Financial - Mortgages
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VEL vs RC vs ACRE vs GPMT vs TPVG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
Asset Management
VEL vs RC vs ACRE vs GPMT vs TPVG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Mortgages | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $718M | $357M | $280M | $74M | $243M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $714M | $499M | $55M | $132M | $97M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $108M | $-229M | $-20M | $-40M | $-12M |
| Gross Margin | 95.3% | -0.0% | 46.3% | 47.3% | 83.5% |
| Operating Margin | 71.6% | -50.5% | 44.6% | -4.3% | 77.9% |
| Forward P/E | 6.6x | — | 16.3x | — | 6.5x |
| Total Debt | $6.54B | $5.86B | $1.05B | $1.17B | $469M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $92M | $248M | $29M | $66M | $20M |
VEL vs RC vs ACRE vs GPMT vs TPVG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Velocity Financial,… (VEL) | 100 | 470.2 | +370.2% |
| Ready Capital Corpo… (RC) | 100 | 36.8 | -63.2% |
| Ares Commercial Rea… (ACRE) | 100 | 67.8 | -32.2% |
| Granite Point Mortg… (GPMT) | 100 | 31.5 | -68.5% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 59.8 | -40.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VEL vs RC vs ACRE vs GPMT vs TPVG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VEL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, current ratio 0.63x
- Beta 0.42 vs GPMT's 1.44
- 1.5% ROA vs RC's -2.6%, ROIC 6.1% vs 1.2%
RC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.17, yield 31.4%
- Beta 1.17, yield 31.4%, current ratio 1.04x
- 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs ACRE's -2.8%
- 31.4% yield, vs TPVG's 17.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
ACRE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +20.7% vs RC's -44.9%
GPMT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 187.8%, EPS growth 73.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.9%
TPVG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 93.3% 10Y total return vs VEL's 35.4%
- NIM 7.4% vs VEL's 2.5%
- Better valuation composite
- 50.6% margin vs RC's -45.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs ACRE's -2.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.6% margin vs RC's -45.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs GPMT's 1.44 | |
| Dividends | 31.4% yield, vs TPVG's 17.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.7% vs RC's -44.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.5% ROA vs RC's -2.6%, ROIC 6.1% vs 1.2% |
VEL vs RC vs ACRE vs GPMT vs TPVG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
VEL vs RC vs ACRE vs GPMT vs TPVG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TPVG leads in 1 of 6 categories
VEL leads 1 • RC leads 1 • ACRE leads 0 • GPMT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — RC and TPVG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VEL is the larger business by revenue, generating $714M annually — 13.1x ACRE's $55M. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RC's -45.8%. On growth, RC holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $714M | $499M | $55M | $132M | $97M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $273M | -$249M | $31M | -$8M | -$22M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $108M | -$229M | -$20M | -$40M | -$12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $26M | $303M | -$44M | $463,000 | $35M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +95.3% | -0.0% | +46.3% | +47.3% | +83.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +71.6% | -50.5% | +44.6% | -4.3% | +77.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | -45.8% | -36.3% | -30.5% | +50.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +60.6% | -80.3% | +0.4% | -58.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +8.7% | -10.0% | +157.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | +24.9% | -2.0% | +40.9% | -2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ACRE and GPMT and TPVG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 26% valuation discount to VEL's 6.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TPVG's 9.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RC's 48.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $718M | $357M | $280M | $74M | $243M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.2B | $6.0B | $1.3B | $1.2B | $691M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.65x | -1.50x | -307.93x | -1.34x | 4.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.60x | — | 16.34x | — | 6.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 4.84x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.95x | 48.25x | 18.49x | 20.75x | 9.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.00x | 0.71x | 3.28x | 0.51x | 2.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 0.22x | 0.54x | 0.13x | 0.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 40.13x | — | 14.18x | 27.85x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TPVG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VEL delivers a 16.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-12 for RC. TPVG carries lower financial leverage with a 1.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VEL's 9.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VEL scores 6/9 vs TPVG's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.6% | -12.2% | -3.9% | -7.1% | -3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | -2.6% | -1.3% | -2.3% | -1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +1.2% | +2.9% | +2.6% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.6% | +1.4% | +5.8% | +4.6% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 9.68x | 3.55x | 2.06x | 2.12x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.4B | $5.6B | $1.0B | $1.1B | $449M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $92M | $248M | $29M | $66M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.5B | $5.9B | $1.0B | $1.2B | $469M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.07x | 0.41x | 0.95x | 0.58x | -1.