Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

UAMY vs HL vs USAS vs CDE vs EXK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
UAMY
United States Antimony Corporation

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.54B
5Y Perf.+3092.6%
HL
Hecla Mining Company

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.13B
5Y Perf.+460.5%
USAS
Americas Gold and Silver Corporation

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsAMEX • CA
Market Cap$2.03B
5Y Perf.+33.4%
CDE
Coeur Mining, Inc.

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$11.63B
5Y Perf.+222.8%
EXK
Endeavour Silver Corp.

Other Precious Metals

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$2.99B
5Y Perf.+422.7%

UAMY vs HL vs USAS vs CDE vs EXK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
UAMY logoUAMY
HL logoHL
USAS logoUSAS
CDE logoCDE
EXK logoEXK
IndustryIndustrial MaterialsGoldIndustrial MaterialsGoldOther Precious Metals
Market Cap$1.54B$12.13B$2.03B$11.63B$2.99B
Revenue (TTM)$39M$1.57B$109M$2.57B$330M
Net Income (TTM)$-4M$559M$-61M$799M$-94M
Gross Margin25.2%50.9%3.3%35.4%9.3%
Operating Margin-21.5%44.1%-25.5%39.4%-1.7%
Forward P/E193.8x19.1x27.7x9.1x14.3x
Total Debt$185K$299M$24M$365M$120M
Cash & Equiv.$30M$242M$20M$554M$106M

UAMY vs HL vs USAS vs CDE vs EXKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

UAMY
HL
USAS
CDE
EXK
StockMay 20May 26Return
United States Antim… (UAMY)1003192.6+3092.6%
Hecla Mining Company (HL)100560.5+460.5%
Americas Gold and S… (USAS)100133.4+33.4%
Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE)100322.8+222.8%
Endeavour Silver Co… (EXK)100522.7+422.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: UAMY vs HL vs USAS vs CDE vs EXK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HL leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. United States Antimony Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. USAS and CDE also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
UAMY
United States Antimony Corporation
The Growth Play

UAMY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 162.8%, EPS growth -150.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 52.6%
  • 37.0% 10Y total return vs HL's 360.6%
  • 162.8% revenue growth vs USAS's 5.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
HL
Hecla Mining Company
The Income Pick

HL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.26, yield 0.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 11.5%, current ratio 2.72x
  • Beta 1.26, yield 0.1%, current ratio 2.72x
  • 35.6% margin vs USAS's -56.2%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
USAS
Americas Gold and Silver Corporation
The Momentum Pick

USAS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +418.7% vs UAMY's +190.8%
Best for: momentum
CDE
Coeur Mining, Inc.
The Value Play

CDE is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (9.1x vs 14.3x)
Best for: value
EXK
Endeavour Silver Corp.
The Value Angle

Among these 5 stocks, EXK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: basic materials exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthUAMY logoUAMY162.8% revenue growth vs USAS's 5.3%
ValueCDE logoCDELower P/E (9.1x vs 14.3x)
Quality / MarginsHL logoHL35.6% margin vs USAS's -56.2%
Stability / SafetyHL logoHLBeta 1.26 vs USAS's 2.31, lower leverage
DividendsHL logoHL0.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)USAS logoUSAS+418.7% vs UAMY's +190.8%
Efficiency (ROA)HL logoHL16.3% ROA vs USAS's -26.1%, ROIC 15.3% vs -26.3%

UAMY vs HL vs USAS vs CDE vs EXK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

UAMYUnited States Antimony Corporation
FY 2025
Antimony
90.1%$35M
Zeolite
8.6%$3M
Precious Metals
1.3%$519,902
HLHecla Mining Company
FY 2024
Silver Contracts
43.5%$414M
Gold
33.5%$318M
Zinc
13.8%$131M
Lead
9.2%$87M
Copper
0.0%$416,000
USASAmericas Gold and Silver Corporation
FY 2023
Silver
49.0%$62M
Zinc
30.2%$38M
Lead
20.0%$25M
Other by-products
0.8%$1M
CDECoeur Mining, Inc.
FY 2025
Gold
64.9%$1.3B
Product, Silver
35.1%$726M
EXKEndeavour Silver Corp.
FY 2024
Concentrate Sales
101.1%$71M
Provisional Pricing Adjustments
-1.1%$-776,000

UAMY vs HL vs USAS vs CDE vs EXK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLUAMYLAGGINGEXK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CDE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.6B annually — 65.4x UAMY's $39M. HL is the more profitable business, keeping 35.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to USAS's -56.2%. On growth, EXK holds the edge at +154.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricUAMY logoUAMYUnited States Ant…HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…USAS logoUSASAmericas Gold and…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$39M$1.6B$109M$2.6B$330M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$7M$853M-$7M$1.2B$49M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$4M$559M-$61M$799M-$94M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$37M$472M-$52M$915M-$129M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+25.2%+50.9%+3.3%+35.4%+9.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-21.5%+44.1%-25.5%+39.4%-1.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-11.1%+35.6%-56.2%+31.1%-28.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-95.5%+30.0%-47.7%+35.6%-39.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+89.6%+57.4%+45.6%+137.8%+154.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-160.0%+55.3%+4.9%-97.5%
HL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CDE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 20.1x trailing earnings, CDE trades at a 45% valuation discount to HL's 36.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CDE's 11.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EXK's 76.0x.

