Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
UP vs FLYW vs SOAR vs AIRO vs UAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Aerospace & Defense
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
UP vs FLYW vs SOAR vs AIRO vs UAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Information Technology Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Aerospace & Defense | Airlines, Airports & Air Services |
| Market Cap | $218M | $2.09B | $468K | $233M | $32.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $736M | $188.60B | $52M | $101M | $60.47B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-294M | $12.54B | $9M | $-7.96B | $3.67B |
| Gross Margin | 2.2% | 0.2% | 17.2% | 44.6% | 64.2% |
| Operating Margin | -34.3% | 5.7% | -4.0% | -188.5% | 8.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 48.9x | — | — | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $157M | $0.00 | $33M | $49M | $31.04B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $134M | $330M | $2M | $21M | $5.94B |
UP vs FLYW vs SOAR vs AIRO vs UAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheels Up Experienc… (UP) | 100 | 28.1 | -71.9% |
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 149.7 | +49.7% |
| Volato Group, Inc. (SOAR) | 100 | 19.7 | -80.3% |
| AIRO Group Holdings… (AIRO) | 100 | 30.9 | -69.1% |
| United Airlines Hol… (UAL) | 100 | 125.6 | +25.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UP vs FLYW vs SOAR vs AIRO vs UAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, UP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FLYW has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.32
- Lower volatility, beta 1.32, current ratio 1.50x
- Beta 1.32, current ratio 1.50x
- Beta 1.32 vs AIRO's 2.70
SOAR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 30.1%, EPS growth 43.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 252.6%
- 17.8% margin vs AIRO's -125.1%
- 68.4% ROA vs AIRO's -10.3%, ROIC -31.5% vs -2.2%
AIRO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 101.0% revenue growth vs UP's -7.0%
UAL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 118.9% 10Y total return vs FLYW's -50.1%
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 101.0% revenue growth vs UP's -7.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.8% margin vs AIRO's -125.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.32 vs AIRO's 2.70 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +74.4% vs SOAR's -89.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 68.4% ROA vs AIRO's -10.3%, ROIC -31.5% vs -2.2% |
UP vs FLYW vs SOAR vs AIRO vs UAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
UP vs FLYW vs SOAR vs AIRO vs UAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UAL leads in 3 of 6 categories
AIRO leads 1 • FLYW leads 1 • UP leads 0 • SOAR leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UAL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 3617.1x SOAR's $52M. SOAR is the more profitable business, keeping 17.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AIRO's -125.1%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $736M | $188.6B | $52M | $101M | $60.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$191M | $10.8B | -$2M | -$8.8B | $8.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$294M | $12.5B | $9M | -$8.0B | $3.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$270M | -$15.8B | -$8M | -$15M | $3.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +2.2% | +0.2% | +17.2% | +44.6% | +64.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -34.3% | +5.7% | -4.0% | -188.5% | +8.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -39.9% | +6.6% | +17.8% | -125.1% | +6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -36.7% | -8.4% | -15.8% | -0.2% | +5.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.2% | +1408.6% | -99.1% | — | +10.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +69.2% | +4.0% | +131.8% | — | +84.5% |
Valuation Metrics
AIRO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, UAL trades at a 94% valuation discount to FLYW's 159.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UAL's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FLYW's 47.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $218M | $2.1B | $468,338 | $233M | $32.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $241M | $1.8B | $31M | $261M | $57.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.72x | 159.18x | -0.01x | -4.79x | 9.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 48.88x | — | — | 10.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 47.10x | — | — | 7.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.30x | 3.35x | 0.01x | 2.68x | 0.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.68x | — | 0.34x | 2.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.14x | — | 11.24x | 12.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UAL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SOAR delivers a 2.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-11 for AIRO. AIRO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UAL's 2.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UAL scores 8/9 vs UP's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +5.9% | +2.3% | -10.8% | +24.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -29.1% | +4.3% | +68.4% | -10.3% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +2.1% | -31.5% | -2.2% | +9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -167.1% | +1.3% | -2.3% | -2.8% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | — | 0.09x | 2.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $23M | -$330M | $31M | $28M | $25.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $134M | $330M | $2M | $21M | $5.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $157M | $0 | $33M | $49M | $31.