UI vs ARLO vs NTGR vs SWKS vs QCOM

For growth investors, Ubiquiti Inc.

(UI) is the stronger pick with 33. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) offers the better valuation at 21. 1x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arlo Technologies, Inc. (ARLO) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.

(SWKS) is the cheapest at 21. 1x versus Arlo Technologies, Inc. at 106. 4x. On forward P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Ubiquiti Inc. wins at 3. 79x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 06x.

Over the past 5 years, Ubiquiti Inc.

(UI) delivered a total return of +234. 9%, compared to -55. 5% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UI returned +24. 0% versus NTGR's -37. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Skyworks Solutions, Inc.

(SWKS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 36β versus Ubiquiti Inc. 's 2. 10β — meaning UI is approximately 54% more volatile than SWKS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arlo Technologies, Inc. (ARLO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 77% for QUALCOMM Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ubiquiti Inc.

(UI) is pulling ahead at 33. 4% versus -2. 2% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arlo Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 145. 2% year-over-year, compared to -371. 4% for NETGEAR, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UI leads at 15. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Ubiquiti Inc.

(UI) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus -4. 7% for NETGEAR, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UI leads at 32. 5% versus -5. 1% for NTGR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QCOM leads at 55. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 79x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 06x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) trades at 13. 8x forward P/E versus 129. 4x for NETGEAR, Inc. — 115. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTGR: 39. 0% to $36. 00.

In this comparison, SWKS (4.

3% yield), QCOM (1. 7% yield), UI (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. ARLO, NTGR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.

7% yield, +350. 2% 10Y return). Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) carries a higher beta of 2. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QCOM: +350. 2%, UI: +24. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (UI (Technology) and ARLO (Industrials) and NTGR (Technology) and SWKS (Technology) and QCOM (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: UI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ARLO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTGR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SWKS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. SWKS, QCOM pay a dividend while UI, ARLO, NTGR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.