Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
UPLD vs JAMF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
UPLD vs JAMF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $29M | $1.75B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $202M | $691M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $-41M |
| Gross Margin | 75.9% | 76.8% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | -5.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.4x |
| Total Debt | $235M | $370M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $225M |
UPLD vs JAMF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upland Software, In… (UPLD) | 100 | 2.8 | -97.2% |
| Jamf Holding Corp. (JAMF) | 100 | 32.1 | -67.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UPLD vs JAMF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UPLD is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
JAMF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.16
- Rev growth 11.9%, EPS growth 39.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.6%
- -64.8% 10Y total return vs UPLD's -86.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.9% revenue growth vs UPLD's -21.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -6.0% margin vs UPLD's -7.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.16 vs UPLD's 1.88, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.5% vs UPLD's -58.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.9% ROA vs UPLD's -3.4%, ROIC -6.0% vs 4.0% |
UPLD vs JAMF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UPLD vs JAMF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JAMF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JAMF is the larger business by revenue, generating $691M annually — 3.4x UPLD's $202M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -6.0% (JAMF) to -7.1% (UPLD). On growth, JAMF holds the edge at +15.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $202M | $691M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $33M | $18M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | -$41M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $22M | $108M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.9% | +76.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | -5.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.1% | -6.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +15.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -23.5% | +15.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +90.7% | +68.6% |
Valuation Metrics
UPLD leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $29M | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $234M | $1.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.62x | -24.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.81x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 2.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.34x | 2.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.17x | 78.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JAMF leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JAMF delivers a -5.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-5 in annual profit, vs $-29 for UPLD. JAMF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.52x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPLD's 2.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JAMF scores 6/9 vs UPLD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -29.2% | -5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.4% | -1.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.0% | -6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.6% | -5.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.91x | 0.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $206M | $145M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $225M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $235M | $370M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.41x | -9.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JAMF leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JAMF five years ago would be worth $3,956 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $220 for UPLD. Over the past 12 months, JAMF leads with a +19.5% total return vs UPLD's -58.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JAMF at -9.9% vs UPLD's -34.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -35.2% | +0.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -58.5% | +19.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.6% | -27.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -60.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.1% | -64.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -34.3% | -9.9% |
Risk & Volatility
JAMF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JAMF is the less volatile stock with a 1.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UPLD's 1.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JAMF currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs UPLD's 24.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.88x | 1.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.91 | $13.06 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.50 | $7.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +24.9% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.5 | 66.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 393K | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $13.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +2.0% |
JAMF leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UPLD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
UPLD vs JAMF: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UPLD or JAMF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Jamf Holding Corp.
(JAMF) is the stronger pick with 11. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -21. 1% for Upland Software, Inc. (UPLD). Analysts rate Jamf Holding Corp. (JAMF) a "Hold" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — UPLD or JAMF?
Over the past 5 years, Jamf Holding Corp.
(JAMF) delivered a total return of -60. 4%, compared to -97. 8% for Upland Software, Inc. (UPLD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JAMF returned -64. 8% versus UPLD's -86. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — UPLD or JAMF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jamf Holding Corp.
(JAMF) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 16β versus Upland Software, Inc. 's 1. 88β — meaning UPLD is approximately 61% more volatile than JAMF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Jamf Holding Corp. (JAMF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 52% versus 3% for Upland Software, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — UPLD or JAMF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Jamf Holding Corp.
(JAMF) is pulling ahead at 11. 9% versus -21. 1% for Upland Software, Inc. (UPLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Upland Software, Inc. grew EPS 63. 4% year-over-year, compared to 39. 8% for Jamf Holding Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JAMF leads at 19. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — UPLD or JAMF?
Jamf Holding Corp.
(JAMF) is the more profitable company, earning -10. 9% net margin versus -17. 9% for Upland Software, Inc. — meaning it keeps -10. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UPLD leads at 7. 7% versus -11. 0% for JAMF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JAMF leads at 77. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — UPLD or JAMF?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is UPLD or JAMF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jamf Holding Corp.
(JAMF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 16)). Upland Software, Inc. (UPLD) carries a higher beta of 1. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JAMF: -64. 8%, UPLD: -86. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between UPLD and JAMF?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.