Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
UAMY vs SCCO vs FCX vs MP vs AA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Copper
Copper
Industrial Materials
Aluminum
UAMY vs SCCO vs FCX vs MP vs AA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Copper | Copper | Industrial Materials | Aluminum |
| Market Cap | $1.54B | $148.31B | $87.11B | $12.28B | $16.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $39M | $13.42B | $26.42B | $305M | $12.74B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $4.33B | $2.73B | $-71M | $1.15B |
| Gross Margin | 25.2% | 56.7% | 27.8% | 8.3% | 13.6% |
| Operating Margin | -21.5% | 52.2% | 27.8% | -36.4% | 7.6% |
| Forward P/E | 200.4x | 25.4x | 22.4x | 274.3x | 9.0x |
| Total Debt | $185K | $7.41B | $11.50B | $1.04B | $1M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $4.30B | $3.35B | $1.17B | $1.60B |
UAMY vs SCCO vs FCX vs MP vs AA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States Antim… (UAMY) | 100 | 2249.0 | +2149.0% |
| Southern Copper Cor… (SCCO) | 100 | 474.2 | +374.2% |
| Freeport-McMoRan In… (FCX) | 100 | 523.9 | +423.9% |
| MP Materials Corp. (MP) | 100 | 693.4 | +593.4% |
| Alcoa Corporation (AA) | 100 | 557.2 | +457.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UAMY vs SCCO vs FCX vs MP vs AA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UAMY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 162.8%, EPS growth -150.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 52.6%
- 37.0% 10Y total return vs SCCO's 6.7%
- 162.8% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
SCCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.78, yield 1.7%
- Beta 1.78, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3.89x
- 32.3% margin vs MP's -23.3%
- 1.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FCX's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
FCX is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.75 vs SCCO's 1.22
MP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.40, Low D/E 43.6%, current ratio 7.24x
- Beta 1.40 vs UAMY's 1.88
- +192.7% vs FCX's +65.3%
AA is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (9.0x vs 274.3x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 162.8% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.0x vs 274.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.3% margin vs MP's -23.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.40 vs UAMY's 1.88 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FCX's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +192.7% vs FCX's +65.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.4% ROA vs UAMY's -5.4%, ROIC 38.6% vs -10.3% |
UAMY vs SCCO vs FCX vs MP vs AA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UAMY vs SCCO vs FCX vs MP vs AA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SCCO leads in 2 of 6 categories
AA leads 1 • UAMY leads 1 • FCX leads 0 • MP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SCCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCX is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.4B annually — 673.0x UAMY's $39M. SCCO is the more profitable business, keeping 32.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MP's -23.3%. On growth, UAMY holds the edge at +89.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $39M | $13.4B | $26.4B | $305M | $12.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | $7.9B | $9.6B | -$43M | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $4.3B | $2.7B | -$71M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$37M | $3.4B | $6.2B | -$314M | $567M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.2% | +56.7% | +27.8% | +8.3% | +13.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -21.5% | +52.2% | +27.8% | -36.4% | +7.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.1% | +32.3% | +10.3% | -23.3% | +9.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -95.5% | +25.5% | +23.6% | -102.8% | +4.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +89.6% | +39.0% | +12.2% | +49.1% | -13.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +54.5% | +154.2% | +121.4% | +11.8% |
Valuation Metrics
AA leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.1x trailing earnings, AA trades at a 65% valuation discount to FCX's 39.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FCX offers better value at 1.33x vs SCCO's 1.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $148.3B | $87.1B | $12.3B | $16.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $151.4B | $95.3B | $12.2B | $14.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -275.50x | 34.26x | 39.88x | -138.26x | 14.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 200.36x | 25.40x | 22.41x | 274.33x | 8.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.64x | 1.33x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 19.24x | 11.16x | — | 9.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 39.31x | 11.05x | 3.38x | 44.59x | 1.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.67x | 13.55x | 2.84x | 4.92x | 2.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 43.28x | 78.05x | — | 28.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SCCO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SCCO delivers a 42.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $-6 for UAMY. AA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SCCO's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCCO scores 8/9 vs MP's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.1% | +42.0% | +8.9% | -3.7% | +18.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.4% | +21.4% | +4.7% | -2.0% | +7.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.3% | +38.6% | +12.8% | -4.7% | +12.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.7% | +39.2% | +12.4% | -4.2% | +8.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.67x | 0.37x | 0.44x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$30M | $3.1B | $8.1B | -$123M | -$1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $4.3B | $3.4B | $1.2B | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $185,048 | $7.4B | $11.5B | $1.0B | $1M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 19.33x | 17.68x | -2.80x | 7.