4%. On growth, TRMB holds the edge at +11.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $348M | $5M | $3.7B | $115M | $981M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $27M | -$62M | $785M | -$49M | $179M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $22M | -$189M | $456M | -$53M | $54M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$70,000 | -$51M | $253M | -$2M | $48M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.9% | -2.6% | +68.8% | +64.3% | +44.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | -15.4% | +17.7% | -44.2% | +11.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | -41.4% | +12.4% | -45.9% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | -11.2% | +6.9% | -2.0% | +4.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.3% | -50.5% | +11.8% | -64.9% | +8.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.7% | -85.2% | +55.6% | -29.9% | -2.2% |
Valuation Metrics
TWIN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 35.3x trailing earnings, TRMB trades at a 62% valuation discount to NOVT's 92.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMB offers better value at 14.39x vs NOVT's 28.13x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $266M | $2.6B | $14.7B | $8M | $4.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $299M | $2.6B | $15.8B | $53M | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -131.50x | -13.74x | 35.34x | -0.45x | 92.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.22x | — | 20.01x | — | 38.25x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 14.39x | — | 28.13x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.05x | — | 20.05x | — | 27.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.78x | 577.54x | 4.08x | 0.11x | 4.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.55x | — | 2.54x | — | 3.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.10x | — | 110.00x | — | 100.38x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NOVT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TWIN delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $4 for NOVT. TRMB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TWIN's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TWIN scores 5/9 vs NN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.2% | — | +8.0% | — | +4.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.1% | -73.1% | +5.0% | -65.3% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.9% | — | +6.8% | -34.4% | +7.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.5% | -36.6% | +7.8% | -3.4% | +8.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | — | 0.24x | — | 0.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $33M | -$30M | $1.1B | $45M | -$39M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $45M | $253M | $846,593 | $381M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $49M | $15M | $1.4B | $46M | $342M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.82x | -5.64x | 12.26x | -14.13x | 4.89x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NN five years ago would be worth $19,608 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $138 for AIXI. Over the past 12 months, TWIN leads with a +156.5% total return vs AIXI's -79.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NN at 109.2% vs AIXI's -75.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.9% | +20.3% | -21.0% | +68.1% | +22.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +156.5% | +41.4% | -6.7% | -79.2% | +14.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.3% | +816.0% | +30.1% | -98.6% | -15.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.5% | +96.1% | -22.0% | -98.6% | +5.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +87.2% | +100.1% | +166.8% | -98.6% | +853.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.8% | +109.2% | +9.2% | -75.9% | -5.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TWIN and AIXI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AIXI is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NOVT's 2.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TWIN currently trades 93.8% from its 52-week high vs AIXI's 18.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 1.33x | 1.46x | 0.94x | 2.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.63 | $24.19 | $87.50 | $4.02 | $149.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.80 | $10.84 | $61.63 | $0.08 | $98.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.8% | +80.7% | +70.7% | +18.0% | +90.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.3 | 55.2 | 36.8 | 49.3 | 62.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 49K | 2.2M | 1.7M | 60.6M | 375K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TWIN as "Hold", NN as "Buy", TRMB as "Buy", NOVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 53.6% upside for TRMB (target: $95) vs 10.1% for NOVT (target: $150). TWIN is the only dividend payer here at 0.90% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $26.33 | $95.00 | — | $150.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 3 | 28 | — | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.16 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | 0.0% | +5.9% | 0.0% | +0.8% |
TRMB leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). TWIN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
TWIN vs NN vs TRMB vs AIXI vs NOVT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TWIN or NN or TRMB or AIXI or NOVT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is the stronger pick with 18.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for NextNav Inc. (NN). Trimble Inc. (TRMB) offers the better valuation at 35. 3x trailing P/E (20. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NextNav Inc. (NN) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TWIN or NN or TRMB or AIXI or NOVT?
On trailing P/E, Trimble Inc.
(TRMB) is the cheapest at 35. 3x versus Novanta Inc. at 92. 7x. On forward P/E, Trimble Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Trimble Inc. wins at 8. 15x versus Novanta Inc. 's 11. 61x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TWIN or NN or TRMB or AIXI or NOVT?
Over the past 5 years, NextNav Inc.
(NN) delivered a total return of +96. 1%, compared to -98. 6% for Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NOVT returned +853. 7% versus AIXI's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TWIN or NN or TRMB or AIXI or NOVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
94β versus Novanta Inc. 's 2. 02β — meaning NOVT is approximately 114% more volatile than AIXI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trimble Inc. (TRMB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 30% for Twin Disc, Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TWIN or NN or TRMB or AIXI or NOVT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is pulling ahead at 18.
8% versus -19. 3% for NextNav Inc. (NN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xiao-I Corporation grew EPS 52. 7% year-over-year, compared to -117. 7% for Twin Disc, Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIXI leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TWIN or NN or TRMB or AIXI or NOVT?
Trimble Inc.
(TRMB) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 8% net margin versus -41. 4% for NextNav Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMB leads at 16. 9% versus -1535. 8% for NN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AIXI leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TWIN or NN or TRMB or AIXI or NOVT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Trimble Inc. (TRMB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 8. 15x versus Novanta Inc. 's 11. 61x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Trimble Inc. (TRMB) trades at 20. 0x forward P/E versus 38. 2x for Novanta Inc. — 18. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRMB: 53. 6% to $95. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TWIN or NN or TRMB or AIXI or NOVT?
In this comparison, TWIN (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. NN, TRMB, AIXI, NOVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TWIN or NN or TRMB or AIXI or NOVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
04), 0. 9% yield). Novanta Inc. (NOVT) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TWIN: +87. 2%, NOVT: +853. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TWIN and NN and TRMB and AIXI and NOVT?
These companies operate in different sectors (TWIN (Industrials) and NN (Communication Services) and TRMB (Technology) and AIXI (Technology) and NOVT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TWIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; NN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRMB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock; NOVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. TWIN pays a dividend while NN, TRMB, AIXI, NOVT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.