Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
UZE vs CSCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
UZE vs CSCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $1.58B | $362.87B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.91B | $59.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $290M | $11.08B |
| Gross Margin | 57.5% | 64.4% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 23.0% |
| Forward P/E | 20.5x | 22.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.71B | $29.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $113M | $9.47B |
UZE vs CSCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Array Digital Infra… (UZE) | 100 | 72.3 | -27.7% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) | 100 | 204.8 | +104.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UZE vs CSCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UZE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 66.4%, current ratio 0.72x
- Beta 0.65, yield 100.0%, current ratio 0.72x
CSCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.3%, EPS growth 0.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.2%
- 299.4% 10Y total return vs UZE's 1.0%
- 5.3% revenue growth vs UZE's -95.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.3% revenue growth vs UZE's -95.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.5x vs 22.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.8% margin vs UZE's 15.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs CSCO's 0.92 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs CSCO's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.5% vs UZE's -11.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs UZE's 3.8%, ROIC 13.0% vs -0.6% |
UZE vs CSCO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UZE vs CSCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSCO is the larger business by revenue, generating $59.1B annually — 30.8x UZE's $1.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 18.8% (CSCO) to 15.2% (UZE). On growth, CSCO holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $59.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $430M | $16.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $290M | $11.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.6B | $12.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.5% | +64.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +23.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +18.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +137.8% | +21.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -93.8% | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | +29.5% |
Valuation Metrics
UZE leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.5x trailing earnings, UZE trades at a 85% valuation discount to CSCO's 35.9x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $362.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $383.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.47x | 35.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.52x | 22.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.11x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 26.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.68x | 6.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.62x | 7.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.60x | 27.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CSCO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CSCO delivers a 23.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $8 for UZE. CSCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.63x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UZE's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CSCO scores 8/9 vs UZE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.1% | +23.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.6% | +13.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.7% | +13.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.66x | 0.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $20.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $113M | $9.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $29.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.74x | 9.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CSCO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CSCO five years ago would be worth $18,971 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,703 for UZE. Over the past 12 months, CSCO leads with a +57.5% total return vs UZE's -11.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CSCO at 27.7% vs UZE's 18.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.7% | +21.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.1% | +57.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.1% | +108.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.0% | +89.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.0% | +299.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.4% | +27.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — UZE and CSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UZE is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CSCO's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSCO currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs UZE's 81.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.35 | $94.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.29 | $58.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.6% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.2 | 74.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5K | 19.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — UZE and CSCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, UZE offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs CSCO's 1.76%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $96.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 73 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $22.76 | $1.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | +2.0% |
CSCO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UZE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
UZE vs CSCO: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UZE or CSCO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) is the stronger pick with 5. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -95. 7% for Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZE). Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZE) offers the better valuation at 5. 5x trailing P/E (20. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) a "Buy" — based on 73 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UZE or CSCO?
On trailing P/E, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc.
5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZE) is the cheapest at 5. 5x versus Cisco Systems, Inc. at 35. 9x. On forward P/E, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 is actually cheaper at 20. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UZE or CSCO?
Over the past 5 years, Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) delivered a total return of +89. 7%, compared to -3. 0% for Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSCO returned +299. 4% versus UZE's +1. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UZE or CSCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc.
5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Cisco Systems, Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning CSCO is approximately 42% more volatile than UZE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 63% versus 66% for Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UZE or CSCO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) is pulling ahead at 5. 3% versus -95. 7% for Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 grew EPS 823. 9% year-over-year, compared to 0. 4% for Cisco Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CSCO leads at 3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UZE or CSCO?
Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc.
5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZE) is the more profitable company, earning 178. 5% net margin versus 18. 0% for Cisco Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 178. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CSCO leads at 20. 8% versus -30. 2% for UZE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSCO leads at 64. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UZE or CSCO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc.
5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZE) trades at 20. 5x forward P/E versus 22. 1x for Cisco Systems, Inc. — 1. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — UZE or CSCO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZE) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 1. 8% for Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO).
09Is UZE or CSCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc.
5. 500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (UZE: +1. 0%, CSCO: +299. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UZE and CSCO?
These companies operate in different sectors (UZE (Communication Services) and CSCO (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UZE is a small-cap deep-value stock; CSCO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 9%
- Dividend Yield > 40.0%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.