Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

UPWK vs FLNT vs GOOGL vs ACMR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
UPWK
Upwork Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.38B
5Y Perf.-14.7%
FLNT
Fluent, Inc.

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$82M
5Y Perf.-76.9%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.81T
5Y Perf.+455.2%
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.92B
5Y Perf.+197.0%

UPWK vs FLNT vs GOOGL vs ACMR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
UPWK logoUPWK
FLNT logoFLNT
GOOGL logoGOOGL
ACMR logoACMR
IndustryStaffing & Employment ServicesAdvertising AgenciesInternet Content & InformationSemiconductors
Market Cap$1.38B$82M$4.81T$3.92B
Revenue (TTM)$595M$209M$422.57B$901M
Net Income (TTM)$109M$-27M$160.21B$94M
Gross Margin103.0%24.5%60.4%44.4%
Operating Margin20.7%-9.7%32.7%12.1%
Forward P/E7.4x29.6x29.7x
Total Debt$381M$38M$59.29B$303M
Cash & Equiv.$298M$13M$30.71B$766M

UPWK vs FLNT vs GOOGL vs ACMRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

UPWK
FLNT
GOOGL
ACMR
StockMay 20May 26Return
Upwork Inc. (UPWK)10085.3-14.7%
Fluent, Inc. (FLNT)10023.1-76.9%
Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL)100555.2+455.2%
ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR)100297.0+197.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: UPWK vs FLNT vs GOOGL vs ACMR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GOOGL leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. ACM Research, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. UPWK and FLNT also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
UPWK
Upwork Inc.
The Value Play

UPWK is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (7.4x vs 29.6x)
Best for: value
FLNT
Fluent, Inc.
The Defensive Choice

FLNT is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.

  • Beta 1.14 vs ACMR's 3.24
Best for: stability
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
The Income Pick

GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.26, yield 0.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 14.3%, current ratio 2.01x
  • Beta 1.26, yield 0.2%, current ratio 2.01x
  • 37.9% margin vs FLNT's -13.0%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.
The Growth Play

ACMR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth -10.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.3%
  • 30.7% 10Y total return vs GOOGL's 10.0%
  • PEG 0.84 vs GOOGL's 0.99
  • 15.2% revenue growth vs FLNT's -18.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthACMR logoACMR15.2% revenue growth vs FLNT's -18.0%
ValueUPWK logoUPWKLower P/E (7.4x vs 29.6x)
Quality / MarginsGOOGL logoGOOGL37.9% margin vs FLNT's -13.0%
Stability / SafetyFLNT logoFLNTBeta 1.14 vs ACMR's 3.24
DividendsGOOGL logoGOOGL0.2% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)ACMR logoACMR+195.6% vs UPWK's -34.8%
Efficiency (ROA)GOOGL logoGOOGL27.4% ROA vs FLNT's -34.3%, ROIC 25.1% vs -31.8%

UPWK vs FLNT vs GOOGL vs ACMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

UPWKUpwork Inc.
FY 2025
Enterprise
86.7%$683M
Marketplace
13.3%$105M
FLNTFluent, Inc.
FY 2024
Fluent Segment
100.0%$241M
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.
FY 2025
Google Search & Other
55.7%$224.5B
Google Cloud
14.6%$58.7B
Google Inc.
11.9%$48.0B
YouTube Advertising Revenue
10.0%$40.4B
Google Network
7.4%$29.8B
Other Bets
0.4%$1.5B
Other Segments
-0.0%$-127,000,000
ACMRACM Research, Inc.
FY 2025
Total Single Wafer and Semi-Critical Cleaning Equipment
69.5%$626M
ECP Front End And Packaging Furnace And Other Technologies
22.1%$200M
Advanced Packaging (exclude ECP), Services & Spares
8.4%$76M

UPWK vs FLNT vs GOOGL vs ACMR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGOOGLLAGGINGFLNT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

GOOGL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 2024.1x FLNT's $209M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FLNT's -13.0%. On growth, GOOGL holds the edge at +21.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricUPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.FLNT logoFLNTFluent, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$595M$209M$422.6B$901M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$150M-$11M$161.3B$126M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$109M-$27M$160.2B$94M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$224M-$5M$73.3B-$69M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+103.0%+24.5%+60.4%+44.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.7%-9.7%+32.7%+12.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+18.3%-13.0%+37.9%+10.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+37.7%-2.4%+17.3%-7.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%-5.5%+21.8%+9.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+29.6%+31.6%+81.9%-76.1%
GOOGL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

UPWK leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 12.8x trailing earnings, UPWK trades at a 70% valuation discount to ACMR's 43.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ACMR offers better value at 1.22x vs GOOGL's 1.23x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricUPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.FLNT logoFLNTFluent, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$1.4B$82M$4.81T$3.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.5B$107M$4.84T$3.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.78x-2.64x36.82x43.21x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.37x29.61x29.68x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.23x1.22x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.66x32.22x27.49x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.76x0.39x11.95x4.35x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.35x3.95x11.72x2.06x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.71x65.72x
UPWK leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

