Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TZOO vs TRIP vs MMYT vs EXPE vs ABNB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Services
Travel Services
Travel Services
Travel Services
TZOO vs TRIP vs MMYT vs EXPE vs ABNB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Travel Services | Travel Services | Travel Services | Travel Services |
| Market Cap | $102M | $1.31B | $4.52B | $29.58B | $84.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $93M | $1.88B | $1.04B | $15.17B | $12.65B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $19M | $57M | $1.56B | $2.52B |
| Gross Margin | 79.4% | 66.2% | 73.4% | 88.8% | 82.9% |
| Operating Margin | 7.1% | 3.7% | 14.1% | 14.7% | 20.5% |
| Forward P/E | 13.4x | 7.7x | 73.2x | 13.0x | 28.3x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $1.24B | $237M | $6.67B | $2.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $1.03B | $509M | $6.98B | $6.56B |
TZOO vs TRIP vs MMYT vs EXPE vs ABNB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Travelzoo (TZOO) | 100 | 98.9 | -1.1% |
| Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP) | 100 | 39.0 | -61.0% |
| MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) | 100 | 171.0 | +71.0% |
| Expedia Group, Inc. (EXPE) | 100 | 190.9 | +90.9% |
| Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) | 100 | 95.7 | -4.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TZOO vs TRIP vs MMYT vs EXPE vs ABNB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, TZOO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TRIP is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (7.7x vs 28.3x)
MMYT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 25.0%, EPS growth -54.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 47.7%
- 190.1% 10Y total return vs EXPE's 130.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.17, Low D/E 19.6%, current ratio 1.85x
- Beta 1.17, current ratio 1.85x
EXPE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.47, yield 0.6%
- 0.6% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +52.8% vs MMYT's -54.9%
ABNB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.
- 19.9% margin vs TRIP's 1.0%
- 10.2% ROA vs TRIP's 0.7%, ROIC 50.6% vs 7.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.0% revenue growth vs TRIP's 3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.7x vs 28.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.9% margin vs TRIP's 1.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.17 vs TRIP's 1.90, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.8% vs MMYT's -54.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.2% ROA vs TRIP's 0.7%, ROIC 50.6% vs 7.4% |
TZOO vs TRIP vs MMYT vs EXPE vs ABNB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TZOO vs TRIP vs MMYT vs EXPE vs ABNB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABNB leads in 2 of 6 categories
EXPE leads 2 • TRIP leads 1 • TZOO leads 0 • MMYT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABNB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXPE is the larger business by revenue, generating $15.2B annually — 163.4x TZOO's $93M. ABNB is the more profitable business, keeping 19.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TRIP's 1.0%. On growth, ABNB holds the edge at +17.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $93M | $1.9B | $1.0B | $15.2B | $12.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | $166M | $175M | $3.1B | $2.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $19M | $57M | $1.6B | $2.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6M | $198M | $224M | $4.9B | $4.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.4% | +66.2% | +73.4% | +88.8% | +82.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +3.7% | +14.1% | +14.7% | +20.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +1.0% | +5.5% | +10.3% | +19.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +10.5% | +21.5% | +32.1% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.9% | -3.9% | +10.6% | +14.7% | +17.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.5% | -2.6% | -68.3% | +96.8% | +4.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TRIP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.8x trailing earnings, TZOO trades at a 63% valuation discount to MMYT's 60.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TRIP's 8.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ABNB's 31.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $102M | $1.3B | $4.5B | $29.6B | $84.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $102M | $1.5B | $4.3B | $29.3B | $79.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.78x | 36.23x | 60.86x | 25.77x | 34.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.42x | 7.66x | 73.17x | 13.02x | 28.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.19x | 8.77x | 28.92x | 10.22x | 31.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.11x | 0.69x | 4.62x | 2.01x | 6.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.28x | 4.79x | 13.10x | 10.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.25x | 8.02x | 26.07x | 9.51x | 18.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ABNB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TZOO delivers a 4.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $3 for TRIP. MMYT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXPE's 2.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRIP scores 6/9 vs TZOO's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.9% | +2.9% | +8.2% | +68.7% | +31.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.5% | +0.7% | +3.1% | +6.0% | +10.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +7.4% | +9.2% | +40.2% | +50.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +47.2% | +4.5% | +9.2% | +23.9% | +26.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.92x | 0.20x | 2.62x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $172,000 | $202M | -$272M | -$307M | -$4.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $1.0B | $509M | $7.0B | $6.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $1.2B | $237M | $6.7B | $2.