Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
UCL vs SHEN vs TMUS vs VZ vs T
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
UCL vs SHEN vs TMUS vs VZ vs T — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $43M | $898M | $210.16B | $198.61B | $176.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $85M | $266M | $90.53B | $138.19B | $126.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $-36M | $10.54B | $17.17B | $21.41B |
| Gross Margin | 49.8% | 37.9% | 54.3% | 55.7% | 79.7% |
| Operating Margin | -1.5% | -10.3% | 20.4% | 21.2% | 19.4% |
| Forward P/E | 104.6x | — | 18.5x | 9.5x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $642M | $122.27B | $200.59B | $173.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $27M | $5.60B | $19.05B | $18.23B |
UCL vs SHEN vs TMUS vs VZ vs T — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| uCloudlink Group In… (UCL) | 100 | 6.9 | -93.1% |
| Shenandoah Telecomm… (SHEN) | 100 | 32.9 | -67.1% |
| T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) | 100 | 186.5 | +86.5% |
| Verizon Communicati… (VZ) | 100 | 85.4 | -14.6% |
| AT&T Inc. (T) | 100 | 110.7 | +10.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UCL vs SHEN vs TMUS vs VZ vs T
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UCL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 7.1%, EPS growth 14.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 45.8%, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 0.61, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 0.61 vs SHEN's 0.89, lower leverage
SHEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 9.1% revenue growth vs VZ's 2.5%
- +41.3% vs TMUS's -21.2%
TMUS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 407.2% 10Y total return vs T's 41.9%
- PEG 0.62 vs UCL's 2.27
- Better valuation composite
VZ is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta -0.11, yield 5.8%
- 5.8% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs SHEN's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
T is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 16.9% margin vs SHEN's -13.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.1% revenue growth vs VZ's 2.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.9% margin vs SHEN's -13.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs SHEN's 0.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.8% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs SHEN's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.3% vs TMUS's -21.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.9% ROA vs SHEN's -2.0%, ROIC 363.4% vs -1.1% |
UCL vs SHEN vs TMUS vs VZ vs T — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UCL vs SHEN vs TMUS vs VZ vs T — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UCL leads in 2 of 6 categories
VZ leads 1 • SHEN leads 0 • TMUS leads 0 • T leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — VZ and T each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $138.2B annually — 1621.2x UCL's $85M. T is the more profitable business, keeping 16.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SHEN's -13.7%. On growth, TMUS holds the edge at +10.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $85M | $266M | $90.5B | $138.2B | $126.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $236,000 | $104M | $29.9B | $47.6B | $45.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | -$36M | $10.5B | $17.2B | $21.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | -$276M | $10.7B | $19.8B | $10.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.8% | +37.9% | +54.3% | +55.7% | +79.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | -10.3% | +20.4% | +21.2% | +19.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | -13.7% | +11.6% | +12.4% | +16.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.4% | -103.5% | +11.8% | +14.3% | +8.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.0% | -100.0% | +10.6% | +2.0% | +2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.2% | -18.2% | -12.0% | -53.4% | -11.5% |
Valuation Metrics
UCL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.9x trailing earnings, UCL trades at a 95% valuation discount to TMUS's 20.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UCL offers better value at 0.02x vs TMUS's 0.67x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $43M | $898M | $210.2B | $198.6B | $176.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23M | $1.5B | $326.8B | $380.2B | $332.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.95x | -22.86x | 19.98x | 11.60x | 8.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 104.59x | — | 18.45x | 9.52x | 10.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.02x | — | 0.67x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.39x | 13.80x | 10.13x | 7.99x | 7.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.47x | 2.51x | 2.38x | 1.44x | 1.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.98x | 0.92x | 3.71x | 1.88x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.27x | — | 20.32x | 9.87x | 9.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UCL leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UCL delivers a 32.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-4 for SHEN. UCL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TMUS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), T scores 7/9 vs SHEN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +32.4% | -3.7% | +17.8% | +16.4% | +16.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.9% | -2.0% | +4.9% | +4.4% | +5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | -1.1% | +8.1% | +8.0% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.8% | -1.3% | +9.8% | +8.8% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.66x | 2.07x | 1.90x | 1.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$20M | $614M | $116.7B | $181.5B | $155.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $27M | $5.6B | $19.0B | $18.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $642M | $122.3B | $200.6B | $174.