Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
UPWK vs FLNT vs GOOGL vs ACMR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Advertising Agencies
Internet Content & Information
Semiconductors
UPWK vs FLNT vs GOOGL vs ACMR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Advertising Agencies | Internet Content & Information | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $1.38B | $82M | $4.81T | $3.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $595M | $209M | $422.57B | $901M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $109M | $-27M | $160.21B | $94M |
| Gross Margin | 103.0% | 24.5% | 60.4% | 44.4% |
| Operating Margin | 20.7% | -9.7% | 32.7% | 12.1% |
| Forward P/E | 7.4x | — | 29.6x | 29.7x |
| Total Debt | $381M | $38M | $59.29B | $303M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $298M | $13M | $30.71B | $766M |
UPWK vs FLNT vs GOOGL vs ACMR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upwork Inc. (UPWK) | 100 | 85.3 | -14.7% |
| Fluent, Inc. (FLNT) | 100 | 23.1 | -76.9% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 555.2 | +455.2% |
| ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) | 100 | 297.0 | +197.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UPWK vs FLNT vs GOOGL vs ACMR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UPWK is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (7.4x vs 29.6x)
FLNT is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 1.14 vs ACMR's 3.24
GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.26, yield 0.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 14.3%, current ratio 2.01x
- Beta 1.26, yield 0.2%, current ratio 2.01x
- 37.9% margin vs FLNT's -13.0%
ACMR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth -10.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.3%
- 30.7% 10Y total return vs GOOGL's 10.0%
- PEG 0.84 vs GOOGL's 0.99
- 15.2% revenue growth vs FLNT's -18.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.2% revenue growth vs FLNT's -18.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.4x vs 29.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs FLNT's -13.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.14 vs ACMR's 3.24 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +195.6% vs UPWK's -34.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs FLNT's -34.3%, ROIC 25.1% vs -31.8% |
UPWK vs FLNT vs GOOGL vs ACMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UPWK vs FLNT vs GOOGL vs ACMR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOGL leads in 2 of 6 categories
UPWK leads 1 • ACMR leads 1 • FLNT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 2024.1x FLNT's $209M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FLNT's -13.0%. On growth, GOOGL holds the edge at +21.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $595M | $209M | $422.6B | $901M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $150M | -$11M | $161.3B | $126M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $109M | -$27M | $160.2B | $94M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $224M | -$5M | $73.3B | -$69M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +103.0% | +24.5% | +60.4% | +44.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | -9.7% | +32.7% | +12.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | -13.0% | +37.9% | +10.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +37.7% | -2.4% | +17.3% | -7.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -5.5% | +21.8% | +9.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.6% | +31.6% | +81.9% | -76.1% |
Valuation Metrics
UPWK leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.8x trailing earnings, UPWK trades at a 70% valuation discount to ACMR's 43.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ACMR offers better value at 1.22x vs GOOGL's 1.23x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $82M | $4.81T | $3.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $107M | $4.84T | $3.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.78x | -2.64x | 36.82x | 43.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.37x | — | 29.61x | 29.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.23x | 1.22x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.66x | — | 32.22x | 27.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.76x | 0.39x | 11.95x | 4.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.35x | 3.95x | 11.72x | 2.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.71x | — | 65.72x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-134 for FLNT. GOOGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLNT's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOGL scores 7/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.9% | -134.2% | +39.0% | +6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.5% | -34.3% | +27.4% | +3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.3% | -31.8% | +25.1% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.2% | -76.6% | +30.3% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.60x | 2.07x | 0.14x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $83M | $25M | $28.6B | -$463M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $298M | $13M | $30.7B | $766M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $381M | $38M | $59.3B | $303M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 146.13x | -3.74x | 392.15x | 20.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACMR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,342 for FLNT. Over the past 12 months, ACMR leads with a +195.6% total return vs UPWK's -34.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 80.5% vs FLNT's -14.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -46.5% | +9.5% | +26.4% | +31.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -34.8% | +19.9% | +163.5% | +195.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.0% | -37.8% | +270.8% | +487.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.8% | -86.6% | +239.8% | +133.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.9% | -90.7% | +996.1% | +3065.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.7% | -14.6% | +54.8% | +80.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLNT and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FLNT is the less volatile stock with a 1.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACMR's 3.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs UPWK's 46.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.16x | 1.14x | 1.26x | 3.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.84 | $4.15 | $400.10 | $71.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.02 | $1.50 | $147.84 | $19.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.5% | +66.7% | +99.5% | +82.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.0 | 38.9 | 83.4 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.4M | 33K | 28.3M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GOOGL and ACMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UPWK as "Buy", FLNT as "Hold", GOOGL as "Buy", ACMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 118.1% upside for UPWK (target: $23) vs -32.4% for ACMR (target: $40). For income investors, GOOGL offers the higher dividend yield at 0.21% vs ACMR's 0.19%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.14 | $3.50 | $406.28 | $40.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 2 | 82 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.2% | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.82 | $0.11 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.8% | 0.0% | +0.9% | +0.2% |
GOOGL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UPWK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
UPWK vs FLNT vs GOOGL vs ACMR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UPWK or FLNT or GOOGL or ACMR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the stronger pick with 15. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 0% for Fluent, Inc. (FLNT). Upwork Inc. (UPWK) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Upwork Inc. (UPWK) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UPWK or FLNT or GOOGL or ACMR?
On trailing P/E, Upwork Inc.
(UPWK) is the cheapest at 12. 8x versus ACM Research, Inc. at 43. 2x. On forward P/E, Upwork Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ACM Research, Inc. wins at 0. 84x versus Alphabet Inc. 's 0. 99x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UPWK or FLNT or GOOGL or ACMR?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -86. 6% for Fluent, Inc. (FLNT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +30. 7% versus FLNT's -90. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UPWK or FLNT or GOOGL or ACMR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fluent, Inc.
(FLNT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 14β versus ACM Research, Inc. 's 3. 24β — meaning ACMR is approximately 184% more volatile than FLNT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 2% for Fluent, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UPWK or FLNT or GOOGL or ACMR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is pulling ahead at 15. 2% versus -18. 0% for Fluent, Inc. (FLNT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fluent, Inc. grew EPS 41. 7% year-over-year, compared to -45. 4% for Upwork Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACMR leads at 32. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UPWK or FLNT or GOOGL or ACMR?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -13. 0% for Fluent, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus -9. 7% for FLNT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UPWK leads at 77. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UPWK or FLNT or GOOGL or ACMR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 84x versus Alphabet Inc. 's 0. 99x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Upwork Inc. (UPWK) trades at 7. 4x forward P/E versus 29. 7x for ACM Research, Inc. — 22. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UPWK: 118. 1% to $23. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — UPWK or FLNT or GOOGL or ACMR?
In this comparison, GOOGL (0.
2% yield), ACMR (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. UPWK, FLNT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UPWK or FLNT or GOOGL or ACMR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +996. 1% 10Y return). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOGL: +996. 1%, ACMR: +30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UPWK and FLNT and GOOGL and ACMR?
These companies operate in different sectors (UPWK (Industrials) and FLNT (Communication Services) and GOOGL (Communication Services) and ACMR (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UPWK is a small-cap deep-value stock; FLNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.