Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VATE vs NX vs NUE vs CODI vs STLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction
Steel
Conglomerates
Steel
VATE vs NX vs NUE vs CODI vs STLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Construction | Steel | Conglomerates | Steel |
| Market Cap | $173M | $916M | $51.64B | $905M | $33.75B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.10B | $1.85B | $34.16B | $1.85B | $19.01B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-70M | $-240M | $2.33B | $-227M | $1.37B |
| Gross Margin | 17.0% | 26.1% | 14.0% | 38.7% | 14.0% |
| Operating Margin | 1.6% | -10.0% | 10.0% | 0.3% | 9.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.0x | 16.2x | 150.4x | 15.6x |
| Total Debt | $719M | $854M | $7.12B | $1.88B | $4.21B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $49M | $76M | $2.26B | $68M | $770M |
VATE vs NX vs NUE vs CODI vs STLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| INNOVATE Corp. (VATE) | 100 | 48.0 | -52.0% |
| Quanex Building Pro… (NX) | 100 | 161.8 | +61.8% |
| Nucor Corporation (NUE) | 100 | 536.4 | +436.4% |
| Compass Diversified (CODI) | 100 | 70.9 | -29.1% |
| Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) | 100 | 877.0 | +777.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VATE vs NX vs NUE vs CODI vs STLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VATE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in stability and momentum.
- Beta 0.94 vs NX's 1.89
- +118.9% vs CODI's -30.3%
NX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 43.8%, EPS growth -7.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.6%
- 43.8% revenue growth vs VATE's -22.2%
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 150.4x)
NUE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.03, yield 1.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 32.2%, current ratio 2.94x
- Beta 1.03, yield 1.0%, current ratio 2.94x
CODI is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.2% yield, vs NUE's 1.0%
STLD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 9.4% 10Y total return vs NUE's 426.7%
- PEG 0.62 vs NUE's 0.62
- 7.2% margin vs NX's -13.0%
- 8.5% ROA vs NX's -11.7%, ROIC 9.2% vs -8.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.8% revenue growth vs VATE's -22.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 150.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.2% margin vs NX's -13.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs NX's 1.89 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, vs NUE's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +118.9% vs CODI's -30.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.5% ROA vs NX's -11.7%, ROIC 9.2% vs -8.8% |
VATE vs NX vs NUE vs CODI vs STLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VATE vs NX vs NUE vs CODI vs STLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
STLD leads in 2 of 6 categories
VATE leads 0 • NX leads 0 • NUE leads 0 • CODI leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — VATE and NUE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NUE is the larger business by revenue, generating $34.2B annually — 31.1x VATE's $1.1B. STLD is the more profitable business, keeping 7.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NX's -13.0%. On growth, VATE holds the edge at +43.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $1.8B | $34.2B | $1.8B | $19.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $46M | -$81M | $4.9B | $109M | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$70M | -$240M | $2.3B | -$227M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $61M | $95M | $532M | $10M | $665M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.0% | +26.1% | +14.0% | +38.7% | +14.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | -10.0% | +10.0% | +0.3% | +9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.3% | -13.0% | +6.8% | -12.3% | +7.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +5.1% | +1.6% | +0.5% | +3.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.3% | +2.3% | +21.3% | -5.9% | +19.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.8% | +71.9% | +3.8% | -5.1% | +93.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VATE and NX each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.2x trailing earnings, STLD trades at a 3% valuation discount to NUE's 30.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), STLD offers better value at 1.15x vs NUE's 1.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $173M | $916M | $51.6B | $905M | $33.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $844M | $1.7B | $56.5B | $2.7B | $37.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.64x | -3.70x | 30.15x | -3.94x | 29.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.99x | 16.15x | 150.38x | 15.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.16x | — | 1.15x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.57x | — | 13.65x | 14.99x | 18.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.16x | 0.50x | 1.59x | 0.48x | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.28x | 2.37x | 1.58x | 3.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.96x | — | — | 67.29x |
Profitability & Efficiency
STLD leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STLD delivers a 15.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-50 for CODI. NUE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CODI's 3.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NUE scores 7/9 vs VATE's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -30.2% | +10.6% | -49.6% | +15.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.8% | -11.7% | +6.7% | -7.3% | +8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | -8.8% | +7.7% | +1.0% | +9.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | -10.4% | +8.9% | +2.4% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.18x | 0.32x | 3.27x | 0.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $670M | $778M | $4.9B | $1.8B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $49M | $76M | $2.3B | $68M | $770M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $719M | $854M | $7.1B | $1.9B | $4.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.21x | -3.30x | 29.72x | -0.97x | 20.