Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VERX vs HYFM vs GRWG vs RYAN vs IIPR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Specialty Retail
Insurance - Specialty
REIT - Industrial
VERX vs HYFM vs GRWG vs RYAN vs IIPR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Agricultural - Machinery | Specialty Retail | Insurance - Specialty | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $2.34B | $5M | $85M | $4.11B | $1.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $768M | $146M | $162M | $3.16B | $263M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $-65M | $-24M | $132M | $120M |
| Gross Margin | 63.3% | 10.2% | 26.8% | 69.4% | 60.3% |
| Operating Margin | -1.1% | -35.8% | -15.7% | 16.6% | 46.7% |
| Forward P/E | 19.9x | — | — | 14.9x | 13.5x |
| Total Debt | $360M | $170M | $29M | $3.53B | $394M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $314M | $26M | $30M | $158M | $48M |
VERX vs HYFM vs GRWG vs RYAN vs IIPR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vertex, Inc. (VERX) | 100 | 79.0 | -21.0% |
| Hydrofarm Holdings … (HYFM) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| GrowGeneration Corp. (GRWG) | 100 | 3.5 | -96.5% |
| Ryan Specialty Hold… (RYAN) | 100 | 106.1 | +6.1% |
| Innovative Industri… (IIPR) | 100 | 26.6 | -73.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VERX vs HYFM vs GRWG vs RYAN vs IIPR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VERX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.2%, EPS growth 111.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.0%
Among these 5 stocks, HYFM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GRWG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +25.7% vs HYFM's -75.4%
RYAN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 20.0% 10Y total return vs IIPR's 436.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.23, current ratio 7.51x
- Beta 0.23, yield 0.7%, current ratio 7.51x
- 21.3% revenue growth vs HYFM's -16.0%
IIPR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 13.5%
- Better valuation composite
- 45.6% margin vs HYFM's -44.5%
- 13.5% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs RYAN's 0.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.3% revenue growth vs HYFM's -16.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 45.6% margin vs HYFM's -44.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.23 vs GRWG's 1.27 | |
| Dividends | 13.5% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs RYAN's 0.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.7% vs HYFM's -75.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.1% ROA vs HYFM's -16.3%, ROIC 4.3% vs -9.6% |
VERX vs HYFM vs GRWG vs RYAN vs IIPR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VERX vs HYFM vs GRWG vs RYAN vs IIPR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IIPR leads in 2 of 6 categories
RYAN leads 1 • VERX leads 0 • HYFM leads 0 • GRWG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — RYAN and IIPR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RYAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 21.6x HYFM's $146M. IIPR is the more profitable business, keeping 45.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HYFM's -44.5%. On growth, RYAN holds the edge at +15.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $768M | $146M | $162M | $3.2B | $263M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $50M | -$23M | -$14M | $743M | $197M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | -$65M | -$24M | $132M | $120M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $99M | -$8M | -$10M | $555M | $144M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.3% | +10.2% | +26.8% | +69.4% | +60.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.1% | -35.8% | -15.7% | +16.6% | +46.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.8% | -44.5% | -14.9% | +4.2% | +45.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | -5.7% | -6.2% | +17.6% | +54.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.1% | -33.3% | +1.0% | +15.2% | -3.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -128.6% | -22.7% | +69.2% | +2.4% | -1.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HYFM and RYAN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, IIPR trades at a 96% valuation discount to VERX's 366.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RYAN's 8.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VERX's 26.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $5M | $85M | $4.1B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.4B | $148M | $84M | $7.5B | $2.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 366.75x | -0.07x | -3.55x | 67.49x | 14.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.90x | — | — | 14.90x | 13.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 3.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.77x | — | — | 8.20x | 9.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.13x | 0.03x | 0.53x | 1.35x | 6.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.21x | 0.02x | 0.87x | 7.04x | 0.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.76x | — | — | 7.14x | 9.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RYAN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RYAN delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-32 for HYFM. IIPR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RYAN's 2.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VERX scores 6/9 vs HYFM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.5% | -32.3% | -22.9% | +10.8% | +6.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.5% | -16.3% | -15.2% | +1.3% | +5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.2% | -9.6% | -16.9% | +10.8% | +4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.2% | -12.1% | -18.8% | +6.4% | +5.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.39x | 0.76x | 0.30x | 2.82x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $46M | $143M | -$929,000 | $3.4B | $346M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $314M | $26M | $30M | $158M | $48M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $360M | $170M | $29M | $3.5B | $394M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -3.77x | — | 2.29x | 6.