URI vs BLDR

For growth investors, United Rentals, Inc.

(URI) is the stronger pick with 4. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) offers the better valuation at 20. 4x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate United Rentals, Inc. (URI) a "Buy" — based on 40 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc.

(BLDR) is the cheapest at 20. 4x versus United Rentals, Inc. at 24. 5x. On forward P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: United Rentals, Inc. wins at 0. 78x versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 78x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, United Rentals, Inc.

(URI) delivered a total return of +178. 0%, compared to +51. 8% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: URI returned +1483% versus BLDR's +614. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), United Rentals, Inc.

(URI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 19β versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning BLDR is approximately 40% more volatile than URI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 130% versus 184% for United Rentals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), United Rentals, Inc.

(URI) is pulling ahead at 4. 9% versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Rentals, Inc. grew EPS -0. 2% year-over-year, compared to -57. 1% for Builders FirstSource, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, URI leads at 11. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

United Rentals, Inc.

(URI) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus 2. 9% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: URI leads at 24. 7% versus 5. 2% for BLDR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — URI leads at 35. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, United Rentals, Inc. (URI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 78x versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 78x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 20. 1x for United Rentals, Inc. — 6. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLDR: 38. 3% to $109. 92.

In this comparison, URI (0.

8% yield) pays a dividend. BLDR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, United Rentals, Inc.

(URI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 19), 0. 8% yield, +1483% 10Y return). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (URI: +1483%, BLDR: +614. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

URI pays a dividend while BLDR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.