UTZ vs WMT vs KR vs SYY

For growth investors, Walmart Inc.

(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 4% for The Kroger Co. (KR). Sysco Corporation (SYY) offers the better valuation at 19. 5x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Utz Brands, Inc. (UTZ) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the cheapest at 19.

5x versus Utz Brands, Inc. at 848. 4x. On forward P/E, Utz Brands, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sysco Corporation wins at 0. 29x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.

(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to -69. 3% for Utz Brands, Inc. (UTZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus UTZ's -5. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Kroger Co.

(KR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 64β versus Utz Brands, Inc. 's 0. 52β — meaning UTZ is approximately -181% more volatile than KR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.

(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus 0. 4% for The Kroger Co. (KR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Walmart Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to -95. 2% for Utz Brands, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SYY leads at 5. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Walmart Inc.

(WMT) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 1% net margin versus 0. 1% for Utz Brands, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UTZ leads at 6. 8% versus 1. 3% for KR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WMT leads at 24. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 29x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Utz Brands, Inc. (UTZ) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 34. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UTZ: 61. 0% to $12. 43.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Utz Brands, Inc. (UTZ) offers the highest yield at 3. 3%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Kroger Co.

(KR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 64), 2. 0% yield, +108. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KR: +108. 7%, UTZ: -5. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: UTZ is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; KR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SYY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.