Gold
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
USAU vs GORO vs USAS vs GPOR vs MGLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
Industrial Materials
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Asset Management
USAU vs GORO vs USAS vs GPOR vs MGLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Gold | Industrial Materials | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $273M | $231M | $2.03B | $3.23B | $48M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $93M | $109M | $1.42B | $30M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-20M | $-6M | $-61M | $594M | $-3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 18.9% | 3.3% | 47.8% | 72.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 13.1% | -25.5% | 40.2% | -22.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 28.6x | 26.3x | 7.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $34K | $91M | $24M | $789M | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $25M | $20M | $2M | $5M |
USAU vs GORO vs USAS vs GPOR vs MGLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. Gold Corp. (USAU) | 100 | 237.0 | +137.0% |
| Gold Resource Corpo… (GORO) | 100 | 63.8 | -36.2% |
| Americas Gold and S… (USAS) | 100 | 295.4 | +195.4% |
| Gulfport Energy Cor… (GPOR) | 100 | 199.1 | +99.1% |
| The Marygold Compan… (MGLD) | 100 | 60.5 | -39.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: USAU vs GORO vs USAS vs GPOR vs MGLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
USAU is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.02
- Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 10.11x
- Beta 1.02, current ratio 10.11x
GORO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 44.0%, EPS growth 92.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -12.5%
- 44.0% revenue growth vs USAU's -100.0%
USAS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +418.7% vs GPOR's -5.6%
GPOR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 145.1% 10Y total return vs USAS's -5.1%
- Better valuation composite
- 41.9% margin vs USAS's -56.2%
- Beta 0.14 vs USAS's 2.31, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, MGLD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 44.0% revenue growth vs USAU's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 41.9% margin vs USAS's -56.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs USAS's 2.31, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +418.7% vs GPOR's -5.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs USAU's -58.1%, ROIC 14.8% vs -126.6% |
USAU vs GORO vs USAS vs GPOR vs MGLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
USAU vs GORO vs USAS vs GPOR vs MGLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GPOR leads in 3 of 6 categories
USAS leads 1 • MGLD leads 1 • USAU leads 0 • GORO leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GPOR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GPOR and USAU operate at a comparable scale, with $1.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. GPOR is the more profitable business, keeping 41.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to USAS's -56.2%. On growth, GORO holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $93M | $109M | $1.4B | $30M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$17M | $25M | -$7M | $884M | -$4M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$20M | -$6M | -$61M | $594M | -$3M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | -$4M | -$52M | $362M | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +18.9% | +3.3% | +47.8% | +72.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +13.1% | -25.5% | +40.2% | -22.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -6.9% | -56.2% | +41.9% | -19.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -4.2% | -47.7% | +25.5% | -11.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.5% | +45.6% | +27.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.2% | +193.3% | +55.3% | +127.7% | +68.7% |
Valuation Metrics
GPOR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GPOR's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GORO's 11.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $273M | $231M | $2.0B | $3.2B | $48M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $265M | $297M | $2.0B | $4.0B | $46M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.22x | -30.43x | -15.19x | 8.32x | -8.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 28.60x | 26.30x | 6.95x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.93x | — | 4.98x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.48x | 20.24x | 2.44x | 1.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 16.37x | 4.46x | 12.65x | 1.80x | 2.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 359.20x | — | 11.71x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GPOR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GPOR delivers a 32.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-122 for USAS. USAU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GORO's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GORO scores 7/9 vs MGLD's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -68.1% | -22.7% | -122.1% | +32.7% | -14.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -58.1% | -4.0% | -26.1% | +19.8% | -11.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -126.6% | +13.5% | -26.3% | +14.8% | -18.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -56.4% | +8.2% | -21.6% | +19.3% | -26.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 2.07x | 0.45x | 0.43x | 0.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | $66M | $4M | $787M | -$3M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $25M | $20M | $2M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $34,410 | $91M | $24M | $789M | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.73x | -18.89x | 11.16x | -3.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
USAS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GPOR five years ago would be worth $24,510 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,319 for MGLD. Over the past 12 months, USAS leads with a +418.7% total return vs GPOR's -5.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors USAS at 80.8% vs MGLD's -11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.2% | +70.2% | +24.9% | -13.3% | +27.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +57.3% | +143.4% | +418.7% | -5.6% | +32.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +272.8% | +50.5% | +490.7% | +96.1% | -31.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +53.3% | -45.8% | +35.7% | +145.1% | -66.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.0% | -47.8% | -5.1% | +145.1% | -66.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +55.1% | +14.6% | +80.8% | +25.2% | -11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
MGLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MGLD is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USAS's 2.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MGLD currently trades 81.5% from its 52-week high vs USAS's 60.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.02x | 0.38x | 2.31x | 0.14x | -0.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.75 | $1.87 | $10.50 | $225.78 | $1.38 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.75 | $0.43 | $1.06 | $160.95 | $0.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.9% | +76.5% | +60.8% | +79.2% | +81.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.2 | 47.9 | 56.3 | 34.6 | 51.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 276K | 1.8M | 5.8M | 320K | 17K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: USAU as "Buy", GORO as "Buy", USAS as "Buy", GPOR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.2% upside for USAU (target: $27) vs 35.3% for GPOR (target: $242).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $26.75 | $2.00 | $9.75 | $242.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.09 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +10.0% | 0.0% |
GPOR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). USAS leads in 1 (Total Returns).
USAU vs GORO vs USAS vs GPOR vs MGLD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is USAU or GORO or USAS or GPOR or MGLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gold Resource Corporation (GORO) is the stronger pick with 44.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 2% for The Marygold Companies, Inc. (MGLD). Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate U. S. Gold Corp. (USAU) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — USAU or GORO or USAS or GPOR or MGLD?
On forward P/E, Gulfport Energy Corporation is actually cheaper at 7.
0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — USAU or GORO or USAS or GPOR or MGLD?
Over the past 5 years, Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) delivered a total return of +145.
1%, compared to -66. 8% for The Marygold Companies, Inc. (MGLD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GPOR returned +145. 1% versus USAU's -68. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — USAU or GORO or USAS or GPOR or MGLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Marygold Companies, Inc.
(MGLD) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 02β versus Americas Gold and Silver Corporation's 2. 31β — meaning USAS is approximately -13198% more volatile than MGLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, U. S. Gold Corp. (USAU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for Gold Resource Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — USAU or GORO or USAS or GPOR or MGLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gold Resource Corporation (GORO) is pulling ahead at 44.
0% versus -8. 2% for The Marygold Companies, Inc. (MGLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gulfport Energy Corporation grew EPS 245. 9% year-over-year, compared to -143. 2% for U. S. Gold Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, USAS leads at 30. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — USAU or GORO or USAS or GPOR or MGLD?
Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
3% net margin versus -44. 9% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GPOR leads at 37. 9% versus -26. 2% for USAS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MGLD leads at 72. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is USAU or GORO or USAS or GPOR or MGLD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) trades at 7.
0x forward P/E versus 28. 6x for Gold Resource Corporation — 21. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USAU: 61. 2% to $26. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — USAU or GORO or USAS or GPOR or MGLD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is USAU or GORO or USAS or GPOR or MGLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Marygold Companies, Inc.
(MGLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 02)). Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGLD: -66. 8%, USAS: -5. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between USAU and GORO and USAS and GPOR and MGLD?
These companies operate in different sectors (USAU (Basic Materials) and GORO (Basic Materials) and USAS (Basic Materials) and GPOR (Energy) and MGLD (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: USAU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GORO is a small-cap high-growth stock; USAS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GPOR is a small-cap high-growth stock; MGLD is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.