Uranium
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
UEC vs XOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Integrated
UEC vs XOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Uranium | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $7.63B | $620.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20M | $323.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-82M | $28.84B |
| Gross Margin | 28.3% | 21.7% |
| Operating Margin | -5.5% | 10.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.8x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $43.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $149M | $10.68B |
UEC vs XOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) | 100 | 1484.8 | +1384.8% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 322.2 | +222.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UEC vs XOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UEC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 297.4%, EPS growth -172.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 42.4%
- 19.8% 10Y total return vs XOM's 105.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.79, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 8.85x
XOM is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and dividends.
- 8.9% margin vs UEC's -403.6%
- 2.7% yield; 26-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
- 6.4% ROA vs UEC's -6.4%, ROIC 8.6% vs -7.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 297.4% revenue growth vs XOM's -4.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.9% margin vs UEC's -403.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (0.2% vs 16.3%) | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield; 26-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +170.2% vs XOM's +43.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs UEC's -6.4%, ROIC 8.6% vs -7.2% |
UEC vs XOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UEC vs XOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 16034.9x UEC's $20M. XOM is the more profitable business, keeping 8.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UEC's -4.0%. On growth, XOM holds the edge at -1.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20M | $323.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$104M | $59.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$82M | $28.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$122M | $23.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.3% | +21.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.5% | +10.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.0% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -59.4% | -1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.0% | -11.0% |
Valuation Metrics
XOM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.6B | $620.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.5B | $653.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -77.95x | 21.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 114.12x | 1.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.78x | 2.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 26.29x |
Profitability & Efficiency
XOM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XOM delivers a 10.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-7 for UEC. UEC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XOM's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UEC scores 5/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.1% | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.4% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.2% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.6% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$149M | $32.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $149M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $43.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -185.47x | 69.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UEC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UEC five years ago would be worth $46,677 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26,464 for XOM. Over the past 12 months, UEC leads with a +170.2% total return vs XOM's +43.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UEC at 80.8% vs XOM's 13.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.9% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +170.2% | +43.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +490.5% | +44.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +366.8% | +164.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1978.4% | +105.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +80.8% | +13.2% |
Risk & Volatility
XOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UEC's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XOM currently trades 83.0% from its 52-week high vs UEC's 76.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.79x | -0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.34 | $176.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.03 | $101.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.6% | +83.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.1 | 42.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.2M | 18.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates UEC as "Buy" and XOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.8% upside for UEC (target: $19) vs 9.5% for XOM (target: $160). XOM is the only dividend payer here at 2.73% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.67 | $160.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 26 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $4.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.3% |
XOM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). UEC leads in 1 (Total Returns).
UEC vs XOM: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UEC or XOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Uranium Energy Corp.
(UEC) is the stronger pick with 297. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) offers the better valuation at 21. 9x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — UEC or XOM?
Over the past 5 years, Uranium Energy Corp.
(UEC) delivered a total return of +366. 8%, compared to +164. 6% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UEC returned +1978% versus XOM's +105. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — UEC or XOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus Uranium Energy Corp. 's 1. 79β — meaning UEC is approximately -1326% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 16% for Exxon Mobil Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — UEC or XOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Uranium Energy Corp.
(UEC) is pulling ahead at 297. 4% versus -4. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exxon Mobil Corporation grew EPS -14. 5% year-over-year, compared to -172. 1% for Uranium Energy Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UEC leads at 42. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — UEC or XOM?
Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
9% net margin versus -131. 1% for Uranium Energy Corp. — meaning it keeps 8. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XOM leads at 10. 5% versus -109. 7% for UEC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UEC leads at 36. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is UEC or XOM more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UEC: 19.
8% to $18. 67.
07Which pays a better dividend — UEC or XOM?
In this comparison, XOM (2.
7% yield) pays a dividend. UEC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is UEC or XOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 7% yield, +105. 0% 10Y return). Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +105. 0%, UEC: +1978%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between UEC and XOM?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: UEC is a small-cap high-growth stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. XOM pays a dividend while UEC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.