Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TZOO vs EXPE vs TRIP vs ABNB vs TCOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Services
Travel Services
Travel Services
Travel Services
TZOO vs EXPE vs TRIP vs ABNB vs TCOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Travel Services | Travel Services | Travel Services | Travel Services |
| Market Cap | $102M | $29.58B | $1.31B | $84.21B | $34.87B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $93M | $15.17B | $1.88B | $12.65B | $59.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $1.56B | $19M | $2.52B | $31.17B |
| Gross Margin | 79.4% | 88.8% | 66.2% | 82.9% | 80.7% |
| Operating Margin | 7.1% | 14.7% | 3.7% | 20.5% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | 13.4x | 13.0x | 7.7x | 28.3x | 1.9x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $6.67B | $1.24B | $2.07B | $40.32B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $6.98B | $1.03B | $6.56B | $48.44B |
TZOO vs EXPE vs TRIP vs ABNB vs TCOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Travelzoo (TZOO) | 100 | 98.9 | -1.1% |
| Expedia Group, Inc. (EXPE) | 100 | 190.9 | +90.9% |
| Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP) | 100 | 39.0 | -61.0% |
| Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) | 100 | 95.7 | -4.3% |
| Trip.com Group Limi… (TCOM) | 100 | 158.2 | +58.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TZOO vs EXPE vs TRIP vs ABNB vs TCOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TZOO plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
EXPE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 130.6% 10Y total return vs TCOM's 24.0%
- 0.6% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +52.8% vs TZOO's -30.2%
TRIP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, ABNB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TCOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.97
- Rev growth 19.7%, EPS growth 67.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 28.1%, current ratio 1.51x
- Beta 0.97, current ratio 1.51x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.7% revenue growth vs TRIP's 3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.9x vs 28.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 52.2% margin vs TRIP's 1.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.97 vs TRIP's 1.90, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.8% vs TZOO's -30.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs TRIP's 0.7%, ROIC 8.1% vs 7.4% |
TZOO vs EXPE vs TRIP vs ABNB vs TCOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TZOO vs EXPE vs TRIP vs ABNB vs TCOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TCOM leads in 3 of 6 categories
EXPE leads 1 • TZOO leads 0 • TRIP leads 0 • ABNB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TCOM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TCOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $59.8B annually — 643.6x TZOO's $93M. TCOM is the more profitable business, keeping 52.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TRIP's 1.0%. On growth, ABNB holds the edge at +17.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $93M | $15.2B | $1.9B | $12.6B | $59.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $3.1B | $166M | $2.6B | $16.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $1.6B | $19M | $2.5B | $31.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6M | $4.9B | $198M | $4.5B | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.4% | +88.8% | +66.2% | +82.9% | +80.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +14.7% | +3.7% | +20.5% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +10.3% | +1.0% | +19.9% | +52.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +32.1% | +10.5% | +36.0% | +35.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.9% | +14.7% | -3.9% | +17.9% | +15.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.5% | +96.8% | -2.6% | +4.0% | +188.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TRIP and TCOM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, TCOM trades at a 60% valuation discount to TRIP's 36.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TRIP's 8.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ABNB's 31.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $102M | $29.6B | $1.3B | $84.2B | $34.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $102M | $29.3B | $1.5B | $79.7B | $33.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.78x | 25.77x | 36.23x | 34.85x | 14.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.42x | 13.02x | 7.66x | 28.35x | 1.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.82x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.19x | 10.22x | 8.77x | 31.33x | 15.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.11x | 2.01x | 0.69x | 6.88x | 4.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 13.10x | 2.28x | 10.67x | 1.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.25x | 9.51x | 8.02x | 18.12x | 12.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TZOO delivers a 4.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $3 for TRIP. ABNB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXPE's 2.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TCOM scores 7/9 vs TZOO's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.9% | +68.7% | +2.9% | +31.2% | +18.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.5% | +6.0% | +0.7% | +10.2% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +40.2% | +7.4% | +50.6% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +47.2% | +23.9% | +4.5% | +26.3% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.62x | 1.92x | 0.25x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $172,000 | -$307M | $202M | -$4.5B | -$8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $7.0B | $1.0B | $6.6B | $48.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $6.7B | $1.2B | $2.1B | $40.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 16.35x | 4.17x | — | 31.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EXPE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EXPE five years ago would be worth $14,693 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,542 for TRIP. Over the past 12 months, EXPE leads with a +52.8% total return vs TZOO's -30.