USAC
USA Compression Partners, LP
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$3.26B
5Y Perf.+124.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
USAC vs XOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Oil & Gas Integrated
Market Cap$629.60B
5Y Perf.+226.7%
USAC vs XOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | USAC | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $3.26B | $629.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.08B | $323.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $129M | $28.84B |
| Gross Margin | 40.0% | 21.7% |
| Operating Margin | 30.5% | 10.5% |
| Forward P/E | 19.4x | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $2.55B | $43.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $10.68B |
USAC vs XOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
USAC
XOM
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| USA Compression Par… (USAC) | 100 | 224.1 | +124.1% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 326.7 | +226.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: USAC vs XOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: USAC and XOM are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Exxon Mobil Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
USAC
USA Compression Partners, LP
The Income Pick
USAC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 7.8%
- Rev growth 5.0%, EPS growth 18.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.3%
- 235.0% 10Y total return vs XOM's 107.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
The Value Play
XOM is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (15.0x vs 19.4x)
- +45.7% vs USAC's +25.6%
- 6.4% ROA vs USAC's 4.4%, ROIC 8.6% vs 9.6%
Best for: value and momentum
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | USAC | 5.0% revenue growth vs XOM's -4.5% |
| Value | XOM | Lower P/E (15.0x vs 19.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | USAC | 11.9% margin vs XOM's 8.9% |
| Dividends | USAC | 7.8% yield, vs XOM's 2.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | XOM | +45.7% vs USAC's +25.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | XOM | 6.4% ROA vs USAC's 4.4%, ROIC 8.6% vs 9.6% |
USAC vs XOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
USAC vs XOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLUSACLAGGINGXOM
XOMExxon Mobil Corporati…
1leads
USACUSA Compression Partn…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs XOMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
USAC6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
XOM3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
USAC5/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
USAC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 298.8x USAC's $1.1B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 11.9% (USAC) to 8.9% (XOM). On growth, USAC holds the edge at +35.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | USACUSA Compression P… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $323.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $632M | $59.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $129M | $28.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $241M | $23.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.0% | +21.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | +10.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.2% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.1% | -1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +92.9% | -11.0% |
USAC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
XOM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.2x trailing earnings, XOM trades at a 30% valuation discount to USAC's 31.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, USAC's 9.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than XOM's 11.1x.
| Metric | USACUSA Compression P… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $629.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.8B | $662.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.76x | 22.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.37x | 15.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.62x | 11.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.27x | 1.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.77x | 26.66x |
XOM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
USAC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), USAC scores 6/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | USACUSA Compression P… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.4% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.6% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.8% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.5B | $32.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.6B | $43.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.67x | 69.44x |
USAC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — USAC and XOM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XOM five years ago would be worth $27,178 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $24,655 for USAC. Over the past 12 months, XOM leads with a +45.7% total return vs USAC's +25.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors USAC at 19.3% vs XOM's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | USACUSA Compression P… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.9% | +22.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +25.6% | +45.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.6% | +46.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +146.5% | +171.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +235.0% | +107.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.3% | +13.7% |
Evenly matched — USAC and XOM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — USAC and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USAC's 0.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. USAC currently trades 93.4% from its 52-week high vs XOM's 84.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | USACUSA Compression P… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.38x | -0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.90 | $176.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.85 | $101.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.4% | +84.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 53.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 191K | 18.8M |
Evenly matched — USAC and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — USAC and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates USAC as "Buy" and XOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 8.0% upside for XOM (target: $160) vs 1.9% for USAC (target: $28). For income investors, USAC offers the higher dividend yield at 7.76% vs XOM's 2.69%.
| Metric | USACUSA Compression P… | XOMExxon Mobil Corpo… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.50 | $160.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.8% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 26 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.10 | $4.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% |
Evenly matched — USAC and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
USAC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). XOM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
Best OverallUSA Compression Partners, LP (USAC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
USAC vs XOM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is USAC or XOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) is the stronger pick with 5.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) offers the better valuation at 22. 2x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — USAC or XOM?
On trailing P/E, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the cheapest at 22.
2x versus USA Compression Partners, LP at 31. 8x. On forward P/E, Exxon Mobil Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — USAC or XOM?
Over the past 5 years, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) delivered a total return of +171.
8%, compared to +146. 5% for USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: USAC returned +235. 0% versus XOM's +107. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — USAC or XOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus USA Compression Partners, LP's 0. 38β — meaning USAC is approximately -359% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — USAC or XOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) is pulling ahead at 5.
0% versus -4. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: USA Compression Partners, LP grew EPS 18. 1% year-over-year, compared to -14. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, USAC leads at 12. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — USAC or XOM?
USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) is the more profitable company, earning 11.
2% net margin versus 8. 9% for Exxon Mobil Corporation — meaning it keeps 11. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: USAC leads at 31. 9% versus 10. 5% for XOM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — USAC leads at 38. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is USAC or XOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) trades at 15.
0x forward P/E versus 19. 4x for USA Compression Partners, LP — 4. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XOM: 8. 0% to $160. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — USAC or XOM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
USA Compression Partners, LP (USAC) offers the highest yield at 7. 8%, versus 2. 7% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM).
09Is USAC or XOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 7% yield, +107. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +107. 4%, USAC: +235. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between USAC and XOM?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: USAC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(USAC: 35.1% · XOM: -1.3%)Net Margin>
%
(USAC: 11.9% · XOM: 8.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(USAC: 31.8x · XOM: 22.2x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.