Food Distribution
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
USFD vs WDFC vs KR vs SYY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Grocery Stores
Food Distribution
USFD vs WDFC vs KR vs SYY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Food Distribution | Chemicals - Specialty | Grocery Stores | Food Distribution |
| Market Cap | $19.16B | $4.19B | $42.03B | $34.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $39.68B | $621M | $147.64B | $83.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $677M | $90M | $1.02B | $1.74B |
| Gross Margin | 17.4% | 55.4% | 22.3% | 18.5% |
| Operating Margin | 3.1% | 16.4% | 1.3% | 3.6% |
| Forward P/E | 18.2x | 35.0x | 12.7x | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $5.72B | $98M | $24.68B | $14.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41M | $58M | $3.33B | $1.07B |
USFD vs WDFC vs KR vs SYY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| US Foods Holding Co… (USFD) | 100 | 453.9 | +353.9% |
| WD-40 Company (WDFC) | 100 | 109.3 | +9.3% |
| The Kroger Co. (KR) | 100 | 203.6 | +103.6% |
| Sysco Corporation (SYY) | 100 | 132.1 | +32.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: USFD vs WDFC vs KR vs SYY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
USFD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 248.8% 10Y total return vs KR's 108.7%
- +25.7% vs WDFC's -8.3%
WDFC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 5.0%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.18, Low D/E 36.4%, current ratio 2.79x
- 5.0% revenue growth vs KR's 0.4%
- 14.4% margin vs KR's 0.7%
KR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (12.7x vs 35.0x)
SYY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 2.8%
- PEG 0.29 vs WDFC's 4.01
- Beta 0.47, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.21x
- 2.8% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs KR's 2.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.0% revenue growth vs KR's 0.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 35.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.4% margin vs KR's 0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.18 vs USFD's 0.50, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs KR's 2.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.7% vs WDFC's -8.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.5% ROA vs KR's 2.0%, ROIC 26.2% vs 5.0% |
USFD vs WDFC vs KR vs SYY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
USFD vs WDFC vs KR vs SYY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WDFC leads in 2 of 6 categories
KR leads 2 • USFD leads 1 • SYY leads 1
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WDFC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KR is the larger business by revenue, generating $147.6B annually — 237.8x WDFC's $621M. WDFC is the more profitable business, keeping 14.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KR's 0.7%. On growth, SYY holds the edge at +4.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $39.7B | $621M | $147.6B | $83.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.6B | $111M | $5.5B | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $677M | $90M | $1.0B | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $848M | $78M | $3.5B | $2.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.4% | +55.4% | +22.3% | +18.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | +16.4% | +1.3% | +3.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +14.4% | +0.7% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +12.6% | +2.4% | +2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +0.6% | +1.2% | +4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.1% | -7.9% | +50.0% | -13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
KR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.5x trailing earnings, SYY trades at a 55% valuation discount to KR's 43.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYY offers better value at 0.36x vs WDFC's 3.59x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $19.2B | $4.2B | $42.0B | $34.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24.8B | $4.2B | $63.4B | $48.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.55x | 31.35x | 43.12x | 19.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.20x | 35.02x | 12.68x | 15.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.59x | — | 0.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.67x | 37.76x | 10.91x | 11.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.49x | 6.76x | 0.28x | 0.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.64x | 10.61x | 7.33x | 19.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.98x | 50.23x | 12.55x | 19.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WDFC leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY delivers a 80.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $13 for KR. WDFC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYY's 7.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), USFD scores 7/9 vs SYY's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.3% | +33.9% | +13.0% | +80.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.8% | +19.5% | +2.0% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.3% | +26.2% | +5.0% | +15.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.0% | +28.9% | +5.5% | +19.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.33x | 0.36x | 4.16x | 7.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.7B | $40M | $21.3B | $13.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $58M | $3.3B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.7B | $98M | $24.7B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.94x | 32.08x | 2.59x | 4.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
USFD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in USFD five years ago would be worth $21,415 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,346 for WDFC. Over the past 12 months, USFD leads with a +25.7% total return vs WDFC's -8.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors USFD at 31.2% vs SYY's 1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.4% | +7.6% | +6.0% | +1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +25.7% | -8.3% | -6.4% | +6.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +125.7% | +19.6% | +42.7% | +4.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +114.1% | -6.5% | +90.7% | -3.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +248.8% | +122.4% | +108.7% | +82.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.2% | +6.1% | +12.6% | +1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
KR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KR is the less volatile stock with a -0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USFD's 0.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KR currently trades 86.7% from its 52-week high vs SYY's 79.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 0.18x | -0.64x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $102.13 | $253.24 | $76.58 | $91.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $66.89 | $175.38 | $58.60 | $68.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.1% | +82.8% | +86.7% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 46.3 | 39.2 | 41.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 177K | 5.6M | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
SYY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: USFD as "Buy", WDFC as "Hold", KR as "Buy", SYY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 43.0% upside for WDFC (target: $300) vs 12.6% for KR (target: $75). For income investors, SYY offers the higher dividend yield at 2.80% vs WDFC's 1.77%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $108.33 | $300.00 | $74.75 | $90.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 7 | 44 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.8% | +2.0% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 22 | 21 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.70 | $1.35 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.1% | +0.3% | +6.4% | +3.6% |
WDFC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
USFD vs WDFC vs KR vs SYY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is USFD or WDFC or KR or SYY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, WD-40 Company (WDFC) is the stronger pick with 5.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 4% for The Kroger Co. (KR). Sysco Corporation (SYY) offers the better valuation at 19. 5x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate US Foods Holding Corp. (USFD) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — USFD or WDFC or KR or SYY?
On trailing P/E, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the cheapest at 19.
5x versus The Kroger Co. at 43. 1x. On forward P/E, The Kroger Co. is actually cheaper at 12. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sysco Corporation wins at 0. 29x versus WD-40 Company's 4. 01x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — USFD or WDFC or KR or SYY?
Over the past 5 years, US Foods Holding Corp.
(USFD) delivered a total return of +114. 1%, compared to -6. 5% for WD-40 Company (WDFC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: USFD returned +248. 8% versus SYY's +82. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — USFD or WDFC or KR or SYY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 64β versus US Foods Holding Corp. 's 0. 50β — meaning USFD is approximately -178% more volatile than KR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WD-40 Company (WDFC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — USFD or WDFC or KR or SYY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), WD-40 Company (WDFC) is pulling ahead at 5.
0% versus 0. 4% for The Kroger Co. (KR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: US Foods Holding Corp. grew EPS 45. 5% year-over-year, compared to -58. 0% for The Kroger Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WDFC leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — USFD or WDFC or KR or SYY?
WD-40 Company (WDFC) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
7% net margin versus 0. 7% for The Kroger Co. — meaning it keeps 14. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WDFC leads at 16. 7% versus 1. 3% for KR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WDFC leads at 55. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is USFD or WDFC or KR or SYY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 29x versus WD-40 Company's 4. 01x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Kroger Co. (KR) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 35. 0x for WD-40 Company — 22. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WDFC: 43. 0% to $300. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — USFD or WDFC or KR or SYY?
In this comparison, SYY (2.
8% yield), KR (2. 0% yield), WDFC (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. USFD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is USFD or WDFC or KR or SYY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 64), 2. 0% yield, +108. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KR: +108. 7%, USFD: +248. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between USFD and WDFC and KR and SYY?
These companies operate in different sectors (USFD (Consumer Defensive) and WDFC (Basic Materials) and KR (Consumer Defensive) and SYY (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
WDFC, KR, SYY pay a dividend while USFD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.