Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
URGN vs NUVL vs IMVT vs PCVX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
URGN vs NUVL vs IMVT vs PCVX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.29B | $7.53B | $5.53B | $7.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $140M | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-133M | $-450M | $-464M | $-947M |
| Gross Margin | 89.9% | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -77.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $128M | $0.00 | $98K | $229M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $111M | $262M | $714M | $174M |
URGN vs NUVL vs IMVT vs PCVX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| UroGen Pharma Ltd. (URGN) | 100 | 189.7 | +89.7% |
| Nuvalent, Inc. (NUVL) | 100 | 576.9 | +476.9% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 276.7 | +176.7% |
| Vaxcyte, Inc. (PCVX) | 100 | 244.5 | +144.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: URGN vs NUVL vs IMVT vs PCVX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
URGN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 21.4%, EPS growth -7.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.5%
- 21.4% revenue growth vs PCVX's -87.1%
- +162.7% vs NUVL's +53.5%
NUVL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 446.1% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 173.6%
- Beta 1.09, current ratio 15.27x
IMVT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PCVX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.07
- Lower volatility, beta 1.07, Low D/E 8.5%, current ratio 7.91x
- 3.9% margin vs URGN's -94.8%
- Beta 1.07 vs URGN's 1.88
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.4% revenue growth vs PCVX's -87.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.9% margin vs URGN's -94.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.07 vs URGN's 1.88 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +162.7% vs NUVL's +53.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -29.4% ROA vs URGN's -62.8% |
URGN vs NUVL vs IMVT vs PCVX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
URGN vs NUVL vs IMVT vs PCVX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
URGN leads in 1 of 6 categories
PCVX leads 1 • NUVL leads 1 • IMVT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
URGN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
URGN and PCVX operate at a comparable scale, with $140M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $140M | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$106M | -$346M | -$487M | -$1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$133M | -$450M | -$464M | -$947M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$166M | -$313M | -$423M | -$759M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +89.9% | — | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -77.0% | — | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -94.8% | — | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -118.2% | — | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +151.6% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.9% | -17.8% | +19.7% | -121.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NUVL and PCVX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $7.5B | $5.5B | $7.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $7.3B | $4.8B | $7.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.34x | -17.50x | -9.97x | -9.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.79x | — | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.96x | 5.83x | 2.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PCVX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PCVX delivers a -32.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-33 in annual profit, vs $-47 for IMVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PCVX's 0.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IMVT scores 2/9 vs PCVX's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -42.8% | -47.1% | -32.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -62.8% | -37.8% | -44.1% | -29.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -32.5% | — | -24.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -63.4% | -34.4% | -66.1% | -29.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.00x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18M | -$262M | -$714M | $55M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $111M | $262M | $714M | $174M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $128M | $0 | $98,000 | $229M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.86x | -26.85x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NUVL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NUVL five years ago would be worth $54,613 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,594 for URGN. Over the past 12 months, URGN leads with a +162.7% total return vs NUVL's +53.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NUVL at 39.5% vs PCVX's 0.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.1% | +1.5% | +5.1% | +10.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +162.7% | +53.5% | +96.1% | +77.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +114.3% | +171.2% | +40.9% | +1.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.9% | +446.1% | +62.4% | +191.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +90.2% | +446.1% | +173.6% | +96.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.9% | +39.5% | +12.1% | +0.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NUVL and PCVX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PCVX is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than URGN's 1.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NUVL currently trades 90.6% from its 52-week high vs PCVX's 79.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.89x | 1.01x | 1.36x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.00 | $113.02 | $30.09 | $65.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.42 | $63.56 | $13.36 | $28.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.6% | +90.6% | +90.5% | +79.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.7 | 52.9 | 60.2 | 44.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 863K | 544K | 1.4M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: URGN as "Buy", NUVL as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", PCVX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.2% upside for IMVT (target: $46) vs 41.0% for NUVL (target: $144).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $40.00 | $144.40 | $45.50 | $83.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 14 | 23 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
URGN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PCVX leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
URGN vs NUVL vs IMVT vs PCVX: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is URGN or NUVL or IMVT or PCVX a better buy right now?
Analysts rate UroGen Pharma Ltd.
(URGN) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — URGN or NUVL or IMVT or PCVX?
Over the past 5 years, Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) delivered a total return of +446. 1%, compared to +45. 9% for UroGen Pharma Ltd. (URGN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NUVL returned +461. 5% versus PCVX's +102. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — URGN or NUVL or IMVT or PCVX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vaxcyte, Inc.
(PCVX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus UroGen Pharma Ltd. 's 1. 89β — meaning URGN is approximately 95% more volatile than PCVX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 9% for Vaxcyte, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — URGN or NUVL or IMVT or PCVX?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: UroGen Pharma Ltd.
grew EPS -7. 8% year-over-year, compared to -48. 9% for Nuvalent, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — URGN or NUVL or IMVT or PCVX?
Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -139. 8% for UroGen Pharma Ltd. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NUVL leads at 0. 0% versus -113. 7% for URGN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — URGN leads at 88. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — URGN or NUVL or IMVT or PCVX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is URGN or NUVL or IMVT or PCVX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 01), +461. 5% 10Y return). UroGen Pharma Ltd. (URGN) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NUVL: +461. 5%, URGN: +110. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between URGN and NUVL and IMVT and PCVX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: URGN is a small-cap high-growth stock; NUVL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PCVX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.