Financial - Mortgages
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VEL vs FBRT vs RC vs ACRE vs TRTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
VEL vs FBRT vs RC vs ACRE vs TRTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Mortgages | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $718M | $696M | $357M | $280M | $656M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $714M | $401M | $499M | $55M | $264M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $108M | $72M | $-229M | $-20M | $61M |
| Gross Margin | 95.3% | 59.9% | -0.0% | 46.3% | 78.5% |
| Operating Margin | 71.6% | 36.9% | -50.5% | 44.6% | 51.0% |
| Forward P/E | 6.6x | 8.9x | — | 16.3x | 8.1x |
| Total Debt | $6.54B | $4.25B | $5.86B | $1.05B | $3.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $92M | $167M | $248M | $29M | $88M |
VEL vs FBRT vs RC vs ACRE vs TRTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Velocity Financial,… (VEL) | 100 | 142.3 | +42.3% |
| Franklin BSP Realty… (FBRT) | 100 | 55.1 | -44.9% |
| Ready Capital Corpo… (RC) | 100 | 12.2 | -87.8% |
| Ares Commercial Rea… (ACRE) | 100 | 32.3 | -67.7% |
| TPG RE Finance Trus… (TRTX) | 100 | 64.7 | -35.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VEL vs FBRT vs RC vs ACRE vs TRTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VEL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 35.4% 10Y total return vs ACRE's 43.3%
- Lower P/E (6.6x vs 8.1x)
- Beta 0.42 vs RC's 1.17
- 1.5% ROA vs RC's -2.6%, ROIC 6.1% vs 1.2%
FBRT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 18.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, current ratio 18.43x
- Beta 0.74, yield 18.7%, current ratio 18.43x
RC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 45.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.2%
- 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs FBRT's -100.0%
- 31.4% yield, vs TRTX's 13.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, ACRE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TRTX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and momentum.
- 23.2% margin vs RC's -45.8%
- +25.7% vs RC's -44.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs FBRT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 8.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.2% margin vs RC's -45.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs RC's 1.17 | |
| Dividends | 31.4% yield, vs TRTX's 13.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.7% vs RC's -44.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.5% ROA vs RC's -2.6%, ROIC 6.1% vs 1.2% |
VEL vs FBRT vs RC vs ACRE vs TRTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
VEL vs FBRT vs RC vs ACRE vs TRTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VEL leads in 2 of 6 categories
FBRT leads 0 • RC leads 0 • ACRE leads 0 • TRTX leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — VEL and RC and TRTX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VEL is the larger business by revenue, generating $714M annually — 13.1x ACRE's $55M. TRTX is the more profitable business, keeping 23.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RC's -45.8%. On growth, RC holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $714M | $401M | $499M | $55M | $264M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $273M | $159M | -$249M | $31M | $144M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $108M | $72M | -$229M | -$20M | $61M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $26M | $121M | $303M | -$44M | $96M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +95.3% | +59.9% | -0.0% | +46.3% | +78.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +71.6% | +36.9% | -50.5% | +44.6% | +51.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +17.9% | -45.8% | -36.3% | +23.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +30.3% | +60.6% | -80.3% | +36.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +8.7% | -10.0% | -4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | -65.0% | +24.9% | -2.0% | +58.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VEL and RC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.7x trailing earnings, VEL trades at a 55% valuation discount to TRTX's 14.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VEL's 14.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FBRT's 49.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $718M | $696M | $357M | $280M | $656M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.2B | $4.8B | $6.0B | $1.3B | $3.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.65x | 14.13x | -1.50x | -307.93x | 14.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.60x | 8.93x | — | 16.34x | 8.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.95x | 48.98x | 48.25x | 18.49x | 15.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.00x | — | 0.71x | 3.28x | 1.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 0.51x | 0.22x | 0.54x | 0.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 40.13x | 2.38x | — | 14.18x | 7.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VEL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VEL delivers a 16.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-12 for RC. ACRE carries lower financial leverage with a 2.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VEL's 9.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VEL scores 6/9 vs ACRE's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.6% | +4.7% | -12.2% | -3.9% | +5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +1.2% | -2.6% | -1.3% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +1.2% | +1.2% | +2.9% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.6% | +1.5% | +1.4% | +5.8% | +7.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 9.68x | 2.78x | 3.55x | 2.06x | 3.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.4B | $4.1B | $5.6B | $1.0B | $3.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $92M | $167M | $248M | $29M | $88M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.5B | $4.3B | $5.9B | $1.0B | $3.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.07x | — | 0.41x | 0.95x | 1.