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STLD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STLD five years ago would be worth $38,057 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,609 for VATE. Over the past 12 months, VATE leads with a +118.9% total return vs CODI's -30.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STLD at 34.6% vs VATE's -20.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +158.8% | +31.1% | +34.2% | +158.7% | +32.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +118.9% | +23.2% | +98.8% | -30.3% | +79.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.5% | +6.0% | +64.7% | -25.6% | +143.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.9% | -22.0% | +140.0% | -35.5% | +280.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.8% | +23.7% | +426.7% | +53.7% | +940.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.9% | +2.0% | +18.1% | -9.4% | +34.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VATE and NUE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VATE is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NX's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NUE currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs CODI's 68.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 1.89x | 1.03x | 1.09x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.46 | $22.98 | $235.44 | $17.46 | $243.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.75 | $11.04 | $106.21 | $4.58 | $119.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.2% | +87.3% | +96.3% | +68.9% | +95.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.3 | 54.6 | 85.9 | 70.0 | 81.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 42K | 458K | 1.4M | 1.2M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NUE and CODI and STLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NX as "Hold", NUE as "Buy", CODI as "Hold", STLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.7% upside for CODI (target: $15) vs -19.1% for STLD (target: $188). For income investors, CODI offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs VATE's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $222.83 | $15.00 | $188.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 32 | 14 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +1.6% | +1.0% | +4.2% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | $0.32 | $2.22 | $0.50 | $1.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.5% | +1.4% | +0.0% | +2.7% |
STLD leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 4 categories are tied.
VATE vs NX vs NUE vs CODI vs STLD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VATE or NX or NUE or CODI or STLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) is the stronger pick with 43.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 2% for INNOVATE Corp. (VATE). Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) offers the better valuation at 29. 2x trailing P/E (15. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nucor Corporation (NUE) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VATE or NX or NUE or CODI or STLD?
On trailing P/E, Steel Dynamics, Inc.
(STLD) is the cheapest at 29. 2x versus Nucor Corporation at 30. 1x. On forward P/E, Quanex Building Products Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Steel Dynamics, Inc. wins at 0. 62x versus Nucor Corporation's 0. 62x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VATE or NX or NUE or CODI or STLD?
Over the past 5 years, Steel Dynamics, Inc.
(STLD) delivered a total return of +280. 6%, compared to -63. 9% for INNOVATE Corp. (VATE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STLD returned +940. 9% versus NX's +23. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VATE or NX or NUE or CODI or STLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), INNOVATE Corp.
(VATE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Quanex Building Products Corporation's 1. 89β — meaning NX is approximately 102% more volatile than VATE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nucor Corporation (NUE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 3% for Compass Diversified — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VATE or NX or NUE or CODI or STLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) is pulling ahead at 43.
8% versus -22. 2% for INNOVATE Corp. (VATE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: INNOVATE Corp. grew EPS 42. 9% year-over-year, compared to -1426. 1% for Compass Diversified. Over a 3-year CAGR, NX leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VATE or NX or NUE or CODI or STLD?
Steel Dynamics, Inc.
(STLD) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 5% net margin versus -13. 6% for Quanex Building Products Corporation — meaning it keeps 6. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NUE leads at 8. 2% versus -10. 6% for NX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODI leads at 38. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VATE or NX or NUE or CODI or STLD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus Nucor Corporation's 0. 62x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 150. 4x for Compass Diversified — 140. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CODI: 24. 7% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — VATE or NX or NUE or CODI or STLD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Compass Diversified (CODI) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 0. 7% for INNOVATE Corp. (VATE).
09Is VATE or NX or NUE or CODI or STLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Steel Dynamics, Inc.
(STLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 8% yield, +940. 9% 10Y return). Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (STLD: +940. 9%, NX: +23. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VATE and NX and NUE and CODI and STLD?
These companies operate in different sectors (VATE (Industrials) and NX (Industrials) and NUE (Basic Materials) and CODI (Industrials) and STLD (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VATE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NX is a small-cap high-growth stock; NUE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CODI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; STLD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.