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VEL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VEL five years ago would be worth $14,632 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,472 for GPMT. Over the past 12 months, ACRE leads with a +20.7% total return vs RC's -44.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VEL at 27.2% vs RC's -23.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.4% | +1.4% | +9.9% | -32.5% | -6.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.4% | -44.9% | +20.7% | -19.7% | +19.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.7% | -54.4% | -4.4% | -34.3% | -3.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.3% | -44.4% | -29.5% | -65.3% | -13.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.4% | +6.1% | +43.3% | -50.0% | +93.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.2% | -23.1% | -1.5% | -13.1% | -1.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VEL and ACRE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VEL is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPMT's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACRE currently trades 85.7% from its 52-week high vs RC's 45.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.42x | 1.17x | 0.99x | 1.44x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.39 | $4.75 | $5.89 | $3.12 | $7.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.18 | $1.51 | $4.05 | $1.24 | $4.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.5% | +45.5% | +85.7% | +49.7% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.1 | 64.1 | 53.4 | 49.4 | 58.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 99K | 2.1M | 396K | 154K | 504K |
Analyst Outlook
RC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VEL as "Buy", RC as "Buy", ACRE as "Buy", GPMT as "Hold", TPVG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 61.3% upside for GPMT (target: $3) vs -1.0% for ACRE (target: $5). For income investors, RC offers the higher dividend yield at 31.37% vs GPMT's 13.98%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.00 | $2.50 | $5.00 | $2.50 | $8.95 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 16 | 13 | 12 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +31.4% | +14.1% | +14.0% | +17.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.68 | $0.71 | $0.22 | $1.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +18.9% | 0.0% | +7.6% | 0.0% |
TPVG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). VEL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
VEL vs RC vs ACRE vs GPMT vs TPVG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VEL or RC or ACRE or GPMT or TPVG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is the stronger pick with 1726% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2.
8% for Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Velocity Financial, Inc. (VEL) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VEL or RC or ACRE or GPMT or TPVG?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 9x versus Velocity Financial, Inc. at 6. 7x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VEL or RC or ACRE or GPMT or TPVG?
Over the past 5 years, Velocity Financial, Inc.
(VEL) delivered a total return of +46. 3%, compared to -65. 3% for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TPVG returned +93. 3% versus GPMT's -50. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VEL or RC or ACRE or GPMT or TPVG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Velocity Financial, Inc.
(VEL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 42β versus Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning GPMT is approximately 242% more volatile than VEL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 133% versus 10% for Velocity Financial, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VEL or RC or ACRE or GPMT or TPVG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is pulling ahead at 1726% versus -2.
8% for Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation grew EPS 97. 4% year-over-year, compared to 44. 0% for Velocity Financial, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GPMT leads at 22. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VEL or RC or ACRE or GPMT or TPVG?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus -45. 8% for Ready Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus 24. 2% for RC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VEL leads at 95. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VEL or RC or ACRE or GPMT or TPVG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) trades at 6. 5x forward P/E versus 16. 3x for Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation — 9. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GPMT: 61. 3% to $2. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — VEL or RC or ACRE or GPMT or TPVG?
In this comparison, RC (31.
4% yield), TPVG (17. 1% yield), ACRE (14. 1% yield), GPMT (14. 0% yield) pay a dividend. VEL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VEL or RC or ACRE or GPMT or TPVG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 17. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TPVG: +93. 3%, GPMT: -50. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VEL and RC and ACRE and GPMT and TPVG?
These companies operate in different sectors (VEL (Financial Services) and RC (Real Estate) and ACRE (Real Estate) and GPMT (Real Estate) and TPVG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VEL is a small-cap high-growth stock; RC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACRE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GPMT is a small-cap high-growth stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock. RC, ACRE, GPMT, TPVG pay a dividend while VEL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.