UEIC vs ROKU vs AMZN vs NFLX

For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for Universal Electronics Inc. (UEIC). Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) offers the better valuation at 34. 9x trailing P/E (24. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Roku, Inc. (ROKU) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the cheapest at 34. 9x versus Roku, Inc. at 214. 7x. On forward P/E, Netflix, Inc. is actually cheaper at 24. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Netflix, Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 24x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to -91. 3% for Universal Electronics Inc. (UEIC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus UEIC's -93. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Roku, Inc. 's 2. 10β — meaning ROKU is approximately 439% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Universal Electronics Inc. (UEIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 54% for Netflix, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus -6. 7% for Universal Electronics Inc. (UEIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Roku, Inc. grew EPS 166. 3% year-over-year, compared to 23. 8% for Universal Electronics Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROKU leads at 14. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -5. 1% for Universal Electronics Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -0. 1% for ROKU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 24x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) trades at 24. 8x forward P/E versus 57. 5x for Roku, Inc. — 32. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 8% to $116. 29.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). Roku, Inc. (ROKU) carries a higher beta of 2. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, ROKU: +439. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (UEIC (Technology) and ROKU (Communication Services) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and NFLX (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: UEIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ROKU is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.