Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VATE vs SPIR vs ASTS vs CODI vs GSAT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Communication Equipment
Conglomerates
Telecommunications Services
VATE vs SPIR vs ASTS vs CODI vs GSAT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Specialty Business Services | Communication Equipment | Conglomerates | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $173M | $529.86B | $19.12B | $905M | $10.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.10B | $72M | $71M | $1.85B | $262M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-70M | $-25.02B | $-342M | $-227M | $-50M |
| Gross Margin | 17.0% | 40.8% | 53.4% | 38.7% | 57.2% |
| Operating Margin | 1.6% | -121.4% | -405.7% | 0.3% | 1.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.0x | — | 150.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $719M | $8.76B | $32M | $1.88B | $542M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $49M | $24.81B | $2.34B | $68M | $391M |
VATE vs SPIR vs ASTS vs CODI vs GSAT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| INNOVATE Corp. (VATE) | 100 | 37.9 | -62.1% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 20.5 | -79.5% |
| AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS) | 100 | 645.4 | +545.4% |
| Compass Diversified (CODI) | 100 | 61.5 | -38.5% |
| Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) | 100 | 1687.0 | +1587.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VATE vs SPIR vs ASTS vs CODI vs GSAT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VATE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 0.7%
- -6.3% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
- Beta 0.94 vs SPIR's 2.93
SPIR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Better valuation composite
ASTS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs GSAT's 201.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.82, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 16.35x
- 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
CODI is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.09, yield 4.2%, current ratio 2.42x
- 4.2% yield, vs GSAT's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
GSAT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum and efficiency is your priority.
- +305.2% vs CODI's -30.3%
- -2.3% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC -0.1% vs -0.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -6.3% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs SPIR's 2.93 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, vs GSAT's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +305.2% vs CODI's -30.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -2.3% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC -0.1% vs -0.1% |
VATE vs SPIR vs ASTS vs CODI vs GSAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VATE vs SPIR vs ASTS vs CODI vs GSAT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VATE leads in 1 of 6 categories
ASTS leads 1 • SPIR leads 0 • CODI leads 0 • GSAT leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — VATE and GSAT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CODI is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 26.0x ASTS's $71M. VATE is the more profitable business, keeping -6.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $72M | $71M | $1.8B | $262M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $46M | -$74M | -$237M | $109M | $93M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$70M | -$25.0B | -$342M | -$227M | -$50M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $61M | -$16.2B | -$1.1B | $10M | $151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.0% | +40.8% | +53.4% | +38.7% | +57.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | -121.4% | -4.1% | +0.3% | +1.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.3% | -349.6% | -4.8% | -12.3% | -19.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | -227.0% | -16.0% | +0.5% | +57.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.3% | -26.9% | +27.3% | -5.9% | +2.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.8% | +59.5% | -55.6% | -5.1% | -121.9% |
Valuation Metrics
VATE leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, VATE's 11.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GSAT's 119.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $173M | $529.9B | $19.1B | $905M | $10.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $844M | $513.8B | $16.8B | $2.7B | $10.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.64x | 10.01x | -48.76x | -3.94x | -138.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 150.38x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.57x | — | — | 14.99x | 119.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.16x | 7405.21x | 269.64x | 0.48x | 41.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.56x | 5.68x | 1.58x | 28.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 57.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SPIR and ASTS and GSAT each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GSAT delivers a -13.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-14 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CODI's 3.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPIR scores 5/9 vs VATE's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -88.4% | -21.1% | -49.6% | -13.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.8% | -47.3% | -12.6% | -7.3% | -2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | -0.1% | -47.1% | +1.0% | -0.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | -0.1% | -10.0% | +2.4% | -0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.08x | 0.01x | 3.27x | 1.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $670M | -$16.1B | -$2.3B | $1.8B | $151M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $49M | $24.8B | $2.3B | $68M | $391M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $719M | $8.8B | $32M | $1.9B | $542M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.21x | 9.20x | -21.20x | -0.97x | -0.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASTS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $78,824 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,035 for SPIR. Over the past 12 months, GSAT leads with a +305.2% total return vs CODI's -30.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 134.8% vs VATE's -20.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +158.8% | +106.4% | -21.7% | +158.7% | +27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +118.9% | +73.1% | +158.1% | -30.3% | +305.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.5% | +198.1% | +1194.0% | -25.6% | +484.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.9% | -79.6% | +688.2% | -35.5% | +393.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.8% | -78.8% | +568.8% | +53.7% | +201.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.9% | +43.9% | +134.8% | -9.4% | +80.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VATE and GSAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VATE is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GSAT currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs ASTS's 50.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 2.93x | 2.82x | 1.09x | 2.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.46 | $23.59 | $129.89 | $17.46 | $82.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.75 | $6.60 | $22.47 | $4.58 | $17.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.2% | +68.3% | +50.3% | +68.9% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.3 | 55.5 | 41.8 | 70.0 | 66.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 42K | 1.6M | 14.9M | 1.2M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CODI and GSAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPIR as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy", CODI as "Hold", GSAT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 58.6% upside for ASTS (target: $104) vs -19.0% for GSAT (target: $66). For income investors, CODI offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs GSAT's 0.10%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.25 | $103.65 | $15.00 | $66.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 7 | 14 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | — | — | +4.2% | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | — | — | $0.50 | $0.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
VATE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). ASTS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
VATE vs SPIR vs ASTS vs CODI vs GSAT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VATE or SPIR or ASTS or CODI or GSAT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — VATE or SPIR or ASTS or CODI or GSAT?
Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) delivered a total return of +688. 2%, compared to -79. 6% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +568. 8% versus SPIR's -78. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — VATE or SPIR or ASTS or CODI or GSAT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), INNOVATE Corp.
(VATE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 213% more volatile than VATE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for Compass Diversified — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — VATE or SPIR or ASTS or CODI or GSAT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to -1426. 1% for Compass Diversified. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTS leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — VATE or SPIR or ASTS or CODI or GSAT?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -482. 2% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VATE leads at 3. 6% versus -405. 7% for ASTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GSAT leads at 66. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is VATE or SPIR or ASTS or CODI or GSAT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASTS: 58.
6% to $103. 65.
07Which pays a better dividend — VATE or SPIR or ASTS or CODI or GSAT?
In this comparison, CODI (4.
2% yield), VATE (0. 7% yield), GSAT (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. SPIR, ASTS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is VATE or SPIR or ASTS or CODI or GSAT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, INNOVATE Corp.
(VATE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 0. 7% yield). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VATE: +23. 8%, SPIR: -78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between VATE and SPIR and ASTS and CODI and GSAT?
These companies operate in different sectors (VATE (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and CODI (Industrials) and GSAT (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VATE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CODI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GSAT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. VATE, CODI pay a dividend while SPIR, ASTS, GSAT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.