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VEL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VEL five years ago would be worth $14,632 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,564 for RC. Over the past 12 months, TRTX leads with a +25.7% total return vs RC's -44.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VEL at 27.2% vs RC's -23.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.4% | -8.6% | +1.4% | +9.9% | -1.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.4% | -7.0% | -44.9% | +20.7% | +25.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.7% | +2.3% | -54.4% | -4.4% | +103.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.3% | -11.1% | -44.4% | -29.5% | +1.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.4% | -11.1% | +6.1% | +43.3% | -1.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.2% | +0.8% | -23.1% | -1.5% | +26.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VEL and TRTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VEL is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RC's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRTX currently trades 86.2% from its 52-week high vs RC's 45.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.42x | 0.74x | 1.15x | 0.96x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.39 | $11.84 | $4.75 | $5.89 | $9.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.18 | $8.24 | $1.51 | $4.05 | $7.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.5% | +76.4% | +45.5% | +85.7% | +86.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.1 | 55.3 | 64.1 | 53.4 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 99K | 918K | 2.1M | 396K | 655K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RC and TRTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VEL as "Buy", FBRT as "Buy", RC as "Buy", ACRE as "Buy", TRTX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 69.6% upside for FBRT (target: $15) vs -1.0% for ACRE (target: $5). For income investors, RC offers the higher dividend yield at 31.37% vs TRTX's 13.50%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.00 | $15.33 | $2.50 | $5.00 | $10.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 4 | 16 | 13 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +18.7% | +31.4% | +14.1% | +13.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.69 | $0.68 | $0.71 | $1.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +2.1% | +18.9% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
VEL leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 4 categories are tied.
VEL vs FBRT vs RC vs ACRE vs TRTX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VEL or FBRT or RC or ACRE or TRTX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is the stronger pick with 1726% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100.
0% for Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT). Velocity Financial, Inc. (VEL) offers the better valuation at 6. 7x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Velocity Financial, Inc. (VEL) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VEL or FBRT or RC or ACRE or TRTX?
On trailing P/E, Velocity Financial, Inc.
(VEL) is the cheapest at 6. 7x versus TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc. at 14. 9x. On forward P/E, Velocity Financial, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VEL or FBRT or RC or ACRE or TRTX?
Over the past 5 years, Velocity Financial, Inc.
(VEL) delivered a total return of +46. 3%, compared to -44. 4% for Ready Capital Corporation (RC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACRE returned +44. 1% versus FBRT's -11. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VEL or FBRT or RC or ACRE or TRTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Velocity Financial, Inc.
(VEL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 42β versus Ready Capital Corporation's 1. 15β — meaning RC is approximately 174% more volatile than VEL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 10% for Velocity Financial, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VEL or FBRT or RC or ACRE or TRTX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is pulling ahead at 1726% versus -100.
0% for Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation grew EPS 97. 4% year-over-year, compared to -26. 0% for TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RC leads at 9. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VEL or FBRT or RC or ACRE or TRTX?
TPG RE Finance Trust, Inc.
(TRTX) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 1% net margin versus -45. 8% for Ready Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps 18. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRTX leads at 73. 0% versus 24. 2% for RC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VEL leads at 95. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VEL or FBRT or RC or ACRE or TRTX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Velocity Financial, Inc.
(VEL) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 16. 3x for Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation — 9. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FBRT: 69. 6% to $15. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — VEL or FBRT or RC or ACRE or TRTX?
In this comparison, RC (31.
4% yield), FBRT (18. 7% yield), ACRE (14. 1% yield), TRTX (13. 5% yield) pay a dividend. VEL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VEL or FBRT or RC or ACRE or TRTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.
(FBRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 18. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FBRT: -11. 1%, RC: +4. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VEL and FBRT and RC and ACRE and TRTX?
These companies operate in different sectors (VEL (Financial Services) and FBRT (Real Estate) and RC (Real Estate) and ACRE (Real Estate) and TRTX (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VEL is a small-cap high-growth stock; FBRT is a small-cap deep-value stock; RC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACRE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TRTX is a small-cap high-growth stock. FBRT, RC, ACRE, TRTX pay a dividend while VEL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.