Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ULCC vs SNCY vs SKYW vs DAL vs UAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
ULCC vs SNCY vs SKYW vs DAL vs UAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services |
| Market Cap | $1.25B | $914M | $3.52B | $47.75B | $32.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.80B | $1.14B | $4.12B | $63.36B | $60.47B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-366M | $40M | $429M | $5.01B | $3.67B |
| Gross Margin | 31.2% | 66.3% | 41.9% | 24.5% | 64.2% |
| Operating Margin | -11.4% | 7.1% | 14.6% | 9.2% | 8.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.2x | 8.0x | 13.6x | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $5.46B | $592M | $2.39B | $21.08B | $31.04B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $671M | $145M | — | $4.31B | $5.94B |
ULCC vs SNCY vs SKYW vs DAL vs UAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frontier Group Hold… (ULCC) | 100 | 25.8 | -74.2% |
| Sun Country Airline… (SNCY) | 100 | 41.4 | -58.6% |
| SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW) | 100 | 176.5 | +76.5% |
| Delta Air Lines, In… (DAL) | 100 | 155.8 | +55.8% |
| United Airlines Hol… (UAL) | 100 | 183.3 | +83.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ULCC vs SNCY vs SKYW vs DAL vs UAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ULCC plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
SNCY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SKYW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.0%, EPS growth 33.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.5%
- 282.0% 10Y total return vs UAL's 118.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.49, Low D/E 87.1%, current ratio 0.65x
- Beta 1.49, current ratio 0.65x
DAL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.93, yield 0.9%
- 0.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +63.0% vs SKYW's -9.6%
- 6.2% ROA vs ULCC's -5.3%, ROIC 12.0% vs -2.3%
Among these 5 stocks, UAL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.0% revenue growth vs ULCC's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.0x vs 10.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.4% margin vs ULCC's -9.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.49 vs ULCC's 2.84, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +63.0% vs SKYW's -9.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.2% ROA vs ULCC's -5.3%, ROIC 12.0% vs -2.3% |
ULCC vs SNCY vs SKYW vs DAL vs UAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ULCC vs SNCY vs SKYW vs DAL vs UAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SKYW leads in 3 of 6 categories
DAL leads 1 • ULCC leads 0 • SNCY leads 0 • UAL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SKYW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $63.4B annually — 55.7x SNCY's $1.1B. SKYW is the more profitable business, keeping 10.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ULCC's -9.6%. On growth, UAL holds the edge at +10.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.8B | $1.1B | $4.1B | $63.4B | $60.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$300M | $180M | $967M | $8.9B | $8.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$366M | $40M | $429M | $5.0B | $3.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$481M | $72M | $339M | $3.8B | $3.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.2% | +66.3% | +41.9% | +24.5% | +64.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.4% | +7.1% | +14.6% | +9.2% | +8.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.6% | +3.5% | +10.4% | +7.9% | +6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.6% | +6.3% | +8.2% | +6.1% | +5.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.8% | +3.6% | +6.8% | +2.9% | +10.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.2% | -34.8% | +3.3% | +44.2% | +84.5% |
Valuation Metrics
SKYW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, SKYW trades at a 52% valuation discount to SNCY's 17.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SKYW's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DAL's 7.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $914M | $3.5B | $47.8B | $32.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.0B | $1.4B | $5.9B | $64.5B | $57.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.05x | 17.56x | 8.47x | 9.54x | 9.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.25x | 8.01x | 13.58x | 10.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.82x | 6.02x | 7.81x | 7.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.34x | 0.81x | 0.87x | 0.75x | 0.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.54x | 1.48x | 1.32x | 2.30x | 2.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.88x | 12.27x | 12.43x | 12.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SKYW and DAL each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UAL delivers a 24.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-89 for ULCC. SKYW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.87x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ULCC's 11.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SKYW scores 8/9 vs ULCC's 0/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -88.6% | +6.4% | +16.0% | +24.1% | +24.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.3% | +2.5% | +5.9% | +6.2% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.3% | +6.9% | +9.2% | +12.0% | +9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.2% | +8.3% | +10.8% | +11.4% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 0 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 11.13x | 0.95x | 0.87x | 1.02x | 2.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.8B | $447M | $2.4B | $16.8B | $25.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $671M | $145M | — | $4.3B | $5.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.5B | $592M | $2.4B | $21.1B | $31.