Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ULS vs BURL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
ULS vs BURL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $21.05B | $19.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.11B | $11.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $349M | $610M |
| Gross Margin | 49.6% | 41.9% |
| Operating Margin | 17.8% | 8.9% |
| Forward P/E | 48.0x | 32.0x |
| Total Debt | $832M | $3.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $295M | $1.23B |
ULS vs BURL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| UL Solutions Inc. (ULS) | 100 | 298.4 | +198.4% |
| Burlington Stores, … (BURL) | 100 | 173.8 | +73.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ULS vs BURL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ULS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 0.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 64.3%, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 0.73, yield 0.5%, current ratio 1.32x
BURL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.9%, EPS growth 21.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.0%
- 462.2% 10Y total return vs ULS's 202.7%
- 8.9% revenue growth vs ULS's 6.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.9% revenue growth vs ULS's 6.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (32.0x vs 48.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.2% margin vs BURL's 5.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs BURL's 1.30, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +75.6% vs BURL's +31.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.9% ROA vs BURL's 6.5%, ROIC 23.1% vs 10.3% |
ULS vs BURL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ULS vs BURL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ULS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BURL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 3.7x ULS's $3.1B. ULS is the more profitable business, keeping 11.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BURL's 5.3%. On growth, BURL holds the edge at +11.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.1B | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $742M | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $349M | $610M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $450M | $232M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.6% | +41.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.8% | +8.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +5.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.5% | +2.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.5% | +11.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.4% | +20.4% |
Valuation Metrics
BURL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 32.9x trailing earnings, BURL trades at a 50% valuation discount to ULS's 65.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BURL's 17.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ULS's 28.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21.1B | $19.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21.6B | $22.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 65.46x | 32.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 47.96x | 31.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 9.85x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.48x | 17.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.90x | 1.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 16.43x | 5.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 52.24x | 115.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ULS leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BURL delivers a 29.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $28 for ULS. ULS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.64x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BURL's 1.03x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +28.1% | +29.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.9% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +23.1% | +10.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +24.8% | +12.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.64x | 1.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $537M | $2.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $295M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $832M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 18.89x | 11.36x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ULS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ULS five years ago would be worth $30,275 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,572 for BURL. Over the past 12 months, ULS leads with a +75.6% total return vs BURL's +31.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ULS at 44.7% vs BURL's 19.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +29.6% | +4.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +75.6% | +31.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +202.7% | +70.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +202.7% | -4.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +202.7% | +462.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +44.7% | +19.4% |
Risk & Volatility
ULS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ULS is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BURL's 1.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ULS currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs BURL's 88.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.73x | 1.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $104.79 | $351.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $59.40 | $218.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +88.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.5 | 38.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 685K | 720K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ULS as "Buy" and BURL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.1% upside for BURL (target: $332) vs -14.6% for ULS (target: $89). ULS is the only dividend payer here at 0.49% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $89.40 | $331.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.51 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% |
ULS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BURL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
ULS vs BURL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ULS or BURL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Burlington Stores, Inc.
(BURL) is the stronger pick with 8. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for UL Solutions Inc. (ULS). Burlington Stores, Inc. (BURL) offers the better valuation at 32. 9x trailing P/E (32. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UL Solutions Inc. (ULS) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ULS or BURL?
On trailing P/E, Burlington Stores, Inc.
(BURL) is the cheapest at 32. 9x versus UL Solutions Inc. at 65. 5x. On forward P/E, Burlington Stores, Inc. is actually cheaper at 32. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ULS or BURL?
Over the past 5 years, UL Solutions Inc.
(ULS) delivered a total return of +202. 7%, compared to -4. 3% for Burlington Stores, Inc. (BURL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BURL returned +462. 2% versus ULS's +202. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ULS or BURL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), UL Solutions Inc.
(ULS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Burlington Stores, Inc. 's 1. 30β — meaning BURL is approximately 79% more volatile than ULS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, UL Solutions Inc. (ULS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 64% versus 103% for Burlington Stores, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ULS or BURL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Burlington Stores, Inc.
(BURL) is pulling ahead at 8. 9% versus 6. 4% for UL Solutions Inc. (ULS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Burlington Stores, Inc. grew EPS 21. 9% year-over-year, compared to -1. 2% for UL Solutions Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BURL leads at 10. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ULS or BURL?
UL Solutions Inc.
(ULS) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 6% net margin versus 5. 3% for Burlington Stores, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ULS leads at 17. 1% versus 7. 3% for BURL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ULS leads at 49. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ULS or BURL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Burlington Stores, Inc.
(BURL) trades at 32. 0x forward P/E versus 48. 0x for UL Solutions Inc. — 16. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BURL: 6. 1% to $331. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — ULS or BURL?
In this comparison, ULS (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. BURL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ULS or BURL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, UL Solutions Inc.
(ULS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), +202. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ULS: +202. 7%, BURL: +462. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ULS and BURL?
These companies operate in different sectors (ULS (Industrials) and BURL (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.