ULS vs ICFI vs CACI vs SAIC vs LDOS

For growth investors, CACI International Inc (CACI) is the stronger pick with 12.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 3% for ICF International, Inc. (ICFI). Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (11. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UL Solutions Inc. (ULS) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Leidos Holdings, Inc.

(LDOS) is the cheapest at 11. 7x versus UL Solutions Inc. at 62. 8x. On forward P/E, Science Applications International Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Leidos Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 53x versus UL Solutions Inc. 's 6. 57x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, UL Solutions Inc.

(ULS) delivered a total return of +190. 4%, compared to -21. 6% for ICF International, Inc. (ICFI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CACI returned +406. 9% versus ICFI's +88. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

27β versus UL Solutions Inc. 's 0. 87β — meaning ULS is approximately 219% more volatile than SAIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 119% for Leidos Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CACI International Inc (CACI) is pulling ahead at 12.

6% versus -7. 3% for ICF International, Inc. (ICFI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Leidos Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 20. 7% year-over-year, compared to -14. 9% for ICF International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CACI leads at 11. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

UL Solutions Inc.

(ULS) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 6% net margin versus 4. 9% for ICF International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ULS leads at 17. 1% versus 7. 1% for SAIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ULS leads at 49. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 53x versus UL Solutions Inc. 's 6. 57x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) trades at 9. 3x forward P/E versus 43. 7x for UL Solutions Inc. — 34. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LDOS: 54. 3% to $200. 80.

In this comparison, SAIC (1.

6% yield), LDOS (1. 2% yield), ICFI (0. 8% yield), ULS (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. CACI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

27), 1. 6% yield, +104. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SAIC: +104. 0%, ULS: +190. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (ULS (Industrials) and ICFI (Industrials) and CACI (Technology) and SAIC (Technology) and LDOS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ULS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ICFI is a small-cap deep-value stock; CACI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SAIC is a small-cap deep-value stock; LDOS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. ULS, ICFI, SAIC, LDOS pay a dividend while CACI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.