Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
URGN vs PAHC vs ELAN vs PCVX vs PFE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
URGN vs PAHC vs ELAN vs PCVX vs PFE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $1.29B | $1.75B | $11.99B | $7.43B | $150.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $140M | $1.46B | $4.89B | $0.00 | $63.31B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-133M | $92M | $-242M | $-947M | $7.49B |
| Gross Margin | 89.9% | 31.9% | 49.4% | — | 69.3% |
| Operating Margin | -77.0% | 11.6% | 9.0% | — | 23.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.1x | 22.4x | — | 8.7x |
| Total Debt | $128M | $762M | $4.02B | $229M | $67.42B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $111M | $68M | $545M | $174M | $1.14B |
URGN vs PAHC vs ELAN vs PCVX vs PFE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| UroGen Pharma Ltd. (URGN) | 100 | 112.6 | +12.6% |
| Phibro Animal Healt… (PAHC) | 100 | 152.3 | +52.3% |
| Elanco Animal Healt… (ELAN) | 100 | 110.3 | +10.3% |
| Vaxcyte, Inc. (PCVX) | 100 | 167.7 | +67.7% |
| Pfizer Inc. (PFE) | 100 | 82.8 | -17.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: URGN vs PAHC vs ELAN vs PCVX vs PFE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
URGN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +162.7% vs PFE's +23.7%
PAHC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 27.4%, EPS growth 18.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.2%
- 128.6% 10Y total return vs PCVX's 96.9%
- 27.4% revenue growth vs PCVX's -87.1%
- 6.7% ROA vs URGN's -62.8%
ELAN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PCVX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.07, Low D/E 8.5%, current ratio 7.91x
PFE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 6.5%
- Beta 0.54, yield 6.5%, current ratio 1.16x
- Better valuation composite
- 11.8% margin vs URGN's -94.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.4% revenue growth vs PCVX's -87.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.8% margin vs URGN's -94.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs URGN's 1.88 | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs PAHC's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +162.7% vs PFE's +23.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.7% ROA vs URGN's -62.8% |
URGN vs PAHC vs ELAN vs PCVX vs PFE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
URGN vs PAHC vs ELAN vs PCVX vs PFE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PFE leads in 4 of 6 categories
PAHC leads 2 • URGN leads 0 • ELAN leads 0 • PCVX leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFE and PCVX operate at a comparable scale, with $63.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. PFE is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to URGN's -94.8%. On growth, URGN holds the edge at +151.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $140M | $1.5B | $4.9B | $0 | $63.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$106M | $220M | $957M | -$1.1B | $21.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$133M | $92M | -$242M | -$947M | $7.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$166M | $47M | $315M | -$759M | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +89.9% | +31.9% | +49.4% | — | +69.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -77.0% | +11.6% | +9.0% | — | +23.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -94.8% | +6.3% | -4.9% | — | +11.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -118.2% | +3.2% | +6.4% | — | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +151.6% | +20.9% | +14.9% | — | +5.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.9% | +7.4% | -15.4% | -121.2% | -9.5% |
Valuation Metrics
PFE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.5x trailing earnings, PFE trades at a 46% valuation discount to PAHC's 36.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PFE's 10.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ELAN's 16.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $1.7B | $12.0B | $7.4B | $150.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $2.4B | $15.5B | $7.5B | $216.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.34x | 36.27x | -51.07x | -9.14x | 19.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.10x | 22.43x | — | 8.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.85x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.65x | 16.59x | — | 10.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.79x | 1.35x | 2.54x | — | 2.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 6.15x | 1.82x | 2.61x | 1.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 41.82x | 42.21x | — | 16.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PAHC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PAHC delivers a 30.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-33 for PCVX. PCVX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PAHC's 2.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PFE scores 7/9 vs PCVX's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +30.8% | -3.6% | -32.5% | +8.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -62.8% | +6.7% | -1.8% | -29.4% | +3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +9.8% | +1.9% | -24.2% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -63.4% | +12.0% | +2.2% | -29.7% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.67x | 0.61x | 0.09x | 0.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18M | $694M | $3.5B | $55M | $66.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $111M | $68M | $545M | $174M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $128M | $762M | $4.0B | $229M | $67.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.86x | 3.64x | -0.26x | — | 4.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PAHC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PCVX five years ago would be worth $29,184 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,301 for ELAN. Over the past 12 months, URGN leads with a +162.7% total return vs PFE's +23.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PAHC at 45.9% vs PFE's -6.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.1% | +16.0% | +6.6% | +10.8% | +6.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +162.7% | +125.1% | +99.9% | +77.5% | +23.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +114.3% | +210.4% | +156.5% | +1.2% | -18.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.9% | +66.0% | -27.0% | +191.8% | -13.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +90.2% | +128.6% | -33.3% | +96.9% | +29.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.9% | +45.9% | +36.9% | +0.4% | -6.6% |
