REIT - Healthcare Facilities
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
UHT vs PLTK vs HR vs GLBE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
Specialty Retail
UHT vs PLTK vs HR vs GLBE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $564M | $1.36B | $6.98B | $5.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $149M | $2.79B | $1.15B | $962M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $18M | $-295M | $-201M | $68M |
| Gross Margin | 94.4% | 73.0% | -9.7% | 45.3% |
| Operating Margin | 36.3% | -3.0% | 19.5% | 7.4% |
| Forward P/E | 23.5x | 7.2x | — | 29.2x |
| Total Debt | $386M | $2.65B | $4.15B | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $684M | $26M | $246M |
UHT vs PLTK vs HR vs GLBE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Universal Health Re… (UHT) | 100 | 58.7 | -41.3% |
| Playtika Holding Co… (PLTK) | 100 | 13.1 | -86.9% |
| Healthcare Realty T… (HR) | 100 | 65.9 | -34.1% |
| Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) | 100 | 99.3 | -0.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UHT vs PLTK vs HR vs GLBE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UHT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.24, yield 7.3%
- Beta 0.24, yield 7.3%, current ratio 15.19x
- 11.8% margin vs HR's -17.5%
PLTK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (7.2x vs 29.2x)
- 11.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs UHT's 7.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
HR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 39.6% 10Y total return vs GLBE's 28.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 88.7%, current ratio 1.75x
- Beta 0.13 vs GLBE's 1.63
- +38.2% vs PLTK's -28.3%
GLBE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.8%, EPS growth 186.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.0%
- 27.8% revenue growth vs HR's -6.9%
- 4.7% ROA vs PLTK's -8.0%, ROIC 7.7% vs 0.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.8% revenue growth vs HR's -6.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.2x vs 29.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.8% margin vs HR's -17.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs GLBE's 1.63 | |
| Dividends | 11.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs UHT's 7.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.2% vs PLTK's -28.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs PLTK's -8.0%, ROIC 7.7% vs 0.1% |
UHT vs PLTK vs HR vs GLBE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
UHT vs PLTK vs HR vs GLBE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HR leads in 2 of 6 categories
UHT leads 1 • PLTK leads 1 • GLBE leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UHT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLTK is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.8B annually — 18.8x UHT's $149M. UHT is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HR's -17.5%. On growth, UHT holds the edge at +2.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $149M | $2.8B | $1.1B | $962M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $83M | $217M | $767M | $130M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $18M | -$295M | -$201M | $68M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $50M | $561M | $201M | $295M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +94.4% | +73.0% | -9.7% | +45.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +36.3% | -3.0% | +19.5% | +7.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | -10.5% | -17.5% | +7.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.3% | +20.1% | +17.5% | +30.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.0% | +5.5% | -10.5% | +28.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.9% | -2.8% | +99.8% | — |
Valuation Metrics
PLTK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 32.0x trailing earnings, UHT trades at a 62% valuation discount to GLBE's 83.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PLTK's 14.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GLBE's 57.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $564M | $1.4B | $7.0B | $5.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $943M | $3.3B | $11.1B | $5.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.99x | -6.53x | -28.16x | 83.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.49x | 7.23x | — | 29.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.82x | 14.09x | 16.84x | 57.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.68x | 0.49x | 5.91x | 5.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.70x | — | 1.50x | 6.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.48x | 2.56x | 54.95x | 19.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GLBE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UHT delivers a 10.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-4 for HR. GLBE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UHT's 2.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HR scores 7/9 vs PLTK's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.9% | — | -4.3% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | -8.0% | -2.1% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | +0.1% | +0.7% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.9% | +0.0% | +1.0% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.53x | — | 0.89x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $379M | $2.0B | $4.1B | -$204M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $684M | $26M | $246M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $386M | $2.6B | $4.1B | $42M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.77x | -0.99x | -0.21x | 17.83x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GLBE five years ago would be worth $12,796 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,599 for PLTK. Over the past 12 months, HR leads with a +38.2% total return vs PLTK's -28.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HR at 5.5% vs PLTK's -24.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.4% | -9.7% | +19.4% | -13.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.5% | -28.3% | +38.2% | -12.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.9% | -56.8% | +17.5% | +4.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.7% | -84.0% | +1.1% | +28.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.5% | -86.1% | +39.6% | +28.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.5% | -24.4% | +5.5% | +1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
HR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HR is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GLBE's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HR currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs PLTK's 65.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.24x | 1.29x | 0.13x | 1.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.70 | $5.52 | $20.46 | $43.21 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.26 | $2.64 | $14.09 | $27.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.9% | +65.1% | +97.7% | +75.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.2 | 58.2 | 77.5 | 45.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 61K | 1.7M | 3.5M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — UHT and PLTK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UHT as "Hold", PLTK as "Hold", HR as "Hold", GLBE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 33.0% upside for GLBE (target: $43) vs -3.3% for HR (target: $19). For income investors, PLTK offers the higher dividend yield at 11.11% vs HR's 5.53%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.75 | $19.33 | $43.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 16 | 29 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.3% | +11.1% | +5.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.96 | $0.40 | $1.11 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.5% | +0.1% | +1.3% |
HR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). UHT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
UHT vs PLTK vs HR vs GLBE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UHT or PLTK or HR or GLBE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Global-e Online Ltd.
(GLBE) is the stronger pick with 27. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 9% for Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated (HR). Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) offers the better valuation at 32. 0x trailing P/E (23. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UHT or PLTK or HR or GLBE?
On trailing P/E, Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) is the cheapest at 32.
0x versus Global-e Online Ltd. at 83. 7x. On forward P/E, Playtika Holding Corp. is actually cheaper at 7. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UHT or PLTK or HR or GLBE?
Over the past 5 years, Global-e Online Ltd.
(GLBE) delivered a total return of +28. 0%, compared to -84. 0% for Playtika Holding Corp. (PLTK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HR returned +39. 6% versus PLTK's -86. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UHT or PLTK or HR or GLBE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated (HR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
13β versus Global-e Online Ltd. 's 1. 63β — meaning GLBE is approximately 1118% more volatile than HR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for Universal Health Realty Income Trust — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UHT or PLTK or HR or GLBE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Global-e Online Ltd.
(GLBE) is pulling ahead at 27. 8% versus -6. 9% for Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated (HR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Global-e Online Ltd. grew EPS 186. 7% year-over-year, compared to -225. 0% for Playtika Holding Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GLBE leads at 33. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UHT or PLTK or HR or GLBE?
Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) is the more profitable company, earning 17.
8% net margin versus -20. 8% for Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated — meaning it keeps 17. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UHT leads at 35. 0% versus 0. 0% for PLTK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UHT leads at 94. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UHT or PLTK or HR or GLBE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Playtika Holding Corp.
(PLTK) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 29. 2x for Global-e Online Ltd. — 22. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GLBE: 33. 0% to $43. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — UHT or PLTK or HR or GLBE?
In this comparison, PLTK (11.
1% yield), UHT (7. 3% yield), HR (5. 5% yield) pay a dividend. GLBE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UHT or PLTK or HR or GLBE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated (HR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
13), 5. 5% yield). Global-e Online Ltd. (GLBE) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HR: +39. 6%, GLBE: +28. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UHT and PLTK and HR and GLBE?
These companies operate in different sectors (UHT (Real Estate) and PLTK (Technology) and HR (Real Estate) and GLBE (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UHT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PLTK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GLBE is a small-cap high-growth stock. UHT, PLTK, HR pay a dividend while GLBE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.