Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

UCL vs VZ vs TMUS vs SHEN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
UCL
uCloudlink Group Inc.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$43M
5Y Perf.-93.1%
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$198.61B
5Y Perf.-14.6%
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$210.16B
5Y Perf.+86.5%
SHEN
Shenandoah Telecommunications Company

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$898M
5Y Perf.-67.1%

UCL vs VZ vs TMUS vs SHEN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
UCL logoUCL
VZ logoVZ
TMUS logoTMUS
SHEN logoSHEN
IndustryTelecommunications ServicesTelecommunications ServicesTelecommunications ServicesTelecommunications Services
Market Cap$43M$198.61B$210.16B$898M
Revenue (TTM)$85M$138.19B$90.53B$266M
Net Income (TTM)$8M$17.17B$10.54B$-36M
Gross Margin49.8%55.7%54.3%37.9%
Operating Margin-1.5%21.2%20.4%-10.3%
Forward P/E104.6x9.5x18.5x
Total Debt$10M$200.59B$122.27B$642M
Cash & Equiv.$30M$19.05B$5.60B$27M

UCL vs VZ vs TMUS vs SHENLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

UCL
VZ
TMUS
SHEN
StockJun 20May 26Return
uCloudlink Group In… (UCL)1006.9-93.1%
Verizon Communicati… (VZ)10085.4-14.6%
T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS)100186.5+86.5%
Shenandoah Telecomm… (SHEN)10032.9-67.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: UCL vs VZ vs TMUS vs SHEN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: VZ leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. uCloudlink Group Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. SHEN also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
UCL
uCloudlink Group Inc.
The Defensive Pick

UCL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 45.8%, current ratio 1.32x
  • Beta 0.61, current ratio 1.32x
  • Beta 0.61 vs SHEN's 0.89, lower leverage
  • 11.9% ROA vs SHEN's -2.0%, ROIC 363.4% vs -1.1%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
The Income Pick

VZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta -0.11, yield 5.8%
  • Better valuation composite
  • 12.4% margin vs SHEN's -13.7%
  • 5.8% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs TMUS's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

TMUS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 407.2% 10Y total return vs VZ's 41.6%
  • PEG 0.62 vs UCL's 2.27
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
SHEN
Shenandoah Telecommunications Company
The Growth Play

SHEN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 9.1%, EPS growth -120.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.9%
  • 9.1% revenue growth vs VZ's 2.5%
  • +41.3% vs TMUS's -21.2%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSHEN logoSHEN9.1% revenue growth vs VZ's 2.5%
ValueVZ logoVZBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsVZ logoVZ12.4% margin vs SHEN's -13.7%
Stability / SafetyUCL logoUCLBeta 0.61 vs SHEN's 0.89, lower leverage
DividendsVZ logoVZ5.8% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs TMUS's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)SHEN logoSHEN+41.3% vs TMUS's -21.2%
Efficiency (ROA)UCL logoUCL11.9% ROA vs SHEN's -2.0%, ROIC 363.4% vs -1.1%

UCL vs VZ vs TMUS vs SHEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

UCLuCloudlink Group Inc.
FY 2024
Others Member
100.0%$1M
VZVerizon Communications Inc.
FY 2025
Verizon Consumer Group
78.6%$106.8B
Verizon Business Group
21.4%$29.1B
TMUST-Mobile US, Inc.
FY 2025
Branded Postpaid Revenue
65.6%$57.9B
Product, Equipment
18.1%$16.0B
Branded Prepaid Revenue
11.9%$10.5B
Wholesale Service Revenue
3.3%$2.9B
Product and Service, Other
1.2%$1.0B
SHENShenandoah Telecommunications Company
FY 2025
Service
100.0%$351M

UCL vs VZ vs TMUS vs SHEN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLUCLLAGGINGSHEN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

VZ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

VZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $138.2B annually — 1621.2x UCL's $85M. VZ is the more profitable business, keeping 12.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SHEN's -13.7%. On growth, TMUS holds the edge at +10.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricUCL logoUCLuCloudlink Group …VZ logoVZVerizon Communica…TMUS logoTMUST-Mobile US, Inc.SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$85M$138.2B$90.5B$266M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$236,000$47.6B$29.9B$104M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$8M$17.2B$10.5B-$36M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$5M$19.8B$10.7B-$276M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+49.8%+55.7%+54.3%+37.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-1.5%+21.2%+20.4%-10.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.2%+12.4%+11.6%-13.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-6.4%+14.3%+11.8%-103.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-16.0%+2.0%+10.6%-100.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+21.2%-53.4%-12.0%-18.2%
VZ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

UCL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 0.9x trailing earnings, UCL trades at a 95% valuation discount to TMUS's 20.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UCL offers better value at 0.02x vs TMUS's 0.67x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricUCL logoUCLuCloudlink Group …VZ logoVZVerizon Communica…TMUS logoTMUST-Mobile US, Inc.SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…
Market CapShares × price$43M$198.6B$210.2B$898M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$23M$380.2B$326.8B$1.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS0.95x11.60x19.98x-22.86x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.104.59x9.52x18.45x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.02x0.67x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.39x7.99x10.13x13.80x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.47x1.44x2.38x2.51x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.98x1.88x3.71x0.92x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.27x9.87x20.32x
UCL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

