Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
URBN vs CRI vs ANF vs PVH vs VFC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Manufacturers
Apparel - Manufacturers
URBN vs CRI vs ANF vs PVH vs VFC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $6.32B | $1.32B | $3.60B | $4.06B | $7.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.17B | $2.95B | $5.27B | $8.78B | $9.58B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $465M | $91M | $507M | $469M | $223M |
| Gross Margin | 36.0% | 44.7% | 58.6% | 58.2% | 53.8% |
| Operating Margin | 9.9% | 5.0% | 13.4% | 7.4% | 4.6% |
| Forward P/E | 13.4x | 10.8x | 8.0x | 8.1x | 23.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.23B | $1.21B | $1.17B | $3.39B | $5.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $369M | $487M | $760M | $748M | $429M |
URBN vs CRI vs ANF vs PVH vs VFC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Urban Outfitters, I… (URBN) | 100 | 415.8 | +315.8% |
| Carter's, Inc. (CRI) | 100 | 41.6 | -58.4% |
| Abercrombie & Fitch… (ANF) | 100 | 675.6 | +575.6% |
| PVH Corp. (PVH) | 100 | 194.9 | +94.9% |
| V.F. Corporation (VFC) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: URBN vs CRI vs ANF vs PVH vs VFC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
URBN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 11.1%, EPS growth 18.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.35, Low D/E 43.5%, current ratio 1.51x
- PEG 0.06 vs CRI's 15.21
- 11.1% revenue growth vs VFC's -9.1%
CRI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.34, yield 4.4%
- Beta 1.34, yield 4.4%, current ratio 2.51x
- Beta 1.34 vs VFC's 2.36, lower leverage
- 4.4% yield, vs PVH's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
ANF ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 219.7% 10Y total return vs URBN's 143.2%
- 9.6% margin vs VFC's 2.3%
- 15.1% ROA vs VFC's 2.1%, ROIC 31.4% vs 2.7%
Among these 5 stocks, PVH doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
VFC is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +52.7% vs CRI's +12.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.1% revenue growth vs VFC's -9.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.4x vs 23.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.6% margin vs VFC's 2.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.34 vs VFC's 2.36, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield, vs PVH's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.7% vs CRI's +12.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.1% ROA vs VFC's 2.1%, ROIC 31.4% vs 2.7% |
URBN vs CRI vs ANF vs PVH vs VFC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
URBN vs CRI vs ANF vs PVH vs VFC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ANF leads in 3 of 6 categories
CRI leads 1 • URBN leads 0 • PVH leads 0 • VFC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ANF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VFC is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.6B annually — 3.2x CRI's $2.9B. ANF is the more profitable business, keeping 9.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VFC's 2.3%. On growth, URBN holds the edge at +10.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.2B | $2.9B | $5.3B | $8.8B | $9.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $614M | $188M | $862M | $924M | $748M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $465M | $91M | $507M | $469M | $223M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $445M | $127M | $378M | $516M | -$666M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.0% | +44.7% | +58.6% | +58.2% | +53.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +5.0% | +13.4% | +7.4% | +4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.5% | +3.1% | +9.6% | +5.3% | +2.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.2% | +4.3% | +7.2% | +5.9% | -6.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.1% | +8.1% | +5.4% | +4.5% | +1.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.0% | -7.0% | +3.1% | +65.0% | +76.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ANF and PVH each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.5x trailing earnings, ANF trades at a 46% valuation discount to URBN's 13.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), URBN offers better value at 0.06x vs CRI's 15.21x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.3B | $1.3B | $3.6B | $4.1B | $7.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.2B | $2.0B | $4.0B | $6.7B | $12.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.92x | 13.80x | 7.51x | 8.39x | -38.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.36x | 10.80x | 7.98x | 8.12x | 23.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.06x | 15.21x | — | 0.62x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.77x | 10.26x | 4.68x | 6.61x | 22.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.02x | 0.45x | 0.68x | 0.47x | 0.78x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.30x | 1.37x | 2.68x | 0.98x | 5.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.20x | 19.21x | 9.52x | 6.97x | 21.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ANF leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ANF delivers a 38.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $10 for PVH. URBN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VFC's 3.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), URBN scores 8/9 vs ANF's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.5% | +10.1% | +38.5% | +9.6% | +12.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.3% | +3.6% | +15.1% | +4.0% | +2.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.1% | +6.7% | +31.4% | +7.0% | +2.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.5% | +7.2% | +30.5% | +8.8% | +3.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | 1.31x | 0.82x | 0.66x | 3.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $856M | $725M | $409M | $2.6B | $4.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $369M | $487M | $760M | $748M | $429M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $3.4B | $5.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2531.08x | 3.12x | 302.38x | 2.42x | 3.