Risk & Volatility
PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PFE is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than URGN's 1.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PFE currently trades 92.1% from its 52-week high vs PAHC's 71.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.89x | 1.35x | 1.46x | 0.97x | 0.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.00 | $60.08 | $27.72 | $65.00 | $28.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.42 | $19.00 | $10.75 | $28.09 | $21.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.6% | +71.8% | +86.6% | +79.2% | +92.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.7 | 60.3 | 68.9 | 44.7 | 44.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 863K | 302K | 4.6M | 1.3M | 33.3M |
Analyst Outlook
PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: URGN as "Buy", PAHC as "Buy", ELAN as "Buy", PCVX as "Buy", PFE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 61.2% upside for PCVX (target: $83) vs 3.5% for PFE (target: $27). For income investors, PFE offers the higher dividend yield at 6.49% vs PAHC's 1.11%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $40.00 | $49.00 | $28.00 | $83.00 | $27.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 13 | 20 | 11 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% | — | — | +6.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.48 | — | — | $1.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PFE leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PAHC leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
URGN vs PAHC vs ELAN vs PCVX vs PFE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is URGN or PAHC or ELAN or PCVX or PFE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) is the stronger pick with 27.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). Pfizer Inc. (PFE) offers the better valuation at 19. 5x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UroGen Pharma Ltd. (URGN) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — URGN or PAHC or ELAN or PCVX or PFE?
On trailing P/E, Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) is the cheapest at 19. 5x versus Phibro Animal Health Corporation at 36. 3x. On forward P/E, Pfizer Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — URGN or PAHC or ELAN or PCVX or PFE?
Over the past 5 years, Vaxcyte, Inc.
(PCVX) delivered a total return of +191. 8%, compared to -27. 0% for Elanco Animal Health Incorporated (ELAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PAHC returned +113. 5% versus ELAN's -34. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — URGN or PAHC or ELAN or PCVX or PFE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 49β versus UroGen Pharma Ltd. 's 1. 89β — meaning URGN is approximately 285% more volatile than PFE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vaxcyte, Inc. (PCVX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 3% for Phibro Animal Health Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — URGN or PAHC or ELAN or PCVX or PFE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Phibro Animal Health Corporation (PAHC) is pulling ahead at 27.
4% versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Phibro Animal Health Corporation grew EPS 1883% year-over-year, compared to -169. 1% for Elanco Animal Health Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, URGN leads at 19. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — URGN or PAHC or ELAN or PCVX or PFE?
Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 4% net margin versus -139. 8% for UroGen Pharma Ltd. — meaning it keeps 12. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PFE leads at 24. 7% versus -113. 7% for URGN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — URGN leads at 88. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is URGN or PAHC or ELAN or PCVX or PFE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 22. 4x for Elanco Animal Health Incorporated — 13. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PCVX: 61. 2% to $83. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — URGN or PAHC or ELAN or PCVX or PFE?
In this comparison, PFE (6.
5% yield), PAHC (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. URGN, ELAN, PCVX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is URGN or PAHC or ELAN or PCVX or PFE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 49), 6. 5% yield). UroGen Pharma Ltd. (URGN) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFE: +28. 5%, URGN: +110. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between URGN and PAHC and ELAN and PCVX and PFE?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: URGN is a small-cap high-growth stock; PAHC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ELAN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PCVX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PFE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. PAHC, PFE pay a dividend while URGN, ELAN, PCVX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.