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UAMY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UAMY five years ago would be worth $126,116 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,433 for FCX. Over the past 12 months, MP leads with a +192.7% total return vs FCX's +65.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UAMY at 2.2% vs FCX's 19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +85.8% | +21.4% | +17.3% | +25.8% | +10.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +190.8% | +110.5% | +65.3% | +192.7% | +158.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3150.7% | +151.0% | +70.7% | +221.7% | +73.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1161.2% | +167.4% | +44.3% | +149.7% | +56.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3700.0% | +668.4% | +507.7% | +591.3% | +203.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.2% | +35.9% | +19.5% | +47.6% | +20.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FCX and MP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MP is the less volatile stock with a 1.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UAMY's 1.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FCX currently trades 85.4% from its 52-week high vs UAMY's 55.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.88x | 1.78x | 1.79x | 1.40x | 1.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.71 | $223.89 | $70.97 | $100.25 | $75.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.94 | $85.72 | $35.15 | $18.64 | $24.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.9% | +80.2% | +85.4% | +69.0% | +82.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.5 | 54.1 | 49.1 | 66.8 | 44.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12.4M | 1.6M | 15.4M | 5.6M | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SCCO and FCX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UAMY as "Buy", SCCO as "Hold", FCX as "Buy", MP as "Buy", AA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.5% upside for UAMY (target: $14) vs -12.9% for SCCO (target: $156). For income investors, SCCO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.65% vs AA's 0.63%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.50 | $156.40 | $67.00 | $78.25 | $68.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 30 | 41 | 11 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% | +1.0% | — | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 5 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.96 | $0.60 | — | $0.39 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SCCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
UAMY vs SCCO vs FCX vs MP vs AA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UAMY or SCCO or FCX or MP or AA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) is the stronger pick with 162.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Alcoa Corporation (AA) offers the better valuation at 14. 1x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UAMY or SCCO or FCX or MP or AA?
On trailing P/E, Alcoa Corporation (AA) is the cheapest at 14.
1x versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. at 39. 9x. On forward P/E, Alcoa Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Freeport-McMoRan Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 22x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UAMY or SCCO or FCX or MP or AA?
Over the past 5 years, United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) delivered a total return of +1161%, compared to +44.
3% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UAMY returned +37. 0% versus AA's +203. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UAMY or SCCO or FCX or MP or AA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MP Materials Corp.
(MP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 40β versus United States Antimony Corporation's 1. 88β — meaning UAMY is approximately 34% more volatile than MP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alcoa Corporation (AA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 67% for Southern Copper Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UAMY or SCCO or FCX or MP or AA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) is pulling ahead at 162.
8% versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alcoa Corporation grew EPS 1486% year-over-year, compared to -150. 0% for United States Antimony Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, UAMY leads at 52. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UAMY or SCCO or FCX or MP or AA?
Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
3% net margin versus -31. 2% for MP Materials Corp. — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCCO leads at 52. 2% versus -44. 6% for MP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SCCO leads at 56. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UAMY or SCCO or FCX or MP or AA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 22x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Alcoa Corporation (AA) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 274. 3x for MP Materials Corp. — 265. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UAMY: 22. 5% to $13. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — UAMY or SCCO or FCX or MP or AA?
In this comparison, SCCO (1.
7% yield), FCX (1. 0% yield), AA (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. UAMY, MP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UAMY or SCCO or FCX or MP or AA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
7% yield, +668. 4% 10Y return). United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) carries a higher beta of 1. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCCO: +668. 4%, UAMY: +37. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UAMY and SCCO and FCX and MP and AA?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: UAMY is a small-cap high-growth stock; SCCO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FCX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AA is a mid-cap deep-value stock. SCCO, FCX, AA pay a dividend while UAMY, MP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.