REIT - Residential
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
UMH vs WELL vs VTR vs SUI vs EQR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
UMH vs WELL vs VTR vs SUI vs EQR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Residential | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $1.35B | $149.25B | $41.15B | $15.54B | $24.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $201M | $11.63B | $6.13B | $2.32B | $3.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $22M | $1.43B | $260M | $1.55B | $954M |
| Gross Margin | 37.2% | 39.1% | -4.3% | 51.9% | 46.3% |
| Operating Margin | 18.0% | 4.4% | 13.4% | 24.0% | 28.5% |
| Forward P/E | 149.8x | 78.4x | 118.0x | 47.1x | 50.6x |
| Total Debt | $761M | $21.38B | $13.22B | $1.83B | $8.78B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $72M | $5.03B | $741M | $636M | $56M |
UMH vs WELL vs VTR vs SUI vs EQR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH) | 100 | 127.2 | +27.2% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 420.4 | +320.4% |
| Ventas, Inc. (VTR) | 100 | 247.6 | +147.6% |
| Sun Communities, In… (SUI) | 100 | 91.9 | -8.1% |
| Equity Residential (EQR) | 100 | 108.8 | +8.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UMH vs WELL vs VTR vs SUI vs EQR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UMH is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.36, yield 5.2%, current ratio 12.28x
WELL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 223.1% 10Y total return vs UMH's 139.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
- 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs SUI's -27.9%
- +42.7% vs UMH's -3.0%
VTR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 184.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.2%
- Beta 0.01 vs EQR's 0.38
SUI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.26, yield 6.6%
- PEG 0.91 vs EQR's 9.94
- Lower P/E (47.1x vs 50.6x), PEG 0.91 vs 9.94
- 66.9% margin vs VTR's 4.2%
Among these 5 stocks, EQR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs SUI's -27.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (47.1x vs 50.6x), PEG 0.91 vs 9.94 | |
| Quality / Margins | 66.9% margin vs VTR's 4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs EQR's 0.38 | |
| Dividends | 6.6% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs UMH's 5.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.7% vs UMH's -3.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.2% ROA vs VTR's 1.0%, ROIC 3.2% vs 2.5% |
UMH vs WELL vs VTR vs SUI vs EQR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
UMH vs WELL vs VTR vs SUI vs EQR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SUI leads in 2 of 6 categories
WELL leads 1 • VTR leads 1 • UMH leads 0 • EQR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SUI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 58.0x UMH's $201M. SUI is the more profitable business, keeping 66.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VTR's 4.2%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $201M | $11.6B | $6.1B | $2.3B | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $86M | $2.8B | $2.3B | $1.1B | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $22M | $1.4B | $260M | $1.6B | $954M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $87M | $2.5B | $1.4B | $884M | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.2% | +39.1% | -4.3% | +51.9% | +46.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +4.4% | +13.4% | +24.0% | +28.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +12.3% | +4.2% | +66.9% | +30.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +43.2% | +21.9% | +22.4% | +38.0% | +42.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +40.3% | +22.0% | +8.4% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +22.5% | 0.0% | +79.4% | -64.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — UMH and SUI each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.6x trailing earnings, SUI trades at a 95% valuation discount to UMH's 226.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SUI offers better value at 0.22x vs EQR's 4.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $149.2B | $41.1B | $15.5B | $24.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $165.6B | $53.6B | $16.7B | $33.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 226.86x | 153.25x | 160.26x | 11.63x | 22.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 149.81x | 78.42x | 118.01x | 47.12x | 50.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.22x | 4.44x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.22x | 66.40x | 24.31x | 16.90x | 15.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.17x | 13.99x | 7.05x | 6.74x | 7.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.50x | 3.35x | 3.18x | 2.19x | 2.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.51x | 52.41x | 31.25x | 17.98x | 19.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SUI and EQR each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SUI delivers a 21.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $2 for VTR. SUI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VTR's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs EQR's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.4% | +3.5% | +2.1% | +21.6% | +8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | +2.3% | +1.0% | +12.2% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | +0.5% | +2.5% | +3.2% | +4.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.8% | +0.6% | +3.2% | +4.0% | +5.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.84x | 0.49x | 1.05x | 0.25x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $689M | $16.3B | $12.5B | $1.2B | $8.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $72M | $5.0B | $741M | $636M | $56M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $761M | $21.4B | $13.2B | $1.8B | $8.