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ANF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ANF five years ago would be worth $19,266 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,709 for VFC. Over the past 12 months, VFC leads with a +52.7% total return vs CRI's +12.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ANF at 49.9% vs CRI's -14.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.5% | +8.4% | -36.6% | +30.7% | +5.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.0% | +12.1% | +12.7% | +24.6% | +52.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +149.2% | -36.7% | +237.1% | +7.7% | -7.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +78.4% | -56.4% | +92.7% | -24.8% | -72.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +143.2% | -47.0% | +219.7% | -1.9% | -45.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.6% | -14.1% | +49.9% | +2.5% | -2.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CRI and PVH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CRI is the less volatile stock with a 1.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VFC's 2.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PVH currently trades 88.5% from its 52-week high vs ANF's 59.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.35x | 1.34x | 1.42x | 1.48x | 2.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $84.35 | $44.44 | $133.11 | $100.15 | $22.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $51.12 | $23.38 | $65.45 | $59.60 | $11.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.5% | +80.4% | +59.0% | +88.5% | +86.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.7 | 54.2 | 33.0 | 60.3 | 54.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 1.2M | 1.2M | 1.1M | 6.0M |
Analyst Outlook
CRI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: URBN as "Hold", CRI as "Buy", ANF as "Hold", PVH as "Buy", VFC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 53.9% upside for ANF (target: $121) vs 3.5% for CRI (target: $37). For income investors, CRI offers the higher dividend yield at 4.45% vs PVH's 0.17%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $89.57 | $37.00 | $120.80 | $100.00 | $20.27 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 58 | 24 | 55 | 38 | 58 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.4% | — | +0.2% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.59 | — | $0.15 | $0.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.5% | 0.0% | +12.5% | +12.9% | +0.0% |
ANF leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CRI leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
URBN vs CRI vs ANF vs PVH vs VFC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is URBN or CRI or ANF or PVH or VFC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Urban Outfitters, Inc.
(URBN) is the stronger pick with 11. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 1% for V. F. Corporation (VFC). Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Carter's, Inc. (CRI) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — URBN or CRI or ANF or PVH or VFC?
On trailing P/E, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) is the cheapest at 7. 5x versus Urban Outfitters, Inc. at 13. 9x. On forward P/E, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. is actually cheaper at 8. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Urban Outfitters, Inc. wins at 0. 06x versus Carter's, Inc. 's 15. 21x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — URBN or CRI or ANF or PVH or VFC?
Over the past 5 years, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) delivered a total return of +92. 7%, compared to -72. 9% for V. F. Corporation (VFC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ANF returned +219. 7% versus CRI's -47. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — URBN or CRI or ANF or PVH or VFC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Carter's, Inc.
(CRI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 34β versus V. F. Corporation's 2. 36β — meaning VFC is approximately 77% more volatile than CRI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 4% for V. F. Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — URBN or CRI or ANF or PVH or VFC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Urban Outfitters, Inc.
(URBN) is pulling ahead at 11. 1% versus -9. 1% for V. F. Corporation (VFC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: V. F. Corporation grew EPS 80. 3% year-over-year, compared to -49. 4% for Carter's, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ANF leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — URBN or CRI or ANF or PVH or VFC?
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 6% net margin versus -2. 0% for V. F. Corporation — meaning it keeps 9. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ANF leads at 13. 3% versus 3. 2% for VFC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PVH leads at 59. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is URBN or CRI or ANF or PVH or VFC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 06x versus Carter's, Inc. 's 15. 21x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 23. 1x for V. F. Corporation — 15. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ANF: 53. 9% to $120. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — URBN or CRI or ANF or PVH or VFC?
In this comparison, CRI (4.
4% yield), VFC (1. 9% yield), PVH (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. URBN, ANF do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is URBN or CRI or ANF or PVH or VFC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Carter's, Inc.
(CRI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (4. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRI: -47. 0%, PVH: -1. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between URBN and CRI and ANF and PVH and VFC?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: URBN is a small-cap deep-value stock; CRI is a small-cap deep-value stock; ANF is a small-cap deep-value stock; PVH is a small-cap deep-value stock; VFC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CRI, VFC pay a dividend while URBN, ANF, PVH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.