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EXPE at 40.2% vs TRIP's -11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.8% | -10.5% | -23.3% | +5.6% | -28.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.2% | +52.8% | -21.8% | +14.1% | -14.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.1% | +175.6% | -30.5% | +11.8% | +61.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.5% | +46.9% | -74.6% | -7.1% | +36.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.8% | +130.6% | -76.7% | -2.9% | +24.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.9% | +40.2% | -11.4% | +3.8% | +17.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ABNB and TCOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TCOM is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRIP's 1.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ABNB currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs TRIP's 55.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.30x | 1.47x | 1.90x | 1.33x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.48 | $303.80 | $20.16 | $147.25 | $78.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.71 | $148.55 | $9.01 | $110.81 | $48.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.3% | +83.2% | +55.7% | +95.4% | +67.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.5 | 50.2 | 52.5 | 56.2 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 257K | 1.9M | 3.4M | 3.5M | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
TCOM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TZOO as "Buy", EXPE as "Hold", TRIP as "Hold", ABNB as "Hold", TCOM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 40.5% upside for TCOM (target: $75) vs 3.5% for ABNB (target: $145). EXPE is the only dividend payer here at 0.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $272.35 | $13.56 | $145.44 | $75.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 75 | 56 | 44 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.6% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 1 | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.52 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +12.8% | +6.5% | +39.9% | +4.5% | +0.9% |
TCOM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EXPE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
TZOO vs EXPE vs TRIP vs ABNB vs TCOM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TZOO or EXPE or TRIP or ABNB or TCOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trip.
com Group Limited (TCOM) is the stronger pick with 19. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 1% for Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP). Trip. com Group Limited (TCOM) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (1. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Travelzoo (TZOO) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TZOO or EXPE or TRIP or ABNB or TCOM?
On trailing P/E, Trip.
com Group Limited (TCOM) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus Tripadvisor, Inc. at 36. 2x. On forward P/E, Trip. com Group Limited is actually cheaper at 1. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TZOO or EXPE or TRIP or ABNB or TCOM?
Over the past 5 years, Expedia Group, Inc.
(EXPE) delivered a total return of +46. 9%, compared to -74. 6% for Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXPE returned +130. 6% versus TRIP's -76. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TZOO or EXPE or TRIP or ABNB or TCOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Trip.
com Group Limited (TCOM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus Tripadvisor, Inc. 's 1. 90β — meaning TRIP is approximately 96% more volatile than TCOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 3% for Expedia Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TZOO or EXPE or TRIP or ABNB or TCOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trip.
com Group Limited (TCOM) is pulling ahead at 19. 7% versus 3. 1% for Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tripadvisor, Inc. grew EPS 798. 6% year-over-year, compared to -61. 3% for Travelzoo. Over a 3-year CAGR, TCOM leads at 38. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TZOO or EXPE or TRIP or ABNB or TCOM?
Trip.
com Group Limited (TCOM) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 0% net margin versus 2. 1% for Tripadvisor, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TCOM leads at 26. 6% versus 4. 2% for TRIP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXPE leads at 84. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TZOO or EXPE or TRIP or ABNB or TCOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Trip.
com Group Limited (TCOM) trades at 1. 9x forward P/E versus 28. 3x for Airbnb, Inc. — 26. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TCOM: 40. 5% to $75. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TZOO or EXPE or TRIP or ABNB or TCOM?
In this comparison, EXPE (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. TZOO, TRIP, ABNB, TCOM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TZOO or EXPE or TRIP or ABNB or TCOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Expedia Group, Inc.
(EXPE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 6% yield, +130. 6% 10Y return). Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP) carries a higher beta of 1. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXPE: +130. 6%, TRIP: -76. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TZOO and EXPE and TRIP and ABNB and TCOM?
These companies operate in different sectors (TZOO (Communication Services) and EXPE (Consumer Cyclical) and TRIP (Consumer Cyclical) and ABNB (Consumer Cyclical) and TCOM (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TZOO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EXPE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TRIP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABNB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TCOM is a mid-cap high-growth stock. EXPE pays a dividend while TZOO, TRIP, ABNB, TCOM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.