Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
UI vs ARLO vs NTGR vs SWKS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Security & Protection Services
Communication Equipment
Semiconductors
UI vs ARLO vs NTGR vs SWKS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Security & Protection Services | Communication Equipment | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $56.06B | $1.62B | $708M | $9.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.97B | $561M | $690M | $4.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $889M | $31M | $-40M | $361M |
| Gross Margin | 45.4% | 45.1% | 37.5% | 41.1% |
| Operating Margin | 35.1% | 2.7% | -4.4% | 9.4% |
| Forward P/E | 57.5x | 18.5x | 129.4x | 13.8x |
| Total Debt | $297M | $7M | $51M | $1.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $150M | $146M | $210M | $1.16B |
UI vs ARLO vs NTGR vs SWKS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) | 100 | 502.5 | +402.5% |
| Arlo Technologies, … (ARLO) | 100 | 674.2 | +574.2% |
| NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR) | 100 | 100.6 | +0.6% |
| Skyworks Solutions,… (SWKS) | 100 | 54.9 | -45.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UI vs ARLO vs NTGR vs SWKS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 33.4%, EPS growth 103.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.0%
- 24.0% 10Y total return vs ARLO's -32.6%
- 33.4% revenue growth vs SWKS's -2.2%
- 29.9% margin vs NTGR's -5.8%
ARLO plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
NTGR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 10.2%, current ratio 2.69x
SWKS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.36, yield 4.3%
- Beta 1.36, yield 4.3%, current ratio 2.33x
- Lower P/E (13.8x vs 129.4x)
- Beta 1.36 vs UI's 2.10, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.4% revenue growth vs SWKS's -2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.8x vs 129.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.9% margin vs NTGR's -5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.36 vs UI's 2.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs UI's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +164.4% vs NTGR's -9.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 55.3% ROA vs NTGR's -4.9%, ROIC 81.4% vs -8.4% |
UI vs ARLO vs NTGR vs SWKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
UI vs ARLO vs NTGR vs SWKS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UI leads in 3 of 6 categories
SWKS leads 1 • ARLO leads 0 • NTGR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SWKS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 7.2x ARLO's $561M. UI is the more profitable business, keeping 29.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTGR's -5.8%. On growth, UI holds the edge at +35.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.0B | $561M | $690M | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $18M | -$19M | $842M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $889M | $31M | -$40M | $361M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $708M | $64M | -$11M | $697M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.4% | +45.1% | +37.5% | +41.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.1% | +2.7% | -4.4% | +9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +29.9% | +5.5% | -5.8% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | +11.5% | -1.6% | +17.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.8% | +26.3% | -2.0% | -1.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +70.8% | — | -123.8% | -44.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NTGR and SWKS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.1x trailing earnings, SWKS trades at a 80% valuation discount to ARLO's 106.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SWKS's 10.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARLO's 148.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $56.1B | $1.6B | $708M | $9.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $56.2B | $1.5B | $549M | $9.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 78.80x | 106.43x | -22.71x | 21.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 57.54x | 18.51x | 129.45x | 13.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 5.19x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 65.50x | 148.35x | — | 10.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 21.79x | 3.07x | 1.02x | 2.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 83.94x | 12.84x | 1.50x | 1.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 89.35x | 24.27x | — | 8.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UI delivers a 87.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $88 in annual profit, vs $-8 for NTGR. ARLO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UI's 0.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARLO scores 7/9 vs SWKS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +87.5% | +22.9% | -8.0% | +6.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +55.3% | +9.1% | -4.9% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +81.4% | +35.9% | -8.4% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +102.9% | +4.7% | -6.0% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.45x | 0.05x | 0.10x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $148M | -$140M | -$159M | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $150M | $146M | $210M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $297M | $7M | $51M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 77.93x | — | — | 14.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UI five years ago would be worth $33,492 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,449 for SWKS. Over the past 12 months, UI leads with a +164.4% total return vs NTGR's -9.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UI at 69.4% vs SWKS's -11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +63.8% | +12.6% | +6.5% | +2.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +164.4% | +43.3% | -9.7% | +1.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +385.7% | +116.3% | +86.5% | -30.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +234.9% | +123.1% | -33.0% | -55.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2397.3% | -32.6% | -37.7% | +31.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +69.4% | +29.3% | +23.1% | -11.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — UI and SWKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SWKS is the less volatile stock with a 1.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UI's 2.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UI currently trades 84.2% from its 52-week high vs NTGR's 70.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.10x | 1.48x | 1.39x | 1.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1099.99 | $19.94 | $36.86 | $90.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $342.27 | $10.20 | $19.00 | $51.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.2% | +74.7% | +70.2% | +71.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.8 | 54.0 | 56.1 | 55.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 93K | 1.3M | 515K | 3.3M |
Analyst Outlook
SWKS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UI as "Hold", ARLO as "Buy", NTGR as "Hold", SWKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.0% upside for NTGR (target: $36) vs -43.1% for UI (target: $527). For income investors, SWKS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.29% vs UI's 0.26%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $527.00 | $17.50 | $36.00 | $62.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 10 | 17 | 59 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | — | — | +4.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.40 | — | — | $2.79 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +2.8% | +7.2% | +0.5% |
UI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SWKS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
UI vs ARLO vs NTGR vs SWKS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UI or ARLO or NTGR or SWKS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ubiquiti Inc.
(UI) is the stronger pick with 33. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) offers the better valuation at 21. 1x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arlo Technologies, Inc. (ARLO) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UI or ARLO or NTGR or SWKS?
On trailing P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the cheapest at 21. 1x versus Arlo Technologies, Inc. at 106. 4x. On forward P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UI or ARLO or NTGR or SWKS?
Over the past 5 years, Ubiquiti Inc.
(UI) delivered a total return of +234. 9%, compared to -55. 5% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UI returned +24. 0% versus NTGR's -37. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UI or ARLO or NTGR or SWKS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 36β versus Ubiquiti Inc. 's 2. 10β — meaning UI is approximately 54% more volatile than SWKS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arlo Technologies, Inc. (ARLO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 45% for Ubiquiti Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UI or ARLO or NTGR or SWKS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ubiquiti Inc.
(UI) is pulling ahead at 33. 4% versus -2. 2% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arlo Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 145. 2% year-over-year, compared to -371. 4% for NETGEAR, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UI leads at 15. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UI or ARLO or NTGR or SWKS?
Ubiquiti Inc.
(UI) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus -4. 7% for NETGEAR, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UI leads at 32. 5% versus -5. 1% for NTGR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARLO leads at 44. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UI or ARLO or NTGR or SWKS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) trades at 13. 8x forward P/E versus 129. 4x for NETGEAR, Inc. — 115. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTGR: 39. 0% to $36. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — UI or ARLO or NTGR or SWKS?
In this comparison, SWKS (4.
3% yield), UI (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. ARLO, NTGR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UI or ARLO or NTGR or SWKS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (4. 3% yield). Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) carries a higher beta of 2. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SWKS: +31. 2%, UI: +24. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UI and ARLO and NTGR and SWKS?
These companies operate in different sectors (UI (Technology) and ARLO (Industrials) and NTGR (Technology) and SWKS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ARLO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTGR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SWKS is a small-cap income-oriented stock. SWKS pays a dividend while UI, ARLO, NTGR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.