Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
UIS vs IBM vs ACN vs DXC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
UIS vs IBM vs ACN vs DXC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $221M | $216.93B | $112.19B | $2.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.96B | $68.91B | $72.11B | $12.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-346M | $10.75B | $7.68B | $18M |
| Gross Margin | 28.4% | 59.0% | 32.0% | 13.7% |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | 16.4% | 14.8% | 2.8% |
| Forward P/E | 4.0x | 18.6x | 13.0x | 3.8x |
| Total Debt | $803M | $67.15B | $8.18B | $4.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $414M | $13.64B | $11.48B | $1.80B |
UIS vs IBM vs ACN vs DXC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unisys Corporation (UIS) | 100 | 26.8 | -73.2% |
| International Busin… (IBM) | 100 | 193.8 | +93.8% |
| Accenture plc (ACN) | 100 | 89.4 | -10.6% |
| DXC Technology Comp… (DXC) | 100 | 84.4 | -15.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UIS vs IBM vs ACN vs DXC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UIS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IBM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 7.6%, EPS growth 73.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
- 107.8% 10Y total return vs ACN's 89.9%
- 7.6% revenue growth vs DXC's -5.8%
- 15.6% margin vs UIS's -17.7%
ACN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.85, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 25.4%, current ratio 1.42x
- PEG 1.44 vs IBM's 1.50
- Beta 0.85, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.42x
DXC is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (3.8x vs 18.6x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.6% revenue growth vs DXC's -5.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.8x vs 18.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.6% margin vs UIS's -17.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.85 vs UIS's 2.34 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs IBM's 2.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -6.1% vs ACN's -39.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs UIS's -19.4%, ROIC 26.8% vs 16.7% |
UIS vs IBM vs ACN vs DXC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
UIS vs IBM vs ACN vs DXC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBM leads in 2 of 6 categories
DXC leads 1 • ACN leads 1 • UIS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IBM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACN is the larger business by revenue, generating $72.1B annually — 36.9x UIS's $2.0B. IBM is the more profitable business, keeping 15.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UIS's -17.7%. On growth, IBM holds the edge at +9.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $68.9B | $72.1B | $12.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $241M | $15.1B | $12.1B | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$346M | $10.8B | $7.7B | $18M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$185M | $13.1B | $12.5B | $939M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.4% | +59.0% | +32.0% | +13.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +16.4% | +14.8% | +2.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.7% | +15.6% | +10.7% | +0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.5% | +19.0% | +17.3% | +7.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.3% | +9.5% | +8.3% | -1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.0% | +14.3% | +3.9% | -158.7% |
Valuation Metrics
DXC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.7x trailing earnings, DXC trades at a 72% valuation discount to IBM's 20.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ACN offers better value at 1.64x vs IBM's 1.67x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $221M | $216.9B | $112.2B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $610M | $270.4B | $108.9B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.64x | 20.70x | 14.83x | 5.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3.95x | 18.60x | 12.98x | 3.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.67x | 1.64x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.67x | 17.62x | 8.60x | 2.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.11x | 3.21x | 1.61x | 0.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 6.70x | 3.53x | 0.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.74x | 10.32x | 2.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBM delivers a 35.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $1 for DXC. ACN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IBM's 2.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DXC scores 8/9 vs UIS's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +35.4% | +23.9% | +0.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -19.4% | +7.1% | +11.8% | +0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.7% | +9.8% | +26.8% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.0% | +9.5% | +24.9% | +7.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.05x | 0.25x | 1.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $389M | $53.5B | -$3.3B | $2.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $414M | $13.6B | $11.5B | $1.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $803M | $67.2B | $8.2B | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.00x | 6.41x | 40.67x | 2.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBM five years ago would be worth $19,024 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,278 for UIS. Over the past 12 months, IBM leads with a -6.1% total return vs ACN's -39.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBM at 26.8% vs DXC's -18.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.3% | -20.1% | -29.4% | -14.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.7% | -6.1% | -39.1% | -22.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.6% | +103.6% | -25.5% | -46.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.2% | +90.2% | -29.5% | -65.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.7% | +107.8% | +89.9% | -48.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.8% | +26.8% | -9.3% | -18.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IBM and ACN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACN is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UIS's 2.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IBM currently trades 71.2% from its 52-week high vs UIS's 50.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.34x | 1.03x | 0.85x | 1.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.06 | $324.90 | $325.71 | $17.26 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.97 | $220.72 | $173.52 | $11.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.3% | +71.2% | +55.3% | +69.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 82.3 | 38.0 | 33.5 | 42.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 672K | 5.4M | 5.7M | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IBM and ACN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UIS as "Hold", IBM as "Hold", ACN as "Buy", DXC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 113.1% upside for UIS (target: $7) vs 8.3% for DXC (target: $13). For income investors, ACN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.25% vs IBM's 2.85%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.50 | $309.64 | $299.92 | $13.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 50 | 53 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.9% | +3.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 30 | 14 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.59 | $5.85 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.1% | +0.7% |
IBM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). DXC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
UIS vs IBM vs ACN vs DXC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UIS or IBM or ACN or DXC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) is the stronger pick with 7.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 8% for DXC Technology Company (DXC). DXC Technology Company (DXC) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E (3. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Accenture plc (ACN) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UIS or IBM or ACN or DXC?
On trailing P/E, DXC Technology Company (DXC) is the cheapest at 5.
7x versus International Business Machines Corporation at 20. 7x. On forward P/E, DXC Technology Company is actually cheaper at 3. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Accenture plc wins at 1. 44x versus International Business Machines Corporation's 1. 50x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UIS or IBM or ACN or DXC?
Over the past 5 years, International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) delivered a total return of +90.
2%, compared to -87. 2% for Unisys Corporation (UIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBM returned +107. 8% versus UIS's -58. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UIS or IBM or ACN or DXC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Accenture plc (ACN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
85β versus Unisys Corporation's 2. 34β — meaning UIS is approximately 176% more volatile than ACN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Accenture plc (ACN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 2% for International Business Machines Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UIS or IBM or ACN or DXC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) is pulling ahead at 7.
6% versus -5. 8% for DXC Technology Company (DXC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DXC Technology Company grew EPS 356. 5% year-over-year, compared to -71. 0% for Unisys Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACN leads at 4. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UIS or IBM or ACN or DXC?
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
7% net margin versus -17. 4% for Unisys Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBM leads at 15. 3% versus 5. 4% for DXC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBM leads at 59. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UIS or IBM or ACN or DXC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Accenture plc (ACN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 44x versus International Business Machines Corporation's 1. 50x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, DXC Technology Company (DXC) trades at 3. 8x forward P/E versus 18. 6x for International Business Machines Corporation — 14. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UIS: 113. 1% to $6. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — UIS or IBM or ACN or DXC?
In this comparison, ACN (3.
2% yield), IBM (2. 9% yield) pay a dividend. UIS, DXC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UIS or IBM or ACN or DXC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Accenture plc (ACN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
85), 3. 2% yield). Unisys Corporation (UIS) carries a higher beta of 2. 34 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACN: +89. 9%, UIS: -58. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UIS and IBM and ACN and DXC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: UIS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IBM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; ACN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; DXC is a small-cap deep-value stock. IBM, ACN pay a dividend while UIS, DXC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.