Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
UPBD vs WHR vs MHK vs PRAA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Financial - Credit Services
UPBD vs WHR vs MHK vs PRAA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $1.09B | $3.11B | $6.29B | $803M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.74B | $15.18B | $10.99B | $1.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $84M | $246M | $414M | $-305M |
| Gross Margin | 45.2% | 14.4% | 24.3% | 99.2% |
| Operating Margin | 5.0% | 3.9% | 4.9% | 33.9% |
| Forward P/E | 4.5x | 9.5x | 11.2x | 25.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.86B | $7.86B | $2.76B | $32M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $121M | $669M | $856M | $104M |
UPBD vs WHR vs MHK vs PRAA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD) | 100 | 73.7 | -26.3% |
| Whirlpool Corporati… (WHR) | 100 | 39.6 | -60.4% |
| Mohawk Industries, … (MHK) | 100 | 110.2 | +10.2% |
| PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) | 100 | 61.2 | -38.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UPBD vs WHR vs MHK vs PRAA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UPBD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.7%, EPS growth -43.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.4%
- Lower P/E (4.5x vs 25.9x)
- 8.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WHR's 11.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
WHR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.27, yield 11.0%
- Beta 1.27, yield 11.0%, current ratio 0.76x
- Beta 1.27 vs UPBD's 1.89
MHK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.34, Low D/E 33.0%, current ratio 2.19x
- 3.8% margin vs PRAA's -24.6%
- 3.0% ROA vs PRAA's -5.9%, ROIC 3.9% vs 11.2%
PRAA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -32.2% 10Y total return vs UPBD's 104.3%
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs WHR's -6.5%
- +57.2% vs WHR's -31.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs WHR's -6.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.5x vs 25.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.8% margin vs PRAA's -24.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.27 vs UPBD's 1.89 | |
| Dividends | 8.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WHR's 11.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.2% vs WHR's -31.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.0% ROA vs PRAA's -5.9%, ROIC 3.9% vs 11.2% |
UPBD vs WHR vs MHK vs PRAA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UPBD vs WHR vs MHK vs PRAA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRAA leads in 3 of 6 categories
UPBD leads 0 • WHR leads 0 • MHK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRAA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WHR is the larger business by revenue, generating $15.2B annually — 12.2x PRAA's $1.2B. MHK is the more profitable business, keeping 3.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRAA's -24.6%. On growth, MHK holds the edge at +8.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $15.2B | $11.0B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.0B | $847M | $1.2B | $431M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $84M | $246M | $414M | -$305M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $349M | -$10M | $709M | -$90M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.2% | +14.4% | +24.3% | +99.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +3.9% | +4.9% | +33.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +1.6% | +3.8% | -24.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | -0.1% | +6.5% | -7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.7% | -9.6% | +8.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +45.2% | -2.1% | +65.2% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — UPBD and PRAA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, WHR trades at a 51% valuation discount to MHK's 17.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRAA's 1.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than UPBD's 10.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $3.1B | $6.3B | $803M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $10.3B | $8.2B | $731M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.01x | 8.52x | 17.33x | -2.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.47x | 9.53x | 11.23x | 25.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.27x | 9.67x | 7.05x | 1.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.23x | 0.20x | 0.58x | 0.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.58x | 1.00x | 0.77x | 0.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.57x | 33.77x | 10.20x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRAA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UPBD delivers a 12.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-26 for PRAA. PRAA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WHR's 2.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MHK scores 6/9 vs UPBD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.1% | +8.4% | +5.0% | -26.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | +1.5% | +3.0% | -5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.3% | +5.8% | +3.9% | +11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.5% | +7.9% | +4.8% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.67x | 2.89x | 0.33x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | $7.2B | $1.9B | -$72M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $121M | $669M | $856M | $104M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $7.9B | $2.8B | $32M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.41x | 2.52x | 36.90x | 0.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRAA five years ago would be worth $5,317 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,147 for WHR. Over the past 12 months, PRAA leads with a +57.2% total return vs WHR's -31.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MHK at 0.9% vs WHR's -21.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.4% | -34.1% | -6.2% | +19.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.2% | -31.2% | +1.9% | +57.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.8% | -51.3% | +2.9% | -39.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.3% | -68.5% | -55.3% | -46.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.3% | -41.6% | -47.6% | -32.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.5% | -21.3% | +0.9% | -15.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WHR and PRAA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WHR is the less volatile stock with a 1.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UPBD's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAA currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs WHR's 43.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.89x | 1.27x | 1.34x | 1.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.03 | $111.96 | $143.13 | $22.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.82 | $44.87 | $93.60 | $10.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.9% | +43.1% | +71.8% | +92.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.8 | 45.5 | 50.6 | 61.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 849K | 2.8M | 1.1M | 449K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WHR and PRAA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UPBD as "Buy", WHR as "Hold", MHK as "Hold", PRAA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 111.5% upside for UPBD (target: $40) vs 24.5% for PRAA (target: $26). For income investors, WHR offers the higher dividend yield at 11.04% vs UPBD's 7.99%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $39.67 | $61.50 | $130.00 | $26.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 19 | 32 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +8.0% | +11.0% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.50 | $5.32 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.4% | +2.5% |
PRAA leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
UPBD vs WHR vs MHK vs PRAA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UPBD or WHR or MHK or PRAA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PRA Group, Inc.
(PRAA) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 5% for Whirlpool Corporation (WHR). Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UPBD or WHR or MHK or PRAA?
On trailing P/E, Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) is the cheapest at 8.
5x versus Mohawk Industries, Inc. at 17. 3x. On forward P/E, Upbound Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UPBD or WHR or MHK or PRAA?
Over the past 5 years, PRA Group, Inc.
(PRAA) delivered a total return of -46. 8%, compared to -68. 5% for Whirlpool Corporation (WHR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UPBD returned +104. 3% versus MHK's -47. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UPBD or WHR or MHK or PRAA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
27β versus Upbound Group, Inc. 's 1. 89β — meaning UPBD is approximately 49% more volatile than WHR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for Whirlpool Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UPBD or WHR or MHK or PRAA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PRA Group, Inc.
(PRAA) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -6. 5% for Whirlpool Corporation (WHR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Whirlpool Corporation grew EPS 196. 4% year-over-year, compared to -535. 2% for PRA Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UPBD leads at 3. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UPBD or WHR or MHK or PRAA?
Mohawk Industries, Inc.
(MHK) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 4% net margin versus -24. 6% for PRA Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRAA leads at 33. 9% versus 4. 7% for WHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRAA leads at 99. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UPBD or WHR or MHK or PRAA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Upbound Group, Inc.
(UPBD) trades at 4. 5x forward P/E versus 25. 9x for PRA Group, Inc. — 21. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UPBD: 111. 5% to $39. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — UPBD or WHR or MHK or PRAA?
In this comparison, WHR (11.
0% yield), UPBD (8. 0% yield) pay a dividend. MHK, PRAA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UPBD or WHR or MHK or PRAA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Whirlpool Corporation (WHR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
27), 11. 0% yield). PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WHR: -41. 6%, PRAA: -32. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UPBD and WHR and MHK and PRAA?
These companies operate in different sectors (UPBD (Technology) and WHR (Consumer Cyclical) and MHK (Consumer Cyclical) and PRAA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UPBD is a small-cap deep-value stock; WHR is a small-cap deep-value stock; MHK is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. UPBD, WHR pay a dividend while MHK, PRAA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.