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -29.29x | 1.12x | 9.88x | 9.69x | 4.61x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SKYW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UAL five years ago would be worth $18,217 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,633 for ULCC. Over the past 12 months, DAL leads with a +63.0% total return vs SKYW's -9.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SKYW at 47.4% vs ULCC's -12.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.8% | +16.4% | -13.4% | +6.1% | -11.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +55.6% | +50.4% | -9.6% | +63.0% | +32.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.0% | -6.6% | +220.4% | +118.3% | +117.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.7% | -58.7% | +76.9% | +61.9% | +82.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.2% | -53.7% | +282.0% | +87.4% | +118.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.5% | -2.3% | +47.4% | +29.7% | +29.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SKYW and DAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SKYW is the less volatile stock with a 1.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ULCC's 2.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAL currently trades 95.7% from its 52-week high vs SKYW's 70.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.84x | 2.04x | 1.49x | 1.93x | 2.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.66 | $22.29 | $123.94 | $76.39 | $119.21 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.02 | $10.14 | $80.00 | $44.78 | $71.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.5% | +75.6% | +70.7% | +95.7% | +83.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.4 | 49.4 | 47.8 | 64.2 | 58.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.8M | 741K | 379K | 12.2M | 8.3M |
Analyst Outlook
DAL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ULCC as "Hold", SNCY as "Buy", SKYW as "Buy", DAL as "Buy", UAL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.2% upside for SKYW (target: $122) vs 12.8% for DAL (target: $82). DAL is the only dividend payer here at 0.92% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.67 | $21.00 | $122.00 | $82.45 | $136.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 11 | 17 | 44 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.67 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.2% | +2.4% | 0.0% | +2.0% |
SKYW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). DAL leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
ULCC vs SNCY vs SKYW vs DAL vs UAL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ULCC or SNCY or SKYW or DAL or UAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) is the stronger pick with 15. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. (ULCC). SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sun Country Airlines Holdings, Inc. (SNCY) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ULCC or SNCY or SKYW or DAL or UAL?
On trailing P/E, SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus Sun Country Airlines Holdings, Inc. at 17. 6x. On forward P/E, SkyWest, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ULCC or SNCY or SKYW or DAL or UAL?
Over the past 5 years, United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
(UAL) delivered a total return of +82. 2%, compared to -73. 7% for Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. (ULCC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKYW returned +282. 0% versus ULCC's -71. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ULCC or SNCY or SKYW or DAL or UAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 49β versus Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 84β — meaning ULCC is approximately 91% more volatile than SKYW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 87% versus 11% for Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ULCC or SNCY or SKYW or DAL or UAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) is pulling ahead at 15. 0% versus -1. 4% for Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. (ULCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Delta Air Lines, Inc. grew EPS 43. 7% year-over-year, compared to -257. 9% for Frontier Group Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SKYW leads at 10. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ULCC or SNCY or SKYW or DAL or UAL?
SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 6% net margin versus -3. 7% for Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SKYW leads at 15. 2% versus -4. 0% for ULCC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SNCY leads at 66. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ULCC or SNCY or SKYW or DAL or UAL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 18. 2x for Sun Country Airlines Holdings, Inc. — 10. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKYW: 39. 2% to $122. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ULCC or SNCY or SKYW or DAL or UAL?
In this comparison, DAL (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. ULCC, SNCY, SKYW, UAL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ULCC or SNCY or SKYW or DAL or UAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+282. 0% 10Y return). Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. (ULCC) carries a higher beta of 2. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SKYW: +282. 0%, ULCC: -71. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ULCC and SNCY and SKYW and DAL and UAL?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ULCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SNCY is a small-cap deep-value stock; SKYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; DAL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; UAL is a mid-cap deep-value stock. DAL pays a dividend while ULCC, SNCY, SKYW, UAL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.