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.21x | 1.84x | -0.23x | -94.75x | 4.61x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UAL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UAL five years ago would be worth $18,856 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10 for SOAR. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +74.4% total return vs SOAR's -89.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UAL at 29.7% vs SOAR's -90.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -54.3% | +26.0% | -62.1% | -19.6% | -11.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -71.7% | +74.4% | -89.5% | -69.0% | +36.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.9% | -40.9% | -99.9% | -69.0% | +118.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -50.1% | -99.9% | -69.0% | +88.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -50.1% | -99.9% | -69.0% | +118.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -60.7% | -16.1% | -90.1% | -32.4% | +29.7% |
Risk & Volatility
FLYW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FLYW is the less volatile stock with a 1.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AIRO's 2.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs SOAR's 5.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.50x | 1.32x | 2.30x | 2.70x | 2.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.00 | $17.79 | $4.36 | $39.07 | $119.21 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.75 | $9.69 | $0.19 | $6.90 | $71.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +8.6% | +98.4% | +5.8% | +19.0% | +83.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.4 | 68.7 | 51.3 | 36.1 | 50.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 130K | 2.0M | 6.2M | 543K | 8.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UP as "Hold", FLYW as "Buy", AIRO as "Buy", UAL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8219.5% upside for UP (target: $500) vs -0.1% for FLYW (target: $18).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $500.00 | $17.50 | — | $19.67 | $136.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 19 | — | 3 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +3.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.0% |
UAL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AIRO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
UP vs FLYW vs SOAR vs AIRO vs UAL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UP or FLYW or SOAR or AIRO or UAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AIRO Group Holdings, Inc.
Common Stock (AIRO) is the stronger pick with 101. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 0% for Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP). United Airlines Holdings, Inc. (UAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flywire Corporation (FLYW) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UP or FLYW or SOAR or AIRO or UAL?
On trailing P/E, United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
(UAL) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus Flywire Corporation at 159. 2x. On forward P/E, United Airlines Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UP or FLYW or SOAR or AIRO or UAL?
Over the past 5 years, United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
(UAL) delivered a total return of +88. 6%, compared to -99. 9% for Volato Group, Inc. (SOAR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UAL returned +118. 9% versus SOAR's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UP or FLYW or SOAR or AIRO or UAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
32β versus AIRO Group Holdings, Inc. Common Stock's 2. 70β — meaning AIRO is approximately 105% more volatile than FLYW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AIRO Group Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (AIRO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 2% for United Airlines Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UP or FLYW or SOAR or AIRO or UAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AIRO Group Holdings, Inc.
Common Stock (AIRO) is pulling ahead at 101. 0% versus -7. 0% for Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to -19. 2% for AIRO Group Holdings, Inc. Common Stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, SOAR leads at 252. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UP or FLYW or SOAR or AIRO or UAL?
United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
(UAL) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 7% net margin versus -87. 8% for Volato Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UAL leads at 8. 0% versus -34. 3% for UP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AIRO leads at 67. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UP or FLYW or SOAR or AIRO or UAL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
(UAL) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 48. 9x for Flywire Corporation — 38. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UP: 8219. 5% to $500. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — UP or FLYW or SOAR or AIRO or UAL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is UP or FLYW or SOAR or AIRO or UAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Flywire Corporation (FLYW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Volato Group, Inc. (SOAR) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLYW: -50. 1%, SOAR: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UP and FLYW and SOAR and AIRO and UAL?
These companies operate in different sectors (UP (Industrials) and FLYW (Technology) and SOAR (Industrials) and AIRO (Industrials) and UAL (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; SOAR is a small-cap high-growth stock; AIRO is a small-cap high-growth stock; UAL is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.