REIT - Residential
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
UMH vs PATK vs SKY vs CVCO vs SUI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Residential Construction
Residential Construction
REIT - Residential
UMH vs PATK vs SKY vs CVCO vs SUI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Residential | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Residential Construction | Residential Construction | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $1.35B | $3.17B | $4.05B | $4.57B | $15.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $201M | $3.94B | $2.64B | $2.20B | $2.32B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $22M | $136M | $214M | $269M | $1.55B |
| Gross Margin | 37.2% | 22.5% | 26.3% | 23.4% | 51.9% |
| Operating Margin | 18.0% | 7.0% | 9.8% | 9.8% | 24.0% |
| Forward P/E | 114.6x | 19.5x | 19.3x | 20.3x | 48.5x |
| Total Debt | $761M | $1.64B | $131M | $45M | $1.83B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $72M | $26M | $610M | $356M | $636M |
UMH vs PATK vs SKY vs CVCO vs SUI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH) | 100 | 126.8 | +26.8% |
| Patrick Industries,… (PATK) | 100 | 275.2 | +175.2% |
| Champion Homes, Inc. (SKY) | 100 | 293.2 | +193.2% |
| Cavco Industries, I… (CVCO) | 100 | 254.8 | +154.8% |
| Sun Communities, In… (SUI) | 100 | 91.8 | -8.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UMH vs PATK vs SKY vs CVCO vs SUI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UMH is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.36, Low D/E 83.9%, current ratio 12.28x
- Beta 0.36, yield 5.2%, current ratio 12.28x
PATK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +19.6% vs SKY's -16.3%
SKY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 22.7%, EPS growth 35.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.0%
- 7.1% 10Y total return vs CVCO's 448.0%
- PEG 0.71 vs CVCO's 0.98
- 22.7% revenue growth vs SUI's -27.9%
CVCO is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 18.2% ROA vs UMH's 1.7%, ROIC 19.4% vs 2.3%
SUI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.26, yield 6.6%
- 66.9% margin vs PATK's 3.5%
- Beta 0.26 vs CVCO's 1.20
- 6.6% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs UMH's 5.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.7% revenue growth vs SUI's -27.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.3x vs 48.5x), PEG 0.71 vs 0.93 | |
| Quality / Margins | 66.9% margin vs PATK's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.26 vs CVCO's 1.20 | |
| Dividends | 6.6% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs UMH's 5.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.6% vs SKY's -16.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.2% ROA vs UMH's 1.7%, ROIC 19.4% vs 2.3% |
UMH vs PATK vs SKY vs CVCO vs SUI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
UMH vs PATK vs SKY vs CVCO vs SUI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SUI leads in 3 of 6 categories
PATK leads 2 • CVCO leads 1 • UMH leads 0 • SKY leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SUI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PATK is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.9B annually — 19.7x UMH's $201M. SUI is the more profitable business, keeping 66.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PATK's 3.5%. On growth, CVCO holds the edge at +11.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $201M | $3.9B | $2.6B | $2.2B | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $86M | $445M | $306M | $221M | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $22M | $136M | $214M | $269M | $1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $87M | $194M | $260M | $205M | $884M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.2% | +22.5% | +26.3% | +23.4% | +51.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +7.0% | +9.8% | +9.8% | +24.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +3.5% | +8.1% | +12.2% | +66.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +43.2% | +4.9% | +9.9% | +9.3% | +38.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -0.6% | +1.8% | +11.3% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -0.9% | -3.0% | -19.1% | +79.4% |
Valuation Metrics
PATK leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.6x trailing earnings, SUI trades at a 95% valuation discount to UMH's 226.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SUI offers better value at 0.22x vs CVCO's 1.13x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $3.2B | $4.1B | $4.6B | $15.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $4.8B | $3.6B | $4.3B | $16.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 226.86x | 24.45x | 21.43x | 23.29x | 11.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 114.64x | 19.47x | 19.32x | 20.34x | 48.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.78x | 1.13x | 0.22x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.22x | 10.72x | 12.69x | 20.32x | 16.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.17x | 0.80x | 1.63x | 2.27x | 6.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.50x | 2.79x | 2.76x | 3.74x | 2.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.51x | 12.86x | 21.29x | 29.09x | 17.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CVCO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CVCO delivers a 24.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $2 for UMH. CVCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PATK's 1.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SKY scores 7/9 vs SUI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.4% | +11.6% | +13.4% | +24.7% | +21.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +4.4% | +10.1% | +18.2% | +12.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | +7.6% | +16.9% | +19.4% | +3.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.8% | +10.2% | +14.8% | +17.4% | +4.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.84x | 1.39x | 0.08x | 0.04x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $689M | $1.6B | -$479M | -$311M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $72M | $26M | $610M | $356M | $636M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $761M | $1.6B | $131M | $45M | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.89x | 3.40x | 51.32x | 211.73x | 0.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PATK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CVCO five years ago would be worth $22,353 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,980 for SUI. Over the past 12 months, PATK leads with a +19.6% total return vs SKY's -16.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PATK at 31.7% vs SKY's -0.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.3% | -13.2% | -13.7% | -18.5% | +4.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.0% | +19.6% | -16.3% | -7.0% | +7.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.0% | +128.2% | -2.6% | +57.7% | +4.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.5% | +56.6% | +64.0% | +123.5% | -10.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +139.1% | +395.2% | +714.5% | +448.0% | +123.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.0% | +31.7% | -0.9% | +16.4% | +1.5% |