GOOGL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-134 for FLNT. GOOGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLNT's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOGL scores 7/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricUPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.FLNT logoFLNTFluent, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+17.9%-134.2%+39.0%+6.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+8.5%-34.3%+27.4%+3.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+14.3%-31.8%+25.1%+7.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+16.2%-76.6%+30.3%+6.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96372
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.60x2.07x0.14x0.16x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$83M$25M$28.6B-$463M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$298M$13M$30.7B$766M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$381M$38M$59.3B$303M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense146.13x-3.74x392.15x20.44x
GOOGL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ACMR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,342 for FLNT. Over the past 12 months, ACMR leads with a +195.6% total return vs UPWK's -34.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 80.5% vs FLNT's -14.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricUPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.FLNT logoFLNTFluent, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-46.5%+9.5%+26.4%+31.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-34.8%+19.9%+163.5%+195.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+32.0%-37.8%+270.8%+487.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-74.8%-86.6%+239.8%+133.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-49.9%-90.7%+996.1%+3065.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+9.7%-14.6%+54.8%+80.5%
ACMR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FLNT and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FLNT is the less volatile stock with a 1.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACMR's 3.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs UPWK's 46.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricUPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.FLNT logoFLNTFluent, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.16x1.14x1.26x3.24x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$22.84$4.15$400.10$71.65
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.02$1.50$147.84$19.26
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+46.5%+66.7%+99.5%+82.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10035.038.983.460.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.4M33K28.3M1.2M
Evenly matched — FLNT and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — GOOGL and ACMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: UPWK as "Buy", FLNT as "Hold", GOOGL as "Buy", ACMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 118.1% upside for UPWK (target: $23) vs -32.4% for ACMR (target: $40). For income investors, GOOGL offers the higher dividend yield at 0.21% vs ACMR's 0.19%.

MetricUPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.FLNT logoFLNTFluent, Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$23.14$3.50$406.28$40.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2328210
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%+0.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises23
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.82$0.11
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+9.8%0.0%+0.9%+0.2%
Evenly matched — GOOGL and ACMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

GOOGL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UPWK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallAlphabet Inc. (GOOGL)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

UPWK vs FLNT vs GOOGL vs ACMR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is UPWK or FLNT or GOOGL or ACMR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) is the stronger pick with 15. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 0% for Fluent, Inc. (FLNT). Upwork Inc. (UPWK) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Upwork Inc. (UPWK) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — UPWK or FLNT or GOOGL or ACMR?

On trailing P/E, Upwork Inc.

(UPWK) is the cheapest at 12. 8x versus ACM Research, Inc. at 43. 2x. On forward P/E, Upwork Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ACM Research, Inc. wins at 0. 84x versus Alphabet Inc. 's 0. 99x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — UPWK or FLNT or GOOGL or ACMR?

Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.

(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -86. 6% for Fluent, Inc. (FLNT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +30. 7% versus FLNT's -90. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — UPWK or FLNT or GOOGL or ACMR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fluent, Inc.

(FLNT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 14β versus ACM Research, Inc. 's 3. 24β — meaning ACMR is approximately 184% more volatile than FLNT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 2% for Fluent, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — UPWK or FLNT or GOOGL or ACMR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) is pulling ahead at 15. 2% versus -18. 0% for Fluent, Inc. (FLNT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fluent, Inc. grew EPS 41. 7% year-over-year, compared to -45. 4% for Upwork Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACMR leads at 32. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — UPWK or FLNT or GOOGL or ACMR?

Alphabet Inc.

(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -13. 0% for Fluent, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus -9. 7% for FLNT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UPWK leads at 77. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is UPWK or FLNT or GOOGL or ACMR more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 84x versus Alphabet Inc. 's 0. 99x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Upwork Inc. (UPWK) trades at 7. 4x forward P/E versus 29. 7x for ACM Research, Inc. — 22. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UPWK: 118. 1% to $23. 14.

08

Which pays a better dividend — UPWK or FLNT or GOOGL or ACMR?

In this comparison, GOOGL (0.

2% yield), ACMR (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. UPWK, FLNT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is UPWK or FLNT or GOOGL or ACMR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Alphabet Inc.

(GOOGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 26), +996. 1% 10Y return). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOGL: +996. 1%, ACMR: +30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between UPWK and FLNT and GOOGL and ACMR?

These companies operate in different sectors (UPWK (Industrials) and FLNT (Communication Services) and GOOGL (Communication Services) and ACMR (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: UPWK is a small-cap deep-value stock; FLNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

UPWK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FLNT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GOOGL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACMR

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform UPWK and FLNT and GOOGL and ACMR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(UPWK: -100.0% · FLNT: -5.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.