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 4.17x | 1.67x | 16.35x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EXPE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MMYT five years ago would be worth $19,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,542 for TRIP. Over the past 12 months, EXPE leads with a +52.8% total return vs MMYT's -54.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EXPE at 40.2% vs TRIP's -11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.8% | -23.3% | -38.3% | -10.5% | +5.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.2% | -21.8% | -54.9% | +52.8% | +14.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.1% | -30.5% | +97.5% | +175.6% | +11.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.5% | -74.6% | +97.0% | +46.9% | -7.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.8% | -76.7% | +190.1% | +130.6% | -2.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.9% | -11.4% | +25.5% | +40.2% | +3.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MMYT and ABNB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MMYT is the less volatile stock with a 1.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRIP's 1.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ABNB currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs MMYT's 44.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.30x | 1.90x | 1.17x | 1.47x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.48 | $20.16 | $113.85 | $303.80 | $147.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.71 | $9.01 | $32.84 | $148.55 | $110.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.3% | +55.7% | +44.4% | +83.2% | +95.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.5 | 52.5 | 59.4 | 50.2 | 56.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 257K | 3.4M | 1.5M | 1.9M | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
EXPE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TZOO as "Buy", TRIP as "Hold", MMYT as "Buy", EXPE as "Hold", ABNB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 80.2% upside for MMYT (target: $91) vs 3.5% for ABNB (target: $145). EXPE is the only dividend payer here at 0.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $13.56 | $91.00 | $272.35 | $145.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 56 | 11 | 75 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.52 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +12.8% | +39.9% | +0.5% | +6.5% | +4.5% |
ABNB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EXPE leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
TZOO vs TRIP vs MMYT vs EXPE vs ABNB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TZOO or TRIP or MMYT or EXPE or ABNB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is the stronger pick with 25.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 1% for Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP). Travelzoo (TZOO) offers the better valuation at 22. 8x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Travelzoo (TZOO) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TZOO or TRIP or MMYT or EXPE or ABNB?
On trailing P/E, Travelzoo (TZOO) is the cheapest at 22.
8x versus MakeMyTrip Limited at 60. 9x. On forward P/E, Tripadvisor, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TZOO or TRIP or MMYT or EXPE or ABNB?
Over the past 5 years, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) delivered a total return of +97.
0%, compared to -74. 6% for Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MMYT returned +190. 1% versus TRIP's -76. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TZOO or TRIP or MMYT or EXPE or ABNB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
17β versus Tripadvisor, Inc. 's 1. 90β — meaning TRIP is approximately 62% more volatile than MMYT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 3% for Expedia Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TZOO or TRIP or MMYT or EXPE or ABNB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is pulling ahead at 25.
0% versus 3. 1% for Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tripadvisor, Inc. grew EPS 798. 6% year-over-year, compared to -61. 3% for Travelzoo. Over a 3-year CAGR, MMYT leads at 47. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TZOO or TRIP or MMYT or EXPE or ABNB?
Airbnb, Inc.
(ABNB) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 5% net margin versus 2. 1% for Tripadvisor, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABNB leads at 20. 8% versus 4. 2% for TRIP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXPE leads at 84. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TZOO or TRIP or MMYT or EXPE or ABNB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Tripadvisor, Inc.
(TRIP) trades at 7. 7x forward P/E versus 73. 2x for MakeMyTrip Limited — 65. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MMYT: 80. 2% to $91. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TZOO or TRIP or MMYT or EXPE or ABNB?
In this comparison, EXPE (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. TZOO, TRIP, MMYT, ABNB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TZOO or TRIP or MMYT or EXPE or ABNB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Expedia Group, Inc.
(EXPE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 6% yield, +130. 6% 10Y return). Tripadvisor, Inc. (TRIP) carries a higher beta of 1. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXPE: +130. 6%, TRIP: -76. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TZOO and TRIP and MMYT and EXPE and ABNB?
These companies operate in different sectors (TZOO (Communication Services) and TRIP (Consumer Cyclical) and MMYT (Consumer Cyclical) and EXPE (Consumer Cyclical) and ABNB (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TZOO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRIP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MMYT is a small-cap high-growth stock; EXPE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ABNB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. EXPE pays a dividend while TZOO, TRIP, MMYT, ABNB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.