UCL leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

UCL delivers a 32.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-4 for SHEN. UCL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TMUS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TMUS scores 6/9 vs SHEN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricUCL logoUCLuCloudlink Group …VZ logoVZVerizon Communica…TMUS logoTMUST-Mobile US, Inc.SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+32.4%+16.4%+17.8%-3.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+11.9%+4.4%+4.9%-2.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.6%+8.0%+8.1%-1.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+21.8%+8.8%+9.8%-1.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95463
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.46x1.90x2.07x0.66x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$20M$181.5B$116.7B$614M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$30M$19.0B$5.6B$27M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$10M$200.6B$122.3B$642M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense22.37x4.39x5.33x-0.65x
UCL leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — VZ and TMUS and SHEN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TMUS five years ago would be worth $14,546 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,065 for UCL. Over the past 12 months, SHEN leads with a +41.3% total return vs TMUS's -21.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VZ at 13.4% vs UCL's -35.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricUCL logoUCLuCloudlink Group …VZ logoVZVerizon Communica…TMUS logoTMUST-Mobile US, Inc.SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-31.3%+19.7%-2.2%+43.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-2.6%+13.6%-21.2%+41.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-72.9%+45.9%+40.4%-13.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-89.3%+2.8%+45.5%-27.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-93.4%+41.6%+407.2%+21.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-35.3%+13.4%+12.0%-4.8%
Evenly matched — VZ and TMUS and SHEN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TMUS and SHEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TMUS is the less volatile stock with a -0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHEN's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHEN currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs UCL's 27.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricUCL logoUCLuCloudlink Group …VZ logoVZVerizon Communica…TMUS logoTMUST-Mobile US, Inc.SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.61x-0.11x-0.28x0.89x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.19$51.68$261.56$17.34
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.10$10.60$181.36$9.66
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+27.2%+91.1%+74.2%+93.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10029.149.345.555.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded7K24.3M5.6M300K
Evenly matched — TMUS and SHEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

VZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: VZ as "Hold", TMUS as "Buy", SHEN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 78.7% upside for SHEN (target: $29) vs 9.5% for VZ (target: $52). For income investors, VZ offers the higher dividend yield at 5.76% vs SHEN's 0.72%.

MetricUCL logoUCLuCloudlink Group …VZ logoVZVerizon Communica…TMUS logoTMUST-Mobile US, Inc.SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$51.56$254.08$29.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts60548
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+5.8%+1.9%+0.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1133
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.71$3.64$0.12
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+4.7%0.0%
VZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

VZ leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). UCL leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OveralluCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

UCL vs VZ vs TMUS vs SHEN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is UCL or VZ or TMUS or SHEN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the stronger pick with 9.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL) offers the better valuation at 0. 9x trailing P/E (104. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) a "Buy" — based on 54 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — UCL or VZ or TMUS or SHEN?

On trailing P/E, uCloudlink Group Inc.

(UCL) is the cheapest at 0. 9x versus T-Mobile US, Inc. at 20. 0x. On forward P/E, Verizon Communications Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: T-Mobile US, Inc. wins at 0. 62x versus uCloudlink Group Inc. 's 2. 27x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — UCL or VZ or TMUS or SHEN?

Over the past 5 years, T-Mobile US, Inc.

(TMUS) delivered a total return of +45. 5%, compared to -89. 3% for uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TMUS returned +407. 2% versus UCL's -93. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — UCL or VZ or TMUS or SHEN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), T-Mobile US, Inc.

(TMUS) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 28β versus Shenandoah Telecommunications Company's 0. 89β — meaning SHEN is approximately -416% more volatile than TMUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 2% for T-Mobile US, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — UCL or VZ or TMUS or SHEN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is pulling ahead at 9.

1% versus 2. 5% for Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: uCloudlink Group Inc. grew EPS 1479% year-over-year, compared to -120. 1% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHEN leads at 12. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — UCL or VZ or TMUS or SHEN?

T-Mobile US, Inc.

(TMUS) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 4% net margin versus -11. 0% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company — meaning it keeps 12. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TMUS leads at 21. 2% versus -6. 2% for SHEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UCL leads at 48. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is UCL or VZ or TMUS or SHEN more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus uCloudlink Group Inc. 's 2. 27x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 104. 6x for uCloudlink Group Inc. — 95. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHEN: 78. 7% to $29. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — UCL or VZ or TMUS or SHEN?

In this comparison, VZ (5.

8% yield), TMUS (1. 9% yield), SHEN (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. UCL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is UCL or VZ or TMUS or SHEN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, T-Mobile US, Inc.

(TMUS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 28), 1. 9% yield, +407. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TMUS: +407. 2%, UCL: -93. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between UCL and VZ and TMUS and SHEN?

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: UCL is a small-cap deep-value stock; VZ is a mid-cap deep-value stock; TMUS is a large-cap quality compounder stock; SHEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. VZ, TMUS, SHEN pay a dividend while UCL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

UCL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

VZ

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.3%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TMUS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHEN

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 22%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform UCL and VZ and TMUS and SHEN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(UCL: -16.0% · VZ: 2.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(UCL: 9.2% · VZ: 12.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(UCL: 0.9x · VZ: 11.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.