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IIPR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RYAN five years ago would be worth $12,000 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16 for HYFM. Over the past 12 months, GRWG leads with a +25.7% total return vs HYFM's -75.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IIPR at 4.5% vs HYFM's -56.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.8% | -35.0% | -7.8% | -37.1% | +18.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -60.8% | -75.4% | +25.7% | -54.6% | +20.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.6% | -91.9% | -62.0% | -23.8% | +14.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.6% | -99.8% | -96.7% | +20.0% | -50.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.7% | -99.8% | -75.7% | +20.0% | +436.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.6% | -56.8% | -27.6% | -8.6% | +4.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RYAN and IIPR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RYAN is the less volatile stock with a 0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GRWG's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IIPR currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs HYFM's 21.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 0.73x | 1.15x | 0.19x | 0.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.44 | $4.78 | $2.40 | $72.50 | $61.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.59 | $0.81 | $0.87 | $29.28 | $44.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.6% | +21.8% | +59.2% | +43.8% | +92.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.3 | 54.8 | 63.2 | 28.8 | 59.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 41K | 476K | 2.1M | 303K |
Analyst Outlook
IIPR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VERX as "Buy", RYAN as "Buy", IIPR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 49.6% upside for IIPR (target: $85) vs 41.9% for VERX (target: $21). For income investors, IIPR offers the higher dividend yield at 13.46% vs RYAN's 0.71%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.82 | — | — | $45.60 | $84.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | — | — | 19 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.7% | +13.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | — | 0 | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.22 | $7.62 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +1.2% |
IIPR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). RYAN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
VERX vs HYFM vs GRWG vs RYAN vs IIPR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VERX or HYFM or GRWG or RYAN or IIPR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc.
(RYAN) is the stronger pick with 21. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 0% for Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (HYFM). Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vertex, Inc. (VERX) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VERX or HYFM or GRWG or RYAN or IIPR?
On trailing P/E, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
(IIPR) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus Vertex, Inc. at 366. 8x. On forward P/E, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VERX or HYFM or GRWG or RYAN or IIPR?
Over the past 5 years, Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc.
(RYAN) delivered a total return of +20. 0%, compared to -99. 8% for Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (HYFM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IIPR returned +439. 9% versus HYFM's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VERX or HYFM or GRWG or RYAN or IIPR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc.
(RYAN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 19β versus GrowGeneration Corp. 's 1. 15β — meaning GRWG is approximately 502% more volatile than RYAN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 3% for Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VERX or HYFM or GRWG or RYAN or IIPR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc.
(RYAN) is pulling ahead at 21. 3% versus -16. 0% for Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (HYFM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vertex, Inc. grew EPS 111. 8% year-over-year, compared to -33. 8% for Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RYAN leads at 20. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VERX or HYFM or GRWG or RYAN or IIPR?
Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
(IIPR) is the more profitable company, earning 43. 0% net margin versus -35. 1% for Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 43. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IIPR leads at 46. 7% versus -27. 4% for HYFM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RYAN leads at 90. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VERX or HYFM or GRWG or RYAN or IIPR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
(IIPR) trades at 13. 5x forward P/E versus 19. 9x for Vertex, Inc. — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IIPR: 49. 6% to $84. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — VERX or HYFM or GRWG or RYAN or IIPR?
In this comparison, IIPR (13.
5% yield), RYAN (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. VERX, HYFM, GRWG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VERX or HYFM or GRWG or RYAN or IIPR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc.
(RYAN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 19), 0. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RYAN: +18. 5%, GRWG: -75. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VERX and HYFM and GRWG and RYAN and IIPR?
These companies operate in different sectors (VERX (Technology) and HYFM (Industrials) and GRWG (Consumer Cyclical) and RYAN (Financial Services) and IIPR (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VERX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HYFM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GRWG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RYAN is a small-cap high-growth stock; IIPR is a small-cap deep-value stock. RYAN, IIPR pay a dividend while VERX, HYFM, GRWG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.