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.89x | 0.26x | 1.40x | 0.78x | 5.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $30,234 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,980 for SUI. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +42.7% total return vs UMH's -3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 42.5% vs SUI's 1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.3% | +14.3% | +12.6% | +4.1% | +8.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.0% | +42.7% | +33.9% | +7.8% | -2.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.0% | +189.5% | +94.2% | +4.5% | +17.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.5% | +202.3% | +74.8% | -10.2% | +6.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +139.1% | +223.1% | +65.0% | +123.4% | +29.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.0% | +42.5% | +24.8% | +1.5% | +5.5% |
Risk & Volatility
VTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VTR is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EQR's 0.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VTR currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs UMH's 90.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.36x | 0.13x | 0.01x | 0.26x | 0.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.49 | $219.59 | $88.50 | $137.85 | $71.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.93 | $142.65 | $61.76 | $115.53 | $57.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.8% | +97.0% | +97.8% | +91.5% | +91.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.9 | 60.2 | 56.2 | 42.2 | 69.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 621K | 2.6M | 3.4M | 792K | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
SUI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UMH as "Buy", WELL as "Buy", VTR as "Buy", SUI as "Buy", EQR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.3% upside for SUI (target: $140) vs 3.9% for UMH (target: $17). For income investors, SUI offers the higher dividend yield at 6.63% vs WELL's 1.30%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.50 | $226.50 | $90.80 | $140.29 | $70.15 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 34 | 32 | 20 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.2% | +1.3% | +2.1% | +6.6% | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.83 | $2.76 | $1.86 | $8.36 | $2.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.5% | +1.1% |
SUI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). WELL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
UMH vs WELL vs VTR vs SUI vs EQR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UMH or WELL or VTR or SUI or EQR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -27. 9% for Sun Communities, Inc. (SUI). Sun Communities, Inc. (SUI) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (47. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UMH or WELL or VTR or SUI or EQR?
On trailing P/E, Sun Communities, Inc.
(SUI) is the cheapest at 11. 6x versus UMH Properties, Inc. at 226. 9x. On forward P/E, Sun Communities, Inc. is actually cheaper at 47. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sun Communities, Inc. wins at 0. 91x versus Equity Residential's 9. 94x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UMH or WELL or VTR or SUI or EQR?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +202. 3%, compared to -10. 2% for Sun Communities, Inc. (SUI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +223. 1% versus EQR's +29. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UMH or WELL or VTR or SUI or EQR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Equity Residential's 0. 38β — meaning EQR is approximately 3861% more volatile than VTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sun Communities, Inc. (SUI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 105% for Ventas, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UMH or WELL or VTR or SUI or EQR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus -27. 9% for Sun Communities, Inc. (SUI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sun Communities, Inc. grew EPS 1427% year-over-year, compared to -11. 5% for Welltower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UMH or WELL or VTR or SUI or EQR?
Sun Communities, Inc.
(SUI) is the more profitable company, earning 59. 6% net margin versus 4. 3% for Ventas, Inc. — meaning it keeps 59. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EQR leads at 36. 3% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EQR leads at 46. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UMH or WELL or VTR or SUI or EQR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sun Communities, Inc. (SUI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 91x versus Equity Residential's 9. 94x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Sun Communities, Inc. (SUI) trades at 47. 1x forward P/E versus 149. 8x for UMH Properties, Inc. — 102. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SUI: 11. 3% to $140. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — UMH or WELL or VTR or SUI or EQR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Sun Communities, Inc. (SUI) offers the highest yield at 6. 6%, versus 1. 3% for Welltower Inc. (WELL).
09Is UMH or WELL or VTR or SUI or EQR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 2. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VTR: +65. 0%, EQR: +29. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UMH and WELL and VTR and SUI and EQR?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: UMH is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VTR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SUI is a mid-cap deep-value stock; EQR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.