Risk & Volatility
SUI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SUI is the less volatile stock with a 0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVCO's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SUI currently trades 91.5% from its 52-week high vs PATK's 64.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.35x | 1.00x | 0.97x | 1.24x | 0.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.49 | $148.50 | $99.17 | $713.01 | $137.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.93 | $80.35 | $59.44 | $393.53 | $115.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.8% | +64.2% | +73.9% | +67.6% | +91.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.9 | 42.8 | 46.0 | 46.2 | 42.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 621K | 469K | 500K | 142K | 792K |
Analyst Outlook
SUI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UMH as "Buy", PATK as "Buy", SKY as "Buy", CVCO as "Buy", SUI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.7% upside for SKY (target: $106) vs -1.5% for CVCO (target: $475). For income investors, SUI offers the higher dividend yield at 6.63% vs PATK's 1.67%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.50 | $124.50 | $106.00 | $475.00 | $140.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 17 | 8 | 2 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.2% | +1.7% | — | — | +6.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 1 | 1 | — | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.83 | $1.60 | — | — | $8.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +1.0% | +2.0% | +3.3% | +3.5% |
SUI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). PATK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
UMH vs PATK vs SKY vs CVCO vs SUI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UMH or PATK or SKY or CVCO or SUI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Champion Homes, Inc.
(SKY) is the stronger pick with 22. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -27. 9% for Sun Communities, Inc. (SUI). Sun Communities, Inc. (SUI) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (48. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UMH or PATK or SKY or CVCO or SUI?
On trailing P/E, Sun Communities, Inc.
(SUI) is the cheapest at 11. 6x versus UMH Properties, Inc. at 226. 9x. On forward P/E, Champion Homes, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Champion Homes, Inc. wins at 0. 71x versus Cavco Industries, Inc. 's 0. 98x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UMH or PATK or SKY or CVCO or SUI?
Over the past 5 years, Cavco Industries, Inc.
(CVCO) delivered a total return of +123. 5%, compared to -10. 2% for Sun Communities, Inc. (SUI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKY returned +709. 7% versus SUI's +123. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UMH or PATK or SKY or CVCO or SUI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sun Communities, Inc.
(SUI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 23β versus Cavco Industries, Inc. 's 1. 24β — meaning CVCO is approximately 447% more volatile than SUI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cavco Industries, Inc. (CVCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 139% for Patrick Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UMH or PATK or SKY or CVCO or SUI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Champion Homes, Inc.
(SKY) is pulling ahead at 22. 7% versus -27. 9% for Sun Communities, Inc. (SUI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sun Communities, Inc. grew EPS 1427% year-over-year, compared to -5. 1% for Patrick Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UMH leads at 10. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UMH or PATK or SKY or CVCO or SUI?
Sun Communities, Inc.
(SUI) is the more profitable company, earning 59. 6% net margin versus 3. 4% for Patrick Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 59. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SUI leads at 20. 9% versus 7. 0% for PATK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SKY leads at 26. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UMH or PATK or SKY or CVCO or SUI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Champion Homes, Inc. (SKY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 71x versus Cavco Industries, Inc. 's 0. 98x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Champion Homes, Inc. (SKY) trades at 19. 3x forward P/E versus 114. 6x for UMH Properties, Inc. — 95. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKY: 44. 7% to $106. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — UMH or PATK or SKY or CVCO or SUI?
In this comparison, SUI (6.
6% yield), UMH (5. 2% yield), PATK (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. SKY, CVCO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UMH or PATK or SKY or CVCO or SUI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sun Communities, Inc.
(SUI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 23), 6. 6% yield, +123. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SUI: +123. 2%, CVCO: +450. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UMH and PATK and SKY and CVCO and SUI?
These companies operate in different sectors (UMH (Real Estate) and PATK (Consumer Cyclical) and SKY (Consumer Cyclical) and CVCO (Consumer Cyclical) and SUI (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UMH is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PATK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SKY is a small-cap high-growth stock; CVCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SUI is a mid-cap deep-value stock. UMH, PATK, SUI pay a dividend while SKY, CVCO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.