UCL
uCloudlink Group Inc.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$43M
5Y Perf.-93.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
UCL vs VZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$198.61B
5Y Perf.-14.6%
UCL vs VZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | UCL | VZ |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $43M | $198.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $85M | $138.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $17.17B |
| Gross Margin | 49.8% | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | -1.5% | 21.2% |
| Forward P/E | 104.6x | 9.5x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $200.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $19.05B |
UCL vs VZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
UCL
VZ
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| uCloudlink Group In… (UCL) | 100 | 6.9 | -93.1% |
| Verizon Communicati… (VZ) | 100 | 85.4 | -14.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UCL vs VZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: VZ leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. uCloudlink Group Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
UCL
uCloudlink Group Inc.
The Growth Play
UCL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 7.1%, EPS growth 14.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 45.8%, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 0.61, current ratio 1.32x
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
VZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 41.6% 10Y total return vs UCL's -93.4%
- Lower P/E (9.5x vs 104.6x)
- 12.4% margin vs UCL's 9.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | UCL | 7.1% revenue growth vs VZ's 2.5% |
| Value | VZ | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 104.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | VZ | 12.4% margin vs UCL's 9.2% |
| Stability / Safety | UCL | Lower D/E ratio (45.8% vs 189.7%) |
| Dividends | VZ | 5.8% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | VZ | +13.6% vs UCL's -2.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | UCL | 11.9% ROA vs VZ's 4.4%, ROIC 363.4% vs 8.0% |
UCL vs VZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
UCL vs VZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLVZLAGGINGUCL
UCLuCloudlink Group Inc.
2leads
VZVerizon Communication…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs UCLMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
VZ5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
UCL4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
UCL9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
VZ6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
VZ2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VZ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $138.2B annually — 1621.2x UCL's $85M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.4% (VZ) to 9.2% (UCL). On growth, VZ holds the edge at +2.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | UCLuCloudlink Group … | VZVerizon Communica… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $85M | $138.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $236,000 | $47.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $17.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $19.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.8% | +55.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | +21.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | +12.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.4% | +14.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.0% | +2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.2% | -53.4% |
VZ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
UCL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.9x trailing earnings, UCL trades at a 92% valuation discount to VZ's 11.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UCL's 3.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VZ's 8.0x.
| Metric | UCLuCloudlink Group … | VZVerizon Communica… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $43M | $198.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23M | $380.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.95x | 11.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 104.59x | 9.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.02x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.39x | 7.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.47x | 1.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.98x | 1.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.27x | 9.87x |
UCL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UCL leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UCL delivers a 32.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $16 for VZ. UCL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VZ's 1.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UCL scores 5/9 vs VZ's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | UCLuCloudlink Group … | VZVerizon Communica… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +32.4% | +16.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.9% | +4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | +8.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.8% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 1.90x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$20M | $181.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $19.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $200.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 22.37x | 4.39x |
UCL leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VZ leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VZ five years ago would be worth $10,277 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,065 for UCL. Over the past 12 months, VZ leads with a +13.6% total return vs UCL's -2.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VZ at 13.4% vs UCL's -35.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | UCLuCloudlink Group … | VZVerizon Communica… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -31.3% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.6% | +13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.9% | +45.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.3% | +2.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.4% | +41.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.3% | +13.4% |
VZ leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VZ is the less volatile stock with a -0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UCL's 0.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VZ currently trades 91.1% from its 52-week high vs UCL's 27.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | UCLuCloudlink Group … | VZVerizon Communica… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | -0.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.19 | $51.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.10 | $10.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.2% | +91.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.1 | 49.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 24.3M |
VZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
VZ is the only dividend payer here at 5.76% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | UCLuCloudlink Group … | VZVerizon Communica… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $51.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
VZ leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). UCL leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
Best OverallVerizon Communications Inc. (VZ)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
UCL vs VZ: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UCL or VZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, uCloudlink Group Inc.
(UCL) is the stronger pick with 7. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL) offers the better valuation at 0. 9x trailing P/E (104. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) a "Hold" — based on 60 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UCL or VZ?
On trailing P/E, uCloudlink Group Inc.
(UCL) is the cheapest at 0. 9x versus Verizon Communications Inc. at 11. 6x. On forward P/E, Verizon Communications Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UCL or VZ?
Over the past 5 years, Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) delivered a total return of +2. 8%, compared to -89. 3% for uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VZ returned +41. 6% versus UCL's -93. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UCL or VZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 11β versus uCloudlink Group Inc. 's 0. 61β — meaning UCL is approximately -678% more volatile than VZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 190% for Verizon Communications Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UCL or VZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), uCloudlink Group Inc.
(UCL) is pulling ahead at 7. 1% versus 2. 5% for Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: uCloudlink Group Inc. grew EPS 1479% year-over-year, compared to -2. 2% for Verizon Communications Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UCL leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UCL or VZ?
Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 4% net margin versus 5. 0% for uCloudlink Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VZ leads at 21. 2% versus 4. 8% for UCL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UCL leads at 48. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UCL or VZ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 104. 6x for uCloudlink Group Inc. — 95. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — UCL or VZ?
In this comparison, VZ (5.
8% yield) pays a dividend. UCL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UCL or VZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 11), 5. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VZ: +41. 6%, UCL: -93. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UCL and VZ?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
VZ pays a dividend while UCL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(UCL: -16.0% · VZ: 2.0%)Net Margin>
%
(UCL: 9.2% · VZ: 12.4%)P/E Ratio<
x
(UCL: 0.9x · VZ: 11.6x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.