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 22.37x | -0.65x | 5.33x | 4.39x | 4.97x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SHEN and TMUS and T each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TMUS five years ago would be worth $14,546 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,065 for UCL. Over the past 12 months, SHEN leads with a +41.3% total return vs TMUS's -21.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors T at 18.6% vs UCL's -35.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -31.3% | +43.5% | -2.2% | +19.7% | +5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.6% | +41.3% | -21.2% | +13.6% | -6.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.9% | -13.6% | +40.4% | +45.9% | +67.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.3% | -27.9% | +45.5% | +2.8% | +29.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.4% | +21.6% | +407.2% | +41.6% | +41.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.3% | -4.8% | +12.0% | +13.4% | +18.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SHEN and TMUS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TMUS is the less volatile stock with a -0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHEN's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHEN currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs UCL's 27.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | 0.89x | -0.28x | -0.11x | -0.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.19 | $17.34 | $261.56 | $51.68 | $29.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.10 | $9.66 | $181.36 | $10.60 | $22.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.2% | +93.6% | +74.2% | +91.1% | +84.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.1 | 55.2 | 45.5 | 49.3 | 38.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 300K | 5.6M | 24.3M | 33.7M |
Analyst Outlook
VZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SHEN as "Buy", TMUS as "Buy", VZ as "Hold", T as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 78.7% upside for SHEN (target: $29) vs 9.5% for VZ (target: $52). For income investors, VZ offers the higher dividend yield at 5.76% vs SHEN's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.00 | $254.08 | $51.56 | $29.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 | 54 | 60 | 62 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | +1.9% | +5.8% | +4.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 3 | 11 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.12 | $3.64 | $2.71 | $1.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.7% | 0.0% | +2.6% |
UCL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). VZ leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
UCL vs SHEN vs TMUS vs VZ vs T: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UCL or SHEN or TMUS or VZ or T a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the stronger pick with 9.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL) offers the better valuation at 0. 9x trailing P/E (104. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UCL or SHEN or TMUS or VZ or T?
On trailing P/E, uCloudlink Group Inc.
(UCL) is the cheapest at 0. 9x versus T-Mobile US, Inc. at 20. 0x. On forward P/E, Verizon Communications Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: T-Mobile US, Inc. wins at 0. 62x versus uCloudlink Group Inc. 's 2. 27x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UCL or SHEN or TMUS or VZ or T?
Over the past 5 years, T-Mobile US, Inc.
(TMUS) delivered a total return of +45. 5%, compared to -89. 3% for uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TMUS returned +407. 2% versus UCL's -93. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UCL or SHEN or TMUS or VZ or T?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), T-Mobile US, Inc.
(TMUS) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 28β versus Shenandoah Telecommunications Company's 0. 89β — meaning SHEN is approximately -416% more volatile than TMUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 2% for T-Mobile US, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UCL or SHEN or TMUS or VZ or T?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is pulling ahead at 9.
1% versus 2. 5% for Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: uCloudlink Group Inc. grew EPS 1479% year-over-year, compared to -120. 1% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHEN leads at 12. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UCL or SHEN or TMUS or VZ or T?
AT&T Inc.
(T) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 4% net margin versus -11. 0% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TMUS leads at 21. 2% versus -6. 2% for SHEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — T leads at 79. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UCL or SHEN or TMUS or VZ or T more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus uCloudlink Group Inc. 's 2. 27x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 104. 6x for uCloudlink Group Inc. — 95. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHEN: 78. 7% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — UCL or SHEN or TMUS or VZ or T?
In this comparison, VZ (5.
8% yield), T (4. 5% yield), TMUS (1. 9% yield), SHEN (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. UCL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UCL or SHEN or TMUS or VZ or T better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, T-Mobile US, Inc.
(TMUS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 28), 1. 9% yield, +407. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TMUS: +407. 2%, UCL: -93. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UCL and SHEN and TMUS and VZ and T?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: UCL is a small-cap deep-value stock; SHEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TMUS is a large-cap quality compounder stock; VZ is a mid-cap deep-value stock; T is a mid-cap deep-value stock. SHEN, TMUS, VZ, T pay a dividend while UCL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 22%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 10%
- Dividend Yield > 1.8%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.