UEIC vs ROKU

For growth investors, Roku, Inc.

(ROKU) is the stronger pick with 15. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for Universal Electronics Inc. (UEIC). Roku, Inc. (ROKU) offers the better valuation at 216. 9x trailing P/E (58. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Roku, Inc. (ROKU) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Roku, Inc.

(ROKU) delivered a total return of -55. 0%, compared to -92. 6% for Universal Electronics Inc. (UEIC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ROKU returned +444. 6% versus UEIC's -93. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Universal Electronics Inc.

(UEIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 80β versus Roku, Inc. 's 2. 10β — meaning ROKU is approximately 163% more volatile than UEIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Universal Electronics Inc. (UEIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 33% for Roku, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Roku, Inc.

(ROKU) is pulling ahead at 15. 2% versus -6. 7% for Universal Electronics Inc. (UEIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Roku, Inc. grew EPS 166. 3% year-over-year, compared to 23. 8% for Universal Electronics Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROKU leads at 14. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Roku, Inc.

(ROKU) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 9% net margin versus -5. 1% for Universal Electronics Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UEIC leads at -0. 0% versus -0. 1% for ROKU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ROKU leads at 43. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Universal Electronics Inc.

(UEIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 80)). Roku, Inc. (ROKU) carries a higher beta of 2. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UEIC: -93. 3%, ROKU: +444. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (UEIC (Technology) and ROKU (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: UEIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ROKU is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.