MetricUAMY logoUAMYUnited States Ant…HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…USAS logoUSASAmericas Gold and…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …
Market CapShares × price$1.5B$12.1B$2.0B$11.6B$3.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.5B$12.2B$2.0B$11.4B$3.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-275.50x36.92x-15.19x20.13x-78.08x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.193.82x19.07x27.70x9.10x14.34x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.39x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple17.25x11.19x76.02x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue39.31x8.53x20.24x5.62x13.72x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share9.67x4.58x12.65x3.56x5.07x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF39.11x17.48x
CDE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CDE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

HL delivers a 22.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-122 for USAS. UAMY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to USAS's 0.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HL scores 8/9 vs USAS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricUAMY logoUAMYUnited States Ant…HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…USAS logoUSASAmericas Gold and…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-6.1%+22.5%-122.1%+15.2%-18.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-5.4%+16.3%-26.1%+11.2%-9.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-10.3%+15.3%-26.3%+23.5%+1.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-9.7%+16.8%-21.6%+23.9%+1.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–948364
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.12x0.45x0.11x0.25x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$30M$57M$4M-$188M$14M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$30M$242M$20M$554M$106M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$185,048$299M$24M$365M$120M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense19.04x-18.89x47.33x-39.17x
CDE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

UAMY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in UAMY five years ago would be worth $126,116 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,574 for USAS. Over the past 12 months, USAS leads with a +418.7% total return vs UAMY's +190.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UAMY at 2.2% vs EXK's 34.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricUAMY logoUAMYUnited States Ant…HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…USAS logoUSASAmericas Gold and…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+85.8%-4.1%+24.9%+3.2%+12.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+190.8%+271.0%+418.7%+216.1%+193.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3150.7%+194.9%+490.7%+414.6%+144.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1161.2%+150.3%+35.7%+96.0%+61.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3700.0%+360.6%-5.1%+149.9%+182.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+2.2%+43.4%+80.8%+72.6%+34.6%
UAMY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — HL and EXK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HL is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USAS's 2.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EXK currently trades 67.0% from its 52-week high vs HL's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricUAMY logoUAMYUnited States Ant…HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…USAS logoUSASAmericas Gold and…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.99x1.51x2.50x1.89x1.80x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$19.71$34.17$10.50$27.77$15.15
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.94$4.68$1.06$5.55$3.14
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+55.9%+52.9%+60.8%+65.2%+67.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10062.546.656.349.347.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded12.4M15.4M5.8M22.2M9.4M
Evenly matched — HL and EXK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

UAMY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: UAMY as "Buy", HL as "Hold", USAS as "Buy", CDE as "Buy", EXK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.1% upside for CDE (target: $29) vs 22.5% for UAMY (target: $14).

MetricUAMY logoUAMYUnited States Ant…HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…USAS logoUSASAmericas Gold and…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$13.50$23.83$9.75$29.00$12.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts42642114
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1000
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.0%0.0%+0.1%0.0%
UAMY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CDE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). UAMY leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallUnited States Antimony Corp… (UAMY)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

UAMY vs HL vs USAS vs CDE vs EXK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is UAMY or HL or USAS or CDE or EXK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) is the stronger pick with 162.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) offers the better valuation at 20. 1x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — UAMY or HL or USAS or CDE or EXK?

On trailing P/E, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the cheapest at 20. 1x versus Hecla Mining Company at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, Coeur Mining, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — UAMY or HL or USAS or CDE or EXK?

Over the past 5 years, United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) delivered a total return of +1161%, compared to +35.

7% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UAMY returned +35. 8% versus USAS's -1. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — UAMY or HL or USAS or CDE or EXK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

51β versus Americas Gold and Silver Corporation's 2. 50β — meaning USAS is approximately 65% more volatile than HL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 45% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — UAMY or HL or USAS or CDE or EXK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) is pulling ahead at 162.

8% versus 5. 3% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to -519. 4% for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UAMY leads at 52. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — UAMY or HL or USAS or CDE or EXK?

Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 3% net margin versus -44. 9% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HL leads at 37. 5% versus -26. 2% for USAS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HL leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is UAMY or HL or USAS or CDE or EXK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 193. 8x for United States Antimony Corporation — 184. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDE: 60. 1% to $29. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — UAMY or HL or USAS or CDE or EXK?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is UAMY or HL or USAS or CDE or EXK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+373.

7% 10Y return). Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS) carries a higher beta of 2. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HL: +373. 7%, USAS: -1. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between UAMY and HL and USAS and CDE and EXK?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: UAMY is a small-cap high-growth stock; HL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; USAS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CDE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; EXK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

UAMY

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 44%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 28%
  • Net Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

USAS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CDE

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 68%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EXK

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 77%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform UAMY and HL and USAS and CDE and EXK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(UAMY: 89.6% · HL: 57.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.